Marine to Gun-grabber Di Feinstein: No Maam

[Red James Cash]

Marine to Gun-grabber Di Feinstein: 'No Ma'am'

Marine to Gun-grabber Di Feinstein: 'No Ma'am'

by Warner Todd Huston 31 Dec 2012

Joshua Boston, a retired Corporal in the U.S. Marine Corps, has a message for Senator Dianne Feinstein (D, CA) concerning her newest gun banning bill. Corporal Boston says, "No Ma'Am."

Boston posted an open letter to Senator Feinstein at CNN's ireport site on December 27 to let DiFi know that he, at least, would not submit to the government denuding him of his Second Amendment rights.

Boston informed Sen. Feinstein that he will not register his weapons nor does he believe the Senator or anyone else in government has the right to require him to do so. Boston also scoffed at someone proclaiming "the evil of an inanimate object" even as she bestows upon herself the ability to carry a gun in contravention to her own proclamations.

"I am not your subject," Boston insists. "I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America."

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

Mr. Boston's message intrigues and he has even more to say than his open letter reveals. I took the occasion of his open letter to reach out to this brave member of our military. Here is our conversation:

Warner Todd Huston: What drove you to post this reply to Senator Feinstein?

Joshua Boston: I've been seeing this nonsense about gun control in the news since forever. Senator Feinstein regularly touts the effectiveness of the first Assault Weapons Ban while pointing out the "loopholes." So she proposes this new ban legislation. Given the tragedy that happened recently it has considerably more traction with folks, most who rely in some major way on emotions and what they're being told by the media about these "Weapons of Mass Destruction." My Windham Weaponry SRC sits in my home loaded and ready to be used should the need ever arise. It does not make me a criminal.

I'm sick of being told by people in Washington D.C. what is okay for me to own for my own personal defense while they enjoy the safety of many armed guards with better firearms than I have access to. It's hypocritical.

WTH: In your opinion, what do you think the Second Amendment is for?

JB: Looking at the founder's times and what they had just gone through, it was something they put in there for us should we ever find ourselves in their shoes and have to reassert, because of whatever manifestation of tyranny, our inherent right to freedom and liberty.

WTH: Do you support concealed carry laws?

JB: I hold a CHL with the state of Texas. I would prefer there not be a bureaucratic apparatus whose hoops I have to jump through so that I may defend myself should the need ever arise outside of my home. Who are these legislators to tell me that I may not defend myself outside of my home because they don't have my fingerprints on file?

WTH: Do you believe in any sort of gun restrictions?

JB: The only gun restriction I would favor is one in which only VIOLENT felons are prevented from purchasing or possessing a firearm. Other than that, why does the government or the police need them if I am not allowed to have one?

WTH: Some liberals say regular Americans shouldn't be allowed to have guns because they aren't trained. As a trained member of the military yourself, do you think average citizens have the ability to use guns correctly?

JB: Despite the training I received while in the Marines, I am a regular American. I am not exceptional. I am not superior. I am an American just like any other citizen. I've seen "average citizens" use guns extraordinarily efficiently when I go to the range. This is because they are responsible people who seek knowledge when they don't know something. So yes they have the ability, and they should be able to purchase whatever weapons they deem sufficient for their needs.

WTH: Some people fear that government will use the military to forcibly disarm the public if gun banning laws get passed. What is your sense of your fellows in the armed forces. Do you think they'd follow orders to forcibly disarm the public?

JB: In my 8 years of service I could probably count on one hand the number of people that I met who would forcibly disarm the American public. The vast majority of American service members that I know and that I served with recognize that the Constitution is what we pledge to obey.

WTH: Do you feel that there will be any retaliation by the Marines for having posted your reply?

JB: I was honorably discharged on July 31st of this year. I'd certainly hope they wouldn't "retaliate" in any way because I am doing my civic duty and keeping myself informed. I think that would go against our motto: "Honor Courage and Commitment"

WTH: Any other thoughts?

JB: I just hope that our elected representatives do not vote for this heinous attempt to make me and my fellow Americans defenseless against predators and criminals.

We at Breitbart salute Joshua Boston and hope that he is not uncommon among the members of our illustrious armed forces.

Below is the full text of Corporal Boston's original open letter:

Senator Dianne Feinstein,

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.

Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[Dano Sverige]

" My Windham Weaponry SRC sits in my home loaded and ready to be used should the need ever arise. It does not make me a criminal."

It does if they ban them, and as a "criminal" he shouldn't have legal access to firearms! Like many of you, the poor man is delusional and very confused! He seems to be under the impression that being asked to register his weapon amounts to a total gun ban. He seems to be under the impression that failure to register will leave him unarmed and defenceless.
Dear mr Boston,
please use all your past military training to find some common sense. If the bill passes....register the damn gun and still have it when and if you ever need it! Move with the times. Don't become a criminal out of sheer stubborness!

Dano sverige
3 year veteran of TNET and all it's lunatics.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

AND! Not an ACTIVE Marine... "honorably discharged on July 31st of this year..."; PRIVATE citizen... CAN NOT use "Cpl, USMC".

 

[spartacus53]

Or, the next time we here from him is when he goes postal for being ordered to register his weapons, and goes down in a blaze of glory

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

I agree with him, I will not register mine as all of my many friends who also own have also stated.

The only opinions on this that really matter are Americans that own weapons.

"The right to keep and bear arms shall NOT BE INFRINGED".

 

[dieselram94]

I agree with him, I will not register mine as all of my many friends who also own have also stated.

The only opinions on this that really matter are Americans that own weapons.

"The right to keep and bear arms shall NOT BE INFRINGED".

Well said, TH!

 

[dieselram94]

Dano, if you believe TNET is full of lunatics as you say. I will ask a simple but direct question. Why do you stay? Oh, I get it you have included yourself in that description. Lol!

 

[Dano Sverige]

@TH - That's a perfect example of selfish,insular thinking, the kind of thing that has gotten Americans a very bad reputation worldwide for having a lack of worldly knowledge.

@Diesel - I stay because i have a bit of fun here sometimes to relieve the stress of online gaming and life etc. The lunatics here can always be relied on for a chuckle or two.

 

[dieselram94]

Dano, I don't do online gaming so I guess I can't relate. But I definatly disagree most on Tnet are not lunatics. The very fact you can still post throws your claims moderators are against you and biased right in the water.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

@TH - That's a perfect example of selfish,insular thinking the kind of thing that has gotten Americans a very bad reputation worldwide for having a lack of worldly knowledge.

@Diesel - I stay because i have a bit of fun here sometimes to relieve the stress of online gaming and life etc. The lunatics here can always be relied on for a chuckle or two.

Dano, our rights guaranteed to us by our Bill Of Rights are ours, it is none of the rest of the worlds business, our Bill of Rights are not open for debate by the world, we don't care what the rest of the world thinks about it.

There are millions of people trying to come to America so they can have freedoms we enjoy.

The world will think bad of us untill they once again need America to save their butts, the free world already rests under our nuclear protection.

As far as your statement on my lack of worldly knowledge, we stop caring what you and other Englishmen thought in 1776 after kicking you out of our country.

 

[G.A.P.metal]

A sheriff pulled over a 90 year old woman,while looking at her drivers license he noticed she had a permit to carry a hand gun.
He said do you have any guns with you today,she said i have a 357 mag. in the console, a 44 cal. in the glove compartment and a 38 in my purse.
The Sheriff said to her What are you afraid of.... she said with a smile im not afraid of anything.
Gary

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Good one GAP.

I'm 64, I would rather end my days standing up for our Bill of Rights, than live to be 90 wearing diapers with the Bill of Rights destroyed.

 

[releventchair]

Register because that would reduce violence how?
Anyone go to the aid of the unarmed getting literally unarmed by machetes? How many dead and the world turns its back.
Ethnic cleansing,genocide,not ever gong to happen again right. I don,t see us as insular Dano,selfish toward self preservation sure. We took what worked best in our opinion in forming constitution and rights. Some from native confederacy views,some from british views,(jury for example) as the world and constant conflict were (and still are not)never out of sight there were likewise other influences. Part of securing rights included in rights as a fire stop. If you have been involved in bylaw changes of an organization what becomes can be far from original intent when original mission subjected to new interpretation by members who want a different organization but want to keep grounds and facility. Yes change is inevitable but will be contested when rights of law abiding are affected while criminals are not. As who ever wrote(sorry i have no name to quote) we are treating the symptoms and not the disease. And another unnamed quote. Leaders who disagree should have to fish together in their underwear.

A strong undercurrent here is a concern when regulating tools that can be used for good and evil, that is getting a fair trial by an impartial jury.