Folks, A question on the right to bear arms......

[Fitzwilk]

fitz you said it again,how come nobody gets it.

I reckon they don't want to get it....

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[Red James Cash]

I reckon they don't want to get it

I dont think they are capable of getting it.It all flies right over their heads.What it amounts to is they dont adapt and overcome,they surrender and conform.Pitiful,pitiful,pitiful.Its better to die on your feet than live on your knees.

 

[GrizLeeBear]

Griz interpretated the constitution. In my world, only the US Supreme Court has the right to do that. Anybody who interprets the US constitution for themselves; regardless of how they phrase or label it, borders on sedition and treason. You put 10 different doctors in a room and you end up getting 11 different opinions. The same can be said for patriots...let us not forget how many illegitmate children our founding fathers had with slaves. They recognized thier mortality and humanity. They desired to put the control of law beyond any one person's interpretation."

Crisp

The Constitution itself gives each of us the right to interpret and challenge it. More that the right, we have the responsibility to do so. The very basis of the Constitution is that we the people can change it through amendments. Smile when you you charge me with Treason. Please do not infringe on my right to free speech. I am by birth, upbringing and natural inclination a Southern Gentleman. However, there is a limit.

 

[Red James Cash]

You speak it as it is Grizz

 

[GrizLeeBear]

I always thought that our next war should be with Canada; not that they have anything I want, except maybe Calgary. But it would be nice to have a war with people that look like us and know the language. Not to mention that if we brought home a War Bride no one would know!

 

[Red James Cash]

Watch out Griz you might get a liberal for a wifeyou wont have to take her to far anyway.

 

[tlowery04]

if we take Canada, can we annex Mexico too? think of the law enforcement job opportunities as municipal governments are established moving southward. Canada, with its silly red coats and horses on the other hand could just lend us their parliamentary system in loo of our 2 party congress.

 

[bill from lachine]

Terry,

Thanks for the link.....it seems to cover the subject very well and appears the jury is still out to some extent as to what the proper definition is.

Regards + HH

Bill

Annotated Constitution Prototype

 

[Rebel - KGC]

if we take Canada, can we annex Mexico too? think of the law enforcement job opportunities as municipal governments are established moving southward. Canada, with its silly red coats and horses on the other hand could just lend us their parliamentary system in loo of our 2 party congress.

"Loo"... LOL! That's Brit for TOILET! LOL! Going to the Loo, now...

 

[tlowery04]

=.='

 

[bill from lachine]

Rebel,

Close enough the word lieu is probably what he meant.....since I speak both French and English.....I've been known to mess them both up at times....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

 

[gunsil]

I thought it was the right to keep and arm bears !!!

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Rebel,

Close enough the word lieu is probably what he meant.....since I speak both French and English.....I've been known to mess them both up at times....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

I thought it was LUE...

 

[Rebel - KGC]

I thought it was the right to keep and arm bears !!!

Now THAT... would be SOMETHING! WHOO!

 

[0121stockpicker]

Now THAT... would be SOMETHING! WHOO!

That's covered by life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

That's covered by life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

For BEARS...? Are deers covered...? YOU eat bear meat...? Deer meat...?

 

[Critical Recovery]

I think that people forget something. It's not about the object. It is about the fear of one person that that object makes another person able to object to their imposing their will.
Who is is easier to push around? A person with a gun, or an unarmed one?

 

[Rebel - KGC]

I think that people forget something. It's not about the object. It is about the fear of one person that that object makes another person able to object to their imposing their will.
Who is is easier to push around? A person with a gun, or an unarmed one?

Well... that COULD be a Zen question...

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Crime goes down in states that have license to carry and up in states that have gun control..

 

[packerbacker]

QUOTE "In my world, only the US Supreme Court has the right to do that. Anybody who interprets the US constitution for themselves; regardless of how they phrase or label it, borders on sedition and treason"
Are you saying that the Supreme Court is not capable of being "treasonous"? They too need watching, even closer wathching than the elected. They are "appointed" by the incumbent president and usually have the mindset of that incumbent. Should the people find the Supreme Court treasonous, then they shall be replaced, no matter the method used.