latest nickel box error haul

[port ewen ace]

not a Buff, "V", war to be found ---BUT_______ these will do just fine 95P long die crack rim through face to hair bow, 96P reverse die gouge, 95P greaser with nice die chip lump. also did 2 boxes of halves plus a dime box ---they were SKUNK

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[enamel7]

It would be better if you posted one coin at a time. You mention 3 coins but have photos of four. When people have to try to pick out which coin is which most people will just pass over the posting.

 

[port ewen ace]

the MAD (off center) should be obvious. the other 3 are to hopefully teach the viewer to look for what the defect is and then have it confirmed by my post. finding an error is a simple test of what is wrong with a coin and deducing the reason of how it could happen. PMD should always be the 1st test, then go from there. I am no expert, but errors are a constant learning vector with a straight line ramping upward. just sharing as I learn.

 

[mxh5891]

I'm definitely learning about errors and never heard of a die gouge. To me it just looks like a scratch on the last picture. Is that 1980 misaligned die worth anything? I only thought ones that have stuff missing where worth a small premium.

How many more boxes are left in this "stash" you have?

 

[port ewen ace]

die gouge is 1st photo--the raised line moving from N to N. last pic is just to show both sides of each coin. the MAD's sell for a few bucks and I only pull the coins with cropped letters. 5th photo is a nice die chip which shows as a raised "lump" along with the rivulets of grease flow. I have 6 boxes in hand with 14 still at the bank, will grab a few more this week. HH

I'm definitely learning about errors and never heard of a die gouge. To me it just looks like a scratch on the last picture. Is that 1980 misaligned die worth anything? I only thought ones that have stuff missing where worth a small premium.

How many more boxes are left in this "stash" you have?

 

[enamel7]

the MAD (off center) should be obvious. the other 3 are to hopefully teach the viewer to look for what the defect is and then have it confirmed by my post. finding an error is a simple test of what is wrong with a coin and deducing the reason of how it could happen. PMD should always be the 1st test, then go from there. I am no expert, but errors are a constant learning vector with a straight line ramping upward. just sharing as I learn.

Ok, let's try this another way. I'm not arguing with you. As a long time member on this and other forums I can tell you when you show many pictures together and list several errors most people will move on instead of straining their eyes. List one post at a time for each coin. If you are trying to teach others it will be easier to get them to look that way. You responded the first one was a MAD which was self explanatory. Not if you're new to error coins. The MAD may have a slight increase in value, but the rest are actually quite common and rarely have any increased value. I also understand you are new to errors and varieties. I'm not. Just trying to help.

HH
enamel7

 

[Immy]

Have to agree that better placement of pics would be more reader-friendly. Since the errors aren't all immediately apparent, I found myself confused which were which.

It's pretty simple (and much more helpful) to align things like this:


(Caption)

(Caption)

(Caption)

(Caption)

You get the idea. Just trying to avoid confusion and assist those also learning about errors.