Danimal
Bronze Member
Matching baby and Mother's rings-what was the circumstance how they were lost?
I know some of you "dig" more than just the digging involved in this hobby, well so do I...
I find myself often wondering the whys and hows involved in the objects I unearth as to HOW they got there in the first place, how sad the original owner must have been at the time it was lost, etc. Usually it comes down to a single event where the object was dropped, the possible search and final resignation and continuance of their daily routines.
Sometimes though it seems that there must have been something more surrounding the facts on how and why.
yesterday at lunch I was working near a old homestead in an overgrown wooded area near where I work, and found two rings. Since starting THing 5 months ago, I have already found over 30 rings, so I wasn't totally floored at the find, although one was a tiny baby's ring and quite fine in detail.
It wasn't until last night when I took them home, cleaned them and broke out the Simichrome polish that the real detail appeared. On the inner band of each ring was the same "sterling->MH<-" mark, indicating to me they were a set. Also, both rings bore hearts, and the hearts were the exact same shape. So...obviously, (to me at least) this was a mother/baby ring set. They were found about 15 feet apart, and both dug at about 7" deep.
Why were both there? I doubt that both were lost at the same time. I doubt that both were lost at seperate times. Did the baby remove it's ring and also pull mommy's ring off and toss it?
Before I let my imagination run rampant, I'd like to hear YOUR ideas on how they both ended up underground near each other at similar depths.
Assume they are a set.
Here's a pic to give you an idea of how very tiny and fine the baby's sterling ring actually is.
I know some of you "dig" more than just the digging involved in this hobby, well so do I...
I find myself often wondering the whys and hows involved in the objects I unearth as to HOW they got there in the first place, how sad the original owner must have been at the time it was lost, etc. Usually it comes down to a single event where the object was dropped, the possible search and final resignation and continuance of their daily routines.
Sometimes though it seems that there must have been something more surrounding the facts on how and why.
yesterday at lunch I was working near a old homestead in an overgrown wooded area near where I work, and found two rings. Since starting THing 5 months ago, I have already found over 30 rings, so I wasn't totally floored at the find, although one was a tiny baby's ring and quite fine in detail.
It wasn't until last night when I took them home, cleaned them and broke out the Simichrome polish that the real detail appeared. On the inner band of each ring was the same "sterling->MH<-" mark, indicating to me they were a set. Also, both rings bore hearts, and the hearts were the exact same shape. So...obviously, (to me at least) this was a mother/baby ring set. They were found about 15 feet apart, and both dug at about 7" deep.
Why were both there? I doubt that both were lost at the same time. I doubt that both were lost at seperate times. Did the baby remove it's ring and also pull mommy's ring off and toss it?
Before I let my imagination run rampant, I'd like to hear YOUR ideas on how they both ended up underground near each other at similar depths.
Assume they are a set.
Here's a pic to give you an idea of how very tiny and fine the baby's sterling ring actually is.
Attachments
Upvote
0