Well, Vox, maybe it´s time you show your sources or links where you base this kind of complot.
trinidad said:Well, Vox, maybe it´s time you show your sources or links where you base this kind of complot.
mariner said:Vox,
That all sounds very complicated. As far as I can tell, there is no link between Sea Hunt and Odyssey, and between Juno/La Galga and Mercedes,
except to the extent that Spain has used the same 1902 Treaty as part of its argument in both cases.
And I still don't understand why Spain would have offered a salvage contract to Sea Hunt in 2003 when the Court of Appeals gave them full rights over those wrecks in 2000. I do not believe that financial gain has been Spain's motivation in their interventions over the last five years or so, and I cannot understand why they would have wanted to let Sea Hunt salvage any of their wrecks.
Mariner
Alexandre said:Seahunter said:Alexandre
A nice list, but I think you missed the point. Could you show us a report and the photos to go with it, or is that for archaeologists only? We could all learn something here if you would share with us.
Seahunter
Seahunter
As I have posted above, I have some of those documents online (link also above).
Also, I have posted a lot of photographs here on TNET, look for example, for the Namibia Shipwreck Update thread
Jeff K said:
trinidad said:Vox, we've already read the garbage. The stuff (I wont call that information) wrote on ABC (even with spies and all) is exactly that. And being you an expert researcher on AGI and Simancas, that worked for all kind of companies, it sounds at least "rare" that you agree with the "sound" of this article, that is something close to a "big brother" on that kind of institutions.
trinidad said:I didn't say a thing about the great researcher Victoria Stapell is. That goes with out saying. I've just said that the article is a piece of sh... And yes, I remember how easy it was to get a credential to obtain the old "carnet de investigador". Not big deal. I think information must available for everyone. If not, we have the danger that someone would propose to keep it in monasteries or something like that. Why I have to tell anybody the object of an investigation of mine if I want to keep it confidential? Why I have to get exposed to somebody eye if I don't want it? To see and study historical files should never be a question of preventive security. It's not the knife but the hand that use the knife what kill somebody or just cut the bread. And you give for stated that Victoria Stapell was misleaded or something. Don't run so fast and wait for the end of the show. Anyway, did you know the whole truth when you researched for the people aboard the Louise? I'm sure you didnt because, as you, I think there should be forbidden to consult historical documents with an illegal purpose. I say more, it should be forbidden anything that comes with an illegal purpose. Categorically, illegal purposes should be illegal.
Panfilo said:Do the Spanish bureaucrats actually believe that closing down or limiting the access to their historical archives will curtail the ongoing plunder of their underwater cultural heritage?
The Information should be there to benefit people that use it correctly and not for commercial gain.trinidad said:Do you have any proposal, Ossy? Only the "right" people could go into an historical file? Who will decide the "right" people"? It sound scary and medieval.