Took A Month to Get It

fsa46

Full Member
Jan 10, 2011
247
272
Connecticut
Detector(s) used
Whites DFPI, 2 @ Excalibur II, 2 @ Sovereign GT w/ 10" & 8" Tornado coils, 2@ 10x12 SEF coils all on their own rods, Whites MXT Pro , 2@ Garrett Pro Pointers
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
003.JPG Took a month to get it but I'm happy to break the ice. This tiny 18K, 1.89 g ring was deeeep and came in as a bottle cap on my GT. I dig everything EXCEPT a null on the GT and it has paid big dividends for me in the past.

This ring was found Saturday and just posted because of problems with my PC. The same day you were out Lorraine, but I was bundled up and comfortable.

You can tell Winter hunting is taking a toll on my hands by looking at the pic.
 

Upvote 0

bigdisco00

Jr. Member
Jan 23, 2014
94
22
Miami
Detector(s) used
Garret gti 2500 with eagle eye. Diver detector soon to come!
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
nice!! good luck on future hunts
 

lorraine

Silver Member
Dec 15, 2010
4,470
3,762
Detector(s) used
Minelab GT; Sov Elite
Primary Interest:
Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
That 's a great gold ring find, fsa46:headbang: ; I like the style of that one

Lorraine
 

Showtime2385

Bronze Member
Nov 19, 2013
1,586
1,479
NY
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-Trac, Garrett AT-Pro, Garrett Pro-pointer-AT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Nice, Congrats!
 

SusanMN

Silver Member
Jun 1, 2007
4,534
4,098
Minnesota
Detector(s) used
Tiger Shark, Xterra 705, Makro Legend
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
That is a beautiful little ring. Looks like it might have some age to it.
 

OP
OP
F

fsa46

Full Member
Jan 10, 2011
247
272
Connecticut
Detector(s) used
Whites DFPI, 2 @ Excalibur II, 2 @ Sovereign GT w/ 10" & 8" Tornado coils, 2@ 10x12 SEF coils all on their own rods, Whites MXT Pro , 2@ Garrett Pro Pointers
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
005.JPG

Many thought it might be an older ring, I did not. However, after taking another close up and posting on another site something interesting was pointed out. CJ thought it might be 7 2 3 , possibly being 1933. After looking a little closer you can see 7 2 30. I didn't notice the 0 until I looked a littler closer.

I think they might be right, may be older than I originally thought.
 

lost items recovery

Bronze Member
Nov 29, 2012
1,295
644
Primary Interest:
Other
<img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=937129"/> Many thought it might be an older ring, I did not. However, after taking another close up and posting on another site something interesting was pointed out. CJ thought it might be 7 2 3 , possibly being 1933. After looking a little closer you can see 7 2 30. I didn't notice the 0 until I looked a littler closer. I think they might be right, may be older than I originally thought.

Extra nice!
Congrats!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top