Is this an error?

Old Dude

Gold Member
Feb 20, 2013
8,799
9,850
Luzerne County, Pa
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
2
Detector(s) used
Fisher F75, Garrett ATPro, Garrett GTAx 500
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Hi all. This was in circulation and it jumped out at me. Could someone please ID it for me? I don't know if it was an error or just something someone with a lot of time on their hands decided to do. As you can see in the second and third pictures, the obverse is slightly larger than the reverse. I assume the shiny portion is zinc? Thanks for replies from the knowledgeable members.
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1411847200.560889.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1411847230.349225.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1411847253.843054.jpg
 

BigWaveDave

Gold Member
Nov 22, 2013
9,323
16,998
Mountain Maryland
🥇 Banner finds
2
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
4
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro, AT Max, Minelab
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
NO..... more like a kid sat on a stoop, took a penny, rubbed it raw on cement on one side, then spent it. I did it myself as a kid, tails side is normal, heads worn down to nothing.
 

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,234
14,584
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Yup, that coin spent some time kissing the concrete.
 

enamel7

Gold Member
Apr 16, 2005
6,383
2,546
North Carolina
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Gold
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Looking at how the edge is reduced in the one photo still makes me believe dryer. It wouldn't be reduced like that by simply rubbing it on concrete.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top