Jury: Double-eagle coins belong to government

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Posted on Wed, Jul. 20, 2011
By Nathan Gorenstein
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

1933_double_eagle_obv.jpg
1933_double_eagle_rev.jpg


Ten famous $20 gold pieces that are worth millions to collectors were stolen from the Philadelphia Mint in the 1930s and are legally property of the U.S. Treasury, a federal court jury unanimously decided Wednesday.
After about five hours of deliberation after a seven day trial, the two men and eight women said the government proved that when the rare "Double-Eagle" coins ended up in the hands of the late Philadelphia jeweler Israel Switt, they did not get there legitimately.

Jurors accepted the government argument that there was no legal way any of the coins could have been removed from the Mint. All 445,500 coins minted by the government were supposed to have been destroyed by 1937.

"It sends a strong message" that the government will pursue thefts, "no matter how many years pass," Assistant U.S. Attorney Jacqueline Romero said after the verdict.

The coins are now in Fort Knox, Ky.

"Israel Switt and some of his friends stole 1933 double eagles from the Philadelphia Mint," Romero said during closing arguments Tuesday.

Barry Berke, the attorney for Switt's daughter, Joan Langboard and her two sons, Roy and David, declined to comment after the verdict. Appeals are expected. Roy Langbord shook a reporter's hand, but also declined comment. His mother was not in the courtroom.

Joan Langbord, 81, said on Tuesday that she had "no idea" how her father had obtained the 1933 double-eagle coins. A 1933 double eagle was sold in 2004 for $7.5 million, a record price for any coin.

The family contended they were legally entitled to the coins because there was no way to know exactly how the got out of the mint, and ended up in the Switt family's safety deposit box.

But Romero said the circumstantial evidence pointed to theft.

The Mint never legally issued the 1933 double eagles, and all 445,471 were accounted for in mint records, Romero said. In 1937, all the coins were supposed to have been melted down into bullion. But since then, at least 21 have surfaced, and all can be traced back to Switt, who Romero said had gotten them from a corrupt Mint official. Switt died in 1990.

Berke argued that the coins could have been legally obtained from the Mint during a "window of opportunity" in March and April 1933, and that government had not proved otherwise.

Langbord said she had discovered the coins in 2003 during one of her periodic visits to a safe-deposit box containing jewelry inherited from her mother.

"We did not think that was a credible story," Romero said after the verdict. Romero worked on the case for five yers, and prosecuted it in court with Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Rue.

U.S. District Court Judge Legrome D. Davis said it was one of the oldest cases before him, but there is at least one final hearing upcoming.

Along with seeking forfeiture, the government filed a motion for a declaratory judgement that the coins are American government property.

Because she inherited the box, Langbord said, she had not previously fully searched it, and only occasionally opened it to remove a piece of her mother's jewelry, uniquely styled and sought after by a customer, for sale at I. Switt, the Jeweler's Row store founded by her father.

"You never knew what was on the Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Rue asked on cross-examination.

"No, ma'am, I did not," Langbord said.

The coins were seized by the U.S. Treasury, but District Judge Legrome D. Davis ruled the government had to prove they had been stolen.

Langbord's appearance was a rare break after days of mind-numbing testimony about Mint records that government attorneys said accurately tracked every coin produced at the facility.

Berke contended otherwise, and in his closing said the complex records were incomplete and rife with errors, making it impossible for anyone to state with certainty that the coins were stolen.

In the 1940s, Switt was investigated by the Secret Service, which seized nine double eagles that he had sold to coin dealers after 1937. Switt said he had no recollection of how he had gotten those coins, and swore under oath that he had no others.

His daughter testified that while she had worked in her father's store from age 9, she had not been involved in purchasing goods and had never known he had the coins.
 

Sheldon J

Hero Member
Jul 18, 2009
897
599
Battle Creek, Mi
Detector(s) used
Mine lab, Garrett, Bounty Hunter,
It's called reasonable doubt, since there are obviously holes in the governments system, there is more than reasonable doubt, hence the coins should have been awarded back to the gal...
She was stupid to send them all in, and now any profit she may get in their retrieval pending an appeal may end up in lawyers pockets....
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Sheldon J said:
It's called reasonable doubt, since there are obviously holes in the governments system, there is more than reasonable doubt, hence the coins should have been awarded back to the gal...
She was stupid to send them all in, and now any profit she may get in their retrieval pending an appeal may end up in lawyers pockets....

From what I know via some mutual acquaintances, she does not need the money at all. I also heard that her father had a reputation for shady deals.

I still think that there was enough reasonable doubt, but either the jury felt otherwise, or Switt's lawyer dropped the ball.
 

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
86,171
59,937
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I wonder if the Jurers were Threatened.

Or just afraiid of the Government.

I Know My decision Before & It wouldn't have changed after.

Possession is 9/10 of the Law.

They belonged to the family :thumbsup:
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
jeff of pa said:
I wonder if the Jurers were Threatened.

Or just afraiid of the Government.

I Know My decision Before & It wouldn't have changed after.

Possession is 9/10 of the Law.

They belonged to the family :thumbsup:

"What the Langbords [were] trying to say here is it's not clear what happened, that there's at least a possibility the coins were just exchanged for ounces of gold," said Armen Vartien, general counsel of the Professional Numismatists Guild.
"The records are incomplete, inconclusive," he said. "No one can really know what happened, and none of the people involved are alive to tell (the tale)."


Here are some facts that were not published in the news recently:


Switt had been investigated at least twice by 1944 over his coin holdings.
In 1937, U.S. officials seized nearly 100 pre-1933 double eagles from him as he prepared to board a train to Baltimore to meet with a coin dealer. Switt said he knew it was illegal to possess the gold coins, and said he had eventually planned to surrender them, according to a ruling issued by the trial judge this week.
In 1944, the Secret Service traced 10 separate double eagle coins that had surfaced to Switt. He acknowledged selling nine of them, but said he did not recall how he had gotten them. The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt.
However, his license to deal scrap gold, which sometimes took him to the Mint, was revoked.
U.S. District Judge Legrome Davis [allowed] that evidence in, despite the family's efforts to block it.
"The documents appropriately go to Switt's knowledge of the repercussions from breaking the gold laws and provide evidence of a motive to conceal his possession of the 10 1933 Double Eagles presently at issue," Judge Legrome Davis wrote.


I know this is not the last we will be reading about this case. I think they will win the appeal based on the fact that evidence that was allowed should have been blocked.
 

jeff k

Bronze Member
Mar 4, 2006
1,264
18
Florida
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
No doubt in my mind the coins were stolen from the Mint. I would have voted with the jurors.

P.S. O.J. was GUILTY. ;D
 

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
86,171
59,937
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Jeff K said:
No doubt in my mind the coins were stolen from the Mint. I would have voted with the jurors.

P.S. O.J. was GUILTY. ;D

Of course OJ was Guilty

Switt may have been also.

however

The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt.


Therfore in My Minds Eye the coins
no longer belonged to the mint either :thumbsup:
 

jeff k

Bronze Member
Mar 4, 2006
1,264
18
Florida
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
"The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt."

Apples & Oranges. There is no statue of limitations on ownership of stolen property. Why do you think items stolen by the Nazis during WWII are being returned to the rightful owners when possible. That's only common sense, and we are governed by common law. Those coins didn't "mysteriously float" into the possession of Switt.
 

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
Staff member
Dec 19, 2003
86,171
59,937
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Jeff K said:
"The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt."

Apples & Oranges. There is no statue of limitations on ownership of stolen property. Why do you think items stolen by the Nazis during WWII is being returned to the rightful owners when possible. That's only common sense, and we are governed by common law. Those coins didn't "mysteriously float" into the possession of Switt.

However without prosicution,
he was not Proven guilty of Theft.
there is still no proof he wasn't given the coins as a gift
From someone.

Except of course if you feel the government would never lie

of course You can have your opinion,
but i'll stick with mine

Until the mint Melts them down to prove
there was no Financial reason to steal them from the family :wink:
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Do I think Casey Anthony was guilty? Absolutely, but I cannot criticize the jury for acquitting her. The prosecution could not prove the case "beyond the shadow of a doubt". Same with OJ, and I feel the same way about the jury's decision in this case.

I do not have transcripts from this case to see on what grounds they were able to convince the jury, but my instincts tell me the decision will be overruled by a higher court.
 

TheHarleyMan2

Bronze Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,594
464
Never Know I May Live Next To You!
Detector(s) used
GTI 2500/Bounty Hunter
Minelab Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
What I don't understand is how (1) 1933 gold Double Eagle sold for $7.5 million in 2004? Where did that one come from if they were illegal to own?

If I was on the jury, I would bring up that very issue and rule in favor with the defense being the government didn't come in and "STEAL" the gold coin when it was put up for auction. The jury, 2 men and 8 women doesn't seem like a fair even jury, what happened to 5 men and 5 women as jurors? Isn't that supposed to be fair equal ethnicity, after all they have to have equal ethnicity all the way around in courts now a days, so they won't be able to have a "MISTRIAL"!
 

hombre_de_plata_flaco

Bronze Member
Apr 24, 2011
1,115
16
Georgia
Detector(s) used
Teknetics Delta 4000
TheHarleyMan2 said:
What I don't understand is how (1) 1933 gold Double Eagle sold for $7.5 million in 2004? Where did that one come from if they were illegal to own?

In 1934, FDR decided to recall, confiscate, and melt-down all US circulating gold coins. The 1933 Double Eagles had been minted, but not released into circulation. They were all (almost all) melted into bullion to store in US Treasury vaults. A handful of them escaped destruction - probably by the hands of a crooked Mint employee and this Switt character.

The US Government was able to round up most of the 1933 DE's back then, but one managed to find it's way into the hands of Egypt's King Farouk. Farouk was an avid coin collector (he also collected antique aspirin bottles) and was apparently immune to the US justice system. A coin dealer was later found to be in possession of one of these coins. I believe they busted him in NY trying to sell it. He claimed that he had gotten the coin from King Farouk, and the coin was in turn auctioned for 7.5 million, though I'm not sure who received the windfall of cash or who the buyer was.

So, the one coin in question was supposedly from the collection of Farouk.
 

K

Kentucky Kache

Guest
TheHarleyMan2 said:
The jury, 2 men and 8 women doesn't seem like a fair even jury, what happened to 5 men and 5 women as jurors?

Probably the same thing that happened to 12 men. What was wrong with men leading?
 

Sheldon J

Hero Member
Jul 18, 2009
897
599
Battle Creek, Mi
Detector(s) used
Mine lab, Garrett, Bounty Hunter,
jeff of pa said:
Jeff K said:
No doubt in my mind the coins were stolen from the Mint. I would have voted with the jurors.

P.S. O.J. was GUILTY. ;D

Of course OJ was Guilty
Switt may have been also.

however

The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt.


Therfore in My Minds Eye the coins
no longer belonged to the mint either :thumbsup:

No he wasn't but OJ knows who did it.... His son, look at the evidence....

Now imagine this, you have just been told by the government that all your gold coins are now illegal and must be surrendered, your investment must be turned over to the government at their set price... Would you...
A. bite the bullet and joyfully surrender them or...
B. you try to sell them for a profit to a buyer that is going to take them to a different country and are caught....
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
TheHarleyMan2 said:
What I don't understand is how (1) 1933 gold Double Eagle sold for $7.5 million in 2004? Where did that one come from if they were illegal to own?

The ironic thing is that Switt was involved with that sale as well.
 

mrs.oroblanco

Silver Member
Jan 2, 2008
4,356
427
Black Hills of South Dakota
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Lobo & Garrett Stinger
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Articles stolen by the Nazi's fell under the "war crimes and restitution" - which is why they are not under the statute of limitations.

That is not so with regular things. The statute of limitations had, indeed, been long, long over.

I hope the Supreme Court gets to hear this case.

Beth
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top