Crispin, if I had my way I would be in Florida like you and wondering why anyone would be in the frozen lands like I am. I think I will start calling Maine, "Desperation Flats" as I am desperate for summer!
Can I be an absent crazy Canuck? The cold is killing me! My fingers are still numb from helping to put away the snow balls!
Crispin, here we go! Lets first start with upper class. Most of them have their money through hard work (Bill Gates for example). They have a lot of money but this is a double edged sword. It allows those to pay and have security of which many choose to not do. In our current political situation, the politics of envy are running high. Those who are a have not want to punish those that have as a general rule (look at last presidential election for proof). This by it's very nature necessitates protection, the kind only a gun can provide.I'm changing sides again, I'm now anti-gun.
Stratification of wealth is an absolute for any functioning society. Socialism, is self-destructive, and will collapse upon itself. People who buy into socialism will be mowed down by the greedy and the selfish who seek to profit by the abuse of others. In stratifying wealth, classes are formed. For simplicity's sake, we can narrow our current capitalistic society down to lower, middle, and upper class. Upper class has no need to redistribute wealth and will lobby against it. They have no need to own guns because they will pay others to fight their wars, fill their coiffeurs, increase their stock dividends, and protect their loved ones. Why should they take a bullet when they can pay somebody else to do it for them?
Middle class has no need of guns. To survive in a capitalistic society as middle class necessitates hard work, ethics, and morality. All three of these things are hindrances to becoming upper class. Thus, hard working, honest people will have little need to defend themselves. They are held in check by the 1 percent who owns the government, they will not attack others due to their morality, and they have little that the lower class would want to take.
Lower class has no need of guns. Truly, the majority of murders and violence in guns occurs from this class doing crimes against each other. In the rare circumstances when it crosses over into middle and upper class the response and retaliation is swift. Guns serve nothing but to accelerate the deaths of other lower class compatriots. The very existence of the upper and middle class depend on a lower class. Deaths by murder work against that purpose.
In conclusion, elimination of guns in society will protect hard working people with ethics and morals. The lower class will find other ways to do destruction on each other and the upper class was never in danger.
The second amendment does little but to give a false sense of security. The constitution was drafted by upper class men in order to keep other races and women subservient to them. Joe Farmer and John Mason had no say in the ratification. This false sense of security is used to manipulate the honest and good people in this world. Guns kill people.
Prove me wrong Dieselram!
Crispin
dejapooh said:
dejapooh said:
dieselram94 said:
I'm changing sides again, I'm now anti-gun.
Stratification of wealth is an absolute for any functioning society. Socialism, is self-destructive, and will collapse upon itself. People who buy into socialism will be mowed down by the greedy and the selfish who seek to profit by the abuse of others. In stratifying wealth, classes are formed. For simplicity's sake, we can narrow our current capitalistic society down to lower, middle, and upper class. Upper class has no need to redistribute wealth and will lobby against it. They have no need to own guns because they will pay others to fight their wars, fill their coiffeurs, increase their stock dividends, and protect their loved ones. Why should they take a bullet when they can pay somebody else to do it for them?
Middle class has no need of guns. To survive in a capitalistic society as middle class necessitates hard work, ethics, and morality. All three of these things are hindrances to becoming upper class. Thus, hard working, honest people will have little need to defend themselves. They are held in check by the 1 percent who owns the government, they will not attack others due to their morality, and they have little that the lower class would want to take.
Lower class has no need of guns. Truly, the majority of murders and violence in guns occurs from this class doing crimes against each other. In the rare circumstances when it crosses over into middle and upper class the response and retaliation is swift. Guns serve nothing but to accelerate the deaths of other lower class compatriots. The very existence of the upper and middle class depend on a lower class. Deaths by murder work against that purpose.
In conclusion, elimination of guns in society will protect hard working people with ethics and morals. The lower class will find other ways to do destruction on each other and the upper class was never in danger.
The second amendment does little but to give a false sense of security. The constitution was drafted by upper class men in order to keep other races and women subservient to them. Joe Farmer and John Mason had no say in the ratification. This false sense of security is used to manipulate the honest and good people in this world. Guns kill people.
Prove me wrong Dieselram!
Crispin
Rebel - KGC said:
