Panning the police blotter

The Gilded Lens

Sr. Member
Oct 13, 2014
476
815
The Sierra Nevadas
Detector(s) used
Garrett 14" Pan, Garrett 15" Super Sluice Pan, Bazooka 36" Sniper,
Hand Dredge
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
A co-worker showed me the police blotter today because there was mention of prospecting. Things are getting ridiculous!! No, it wasn't me, I was being a good girl and working.

Calling the cops because someone with an over glorified pie tin stirring up the water is no reason to the cops. I got a huge laugh out of this but it also really bothers me. Granted I don't know exactly where this person was panning. There is a bridge there and a lot of wooded area so it could be private property but it sounds more like this was reported by some doofus passerby who was concerned about "pollution". Not sure why the panner had a wheelbarrow, bad move.


Oh yeah, then they had this article on the front page:
http://www.theunion.com/news/15107931-113/epa-grants-to-allow-contamination-cleanup-in-grass-valley

Discussion?
 

Attachments

  • image-3095947927.jpg
    image-3095947927.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 106
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RustyGold

Gold Member
Aug 16, 2013
9,372
10,901
Southern California
Detector(s) used
XP Deus I & II
Xterra Pro
Primary Interest:
Other
Scary!! Maybe they will use the money to tell people to clear their lot/land of all the polluting trees! "It's obscuring our view"!:laughing7:
 

goldenmojo

Bronze Member
Dec 9, 2013
1,866
4,755
N. California
Detector(s) used
Bazooka Prospector-Sniper-Supermini Thanks Todd & Chris, Goldhog Multisluice Thanks Doc, My Land Matters Thanks Claydiggins, 6 Senses
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
A co-worker showed me the police blotter today because there was mention of prospecting. Things are getting ridiculous!! No, it wasn't me, I was being a good girl and working.

Calling the cops because someone with an over glorified pie tin stirring up the water is no reason to the cops. I got a huge laugh out of this but it also really bothers me. Granted I don't know exactly where this person was panning. There is a bridge there and a lot of wooded area so it could be private property but it sounds more like this was reported by some doofus passerby who was concerned about "pollution". Not sure why the panner had a wheelbarrow, bad move.


Oh yeah, then they had this article on the front page:
EPA grants to allow contamination cleanup in Grass Valley | TheUnion.com

Discussion?


TGL I know a great place you can at.......
 

2cmorau

Bronze Member
Nov 8, 2010
1,608
1,294
Camptonville, CA
Detector(s) used
GMT&GM3 Whites MXT Pro, Shadow X5, Fisher 1280, OMG and the TDI
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
WOW
TGL, thanks for posting
“This is to everyone’s benefit,” said Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin, CEO of The Sierra Fund, a partner in the project. “We’re making these properties safer
“There will be a question and answer session following the presentation,” she added.
 

russau

Gold Member
May 29, 2005
7,281
6,743
St. Louis, missouri
After reading the article that TGL posted im thinking everyone should apply for one of those EPA grants to clean up the bad stuff in the streams there! one city got $400,000. Heck I could run my dredge all season for 1/2 of that and have plenty of helpers doing the same!:hello2:
 

goldenIrishman

Silver Member
Feb 28, 2013
3,465
6,152
Golden Valley Arid-Zona
Detector(s) used
Fisher / Gold Bug AND the MK-VII eyeballs
Primary Interest:
Other
To quote the article...

This is the second round of EPA grants for brownfields assessments in Grass Valley. The city previously managed a 2009 grant totaling $400,000 that resulted in the clearing of several properties for redevelopment.

What I wonder is just who were the developers and why didn't THEY clean up the properties out of their own pockets? Would be interesting to "Follow the money" on this and see if they just happen to have ties to "Izzy" and TSF. If they do/did, I would think that would constitute a conflict of interest as well as a misappropriation of government funds since the EPA paid for the cleanups.
 

Hefty1

Bronze Member
Dec 5, 2010
1,702
1,477
To quote the article...

This is the second round of EPA grants for brownfields assessments in Grass Valley. The city previously managed a 2009 grant totaling $400,000 that resulted in the clearing of several properties for redevelopment.

What I wonder is just who were the developers and why didn't THEY clean up the properties out of their own pockets? Would be interesting to "Follow the money" on this and see if they just happen to have ties to "Izzy" and TSF. If they do/did, I would think that would constitute a conflict of interest as well as a misappropriation of government funds since the EPA paid for the cleanups.

EPA didn't pay for it! You did, I did, We the people did! All our money! FOR WHAT?
 

BurntBear

Bronze Member
Jul 4, 2014
1,450
1,299
N.E. Tennessee
Detector(s) used
Shovels....lots of shovels!
Primary Interest:
Other
See, if you prospect on private property; you don't have these problems. If you do, you politely ask the officer to either pick up a shovel and get to digging; or kindly fly away.....
 

meMiner

Bronze Member
Jul 22, 2014
1,047
1,176
Port Perry, Ontario
Detector(s) used
Minelab 800,
Fisher CZ21, F75SE, Gold Bug 2.9 & Minelab GPX 5000
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Two observations. (1) why would an environmental project promote "brown" fields? (2) How is a tunnel an environmental hazard that a property owner can clean up?

About the poor fellow panning in the creek.
I wonder how many police cars they sent out to bust him? The funny thing is I don't know a spot in Canada where the only reason they would respond to a call like that would be curiosity, just to check out if he was finding anything. Next day, there might be a cop down there on his day off swirling dirt in a green pan. ;-)
 

goldenIrishman

Silver Member
Feb 28, 2013
3,465
6,152
Golden Valley Arid-Zona
Detector(s) used
Fisher / Gold Bug AND the MK-VII eyeballs
Primary Interest:
Other
EPA didn't pay for it! You did, I did, We the people did! All our money! FOR WHAT?

I hear ya brother! I kind of figured that most of the people on here already knew that it came from tax dollars.

BUT... That did get yet another thought running through my beady little brain here. Shouldn't the EPA be required to checkout who is getting these tax dollars and making sure that there is no conflict of interest with whomever is administrating these hand outs? We as miners are required to do our "Due Diligence" so why shouldn't people that are handling public funds (spelled tax dollars) have the same requirements?
 

Hefty1

Bronze Member
Dec 5, 2010
1,702
1,477
I hear ya brother! I kind of figured that most of the people on here already knew that it came from tax dollars.

BUT... That did get yet another thought running through my beady little brain here. Shouldn't the EPA be required to checkout who is getting these tax dollars and making sure that there is no conflict of interest with whomever is administrating these hand outs? We as miners are required to do our "Due Diligence" so why shouldn't people that are handling public funds (spelled tax dollars) have the same requirements?

I agree...but then they would have to due some work and be responsible for that work.
 

Maitland

Full Member
Mar 15, 2010
172
159
Black Hills, South Dakota
Detector(s) used
White's Silver Eagle, Fisher Gold Bug 2
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
It's a sad world we live in these days. I know of a few fellow prospectors where I live who have had law enforcement called on them for panning, the officers didn't do anything because they couldn't think of any crimes they were committing. I suppose calling in such a thing is just another feather in the cap of a tree-hugging liberal. Hopefully they don't wear gold jewelry, own any bullion, or use anything that uses microchips containing gold... where do they expect it comes from if they have a problem with mineral extraction?
 

2cmorau

Bronze Member
Nov 8, 2010
1,608
1,294
Camptonville, CA
Detector(s) used
GMT&GM3 Whites MXT Pro, Shadow X5, Fisher 1280, OMG and the TDI
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
anybody going to the meeting?
Who: Public Meeting, City of Grass Valley
What: U.S. EPA’s Brownfields Assessment Grants program
Where: Grass Valley City Hall, 125 East Main St.
When: 6 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 25
 

goldenIrishman

Silver Member
Feb 28, 2013
3,465
6,152
Golden Valley Arid-Zona
Detector(s) used
Fisher / Gold Bug AND the MK-VII eyeballs
Primary Interest:
Other
It's a sad world we live in these days. I know of a few fellow prospectors where I live who have had law enforcement called on them for panning, the officers didn't do anything because they couldn't think of any crimes they were committing. I suppose calling in such a thing is just another feather in the cap of a tree-hugging liberal. Hopefully they don't wear gold jewelry, own any bullion, or use anything that uses microchips containing gold... where do they expect it comes from if they have a problem with mineral extraction?

Since we are supposed to have the right to "Face our accusers" I think that the police should be required to divulge just who called in any complaint of these types. Anyone that calls in more than say three complaints where no laws are actually being broken should have to pay a fine (to off set the officers time) and attend a class (at their own expense) on the laws dealing with whatever the complaints were about. In this case it would be mining law. Maybe, just maybe, this would in time teach the wannbe Eco-terrorists to mind their own business or at least get it right instead of doing it out of spite. We can't do the "Cry Wolf" thing and ignore them after all. Even that kid was right from time to time.
 

Last edited:
OP
OP
The Gilded Lens

The Gilded Lens

Sr. Member
Oct 13, 2014
476
815
The Sierra Nevadas
Detector(s) used
Garrett 14" Pan, Garrett 15" Super Sluice Pan, Bazooka 36" Sniper,
Hand Dredge
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Two observations. (1) why would an environmental project promote "brown" fields? (2) How is a tunnel an environmental hazard that a property owner can clean up? About the poor fellow panning in the creek. I wonder how many police cars they sent out to bust him? The funny thing is I don't know a spot in Canada where the only reason they would respond to a call like that would be curiosity, just to check out if he was finding anything. Next day, there might be a cop down there on his day off swirling dirt in a green pan. ;-)

Agreed. Grass Valley has enough tunnels under that given a large earthquake it would be an underground city. I'm not sure why they would label (well we know why) old tunnels as brown fields or why they are encouraging property owners to mess with them.

Thinking about heading up for the meeting but I work til 6pm on that night. Would be really great for the miners to have a large presence there.
 

Clay Diggins

Silver Member
Nov 14, 2010
4,888
14,264
The Great Southwest
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
It's a sad world we live in these days. I know of a few fellow prospectors where I live who have had law enforcement called on them for panning, the officers didn't do anything because they couldn't think of any crimes they were committing. I suppose calling in such a thing is just another feather in the cap of a tree-hugging liberal. Hopefully they don't wear gold jewelry, own any bullion, or use anything that uses microchips containing gold... where do they expect it comes from if they have a problem with mineral extraction?

If they made a phone call they used gold. All the packet switching computers use gold as well as the phone they called on. Probably more gold was used by the caller to complain than was found by the person panning. :laughing7:

Lot's of community snoops in California working for free. All of them used mined metals to do their snooping and complaining.

Heavy Pans
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top