Of course it isn't just California ... it's happening in your state too. But why is it happening at all?
People observe the impact of something and sometimes don't look deep enough for the answers. One case in point is the mining issues you are all running up against. Your mining rights are just the tip of the iceberg in a bigger picture.
Clear and present danger. One step below a state of emergency. Clear and present dangers are identified when one is under siege and laws passed to attempt to stop or mitigate the threat. One of those laws in California, involved organized crime such as the influence of drugs, drug gangs and cartel influences. Another is a law passed in California that identified the threat of organized crime and gangs as well as foreign governments, attempting to gain influence in the legal and political structure of the state of California by gaining positions of influence in public entities, such as law enforcement officers and officials, judges, regulators, politicians, etc.
The Clear and Present danger threat to the usurping and subversion of power in the state was so clearly threatening, that there was an amendment made to the constitution of the state of California to require additional paragraphs for the Oath of Office that required the public employee to disclose any affiliations with crime groups, gangs, subversive groups, etc. It is the Oath of Office in Article XX of the California State Constitiuion. Here it is:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_20
Here is the relevant part:
"... And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate,
nor
am I a member of any party or organization, political or other-
wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the
United States or of the State of California by force or violence
or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately
preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not
been a member of any party or organization, political or other-
wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the
United States or of the State of California by force or violence
or other unlawful means except as follows:
________________________________________________________________
(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions")
and that during such time as I hold the office of ______________
________________________________ I will not advocate nor become
(name of office)
a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise,
that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United
States or of the State of California by force or violence or
other unlawful means." ...
The state of California long ago recognized that persons (foreign and domestic) would attempt to imbed themselves in positions of power and use their influence to manipulate the government, it's legal system and laws to fulfill their agenda.
So why does California lead other states in these kinds of issues where the rights of American Citizens are put in jeopardy?
Why? There are a few reasons. First it is one of the richest states, secondly, it has a huge portion of it's population that are new to life in the US because they are immigrants and who are not likely to challenge such things, but mostly because of the liberal influence in the state (hollywood has a great impact on what you and I consume in entertainment and can easily polarize people against such things as gun rights and mining by demonizing them) and the fact that most US law follows California laws and decisions made there! Do a bit of research and you will find that that is true.
So, you have a hotbed of subversive efforts focusing in California to set legal precedent for the rest of the USA, with lots of money available, a citizenry for the most part that is complacent enough to allow it to occur and the most powerful place in the USA to establish a beachhead for the subversion and have an entrenched foothold in the USA.
My ex-father in law, who was in an important position in the US Forest Service. During a conversation regarding ecology and why public roads in Idaho were gated and locked to prevent public access, though these were public lands, he stated that "I can take the facts, cherry pick them as I like, and submit a report that will prove that either the impact of those roads and people traveling on them is a ecological disaster waiting to happen or that it is insignificant and is of very little consequence in the big picture of nature in Idaho. It all depends on what I want the report to accomplish or what I am told to do by my superiors..."
Another public employee I knew, in a senior and influential position in the BLM recreation department, once told me that the government was trying to get people out of the wilderness and restrict them to private lands, and although a public dirt road may exist, when it washed out he did not have to spend money to fix it, and so over time, would eventually become impassable and therefore unusable and would thus become inaccessible to the public, accomplishing their objective, and that the law that makes it illegal for people to do 'road repair' (can't disturb the environment without a survey for threatened species, ecological impact reports, etc.) would insure that it stays impassable.
These are your public employees, who, using your tax money are either interpreting the established laws in a way that helps them to accomplish their agenda, or are in some cases, initiating legal actions or making arrests or in some way bringing into the court, cases that attempt to change these same laws. I mean what do they lose if they lose a case? Nothing. What do we lose if they win a case?? More of our rights. Does anyone else see anything fundamentally wrong with public employees using their positions to change our laws to suit themselves or their interpretations of the laws? Or to remove our rights? I do. Their oath is to uphold and defend the constitution, not to change it! The same applies to the laws we live under.
These were genuine american citizens in their own way trying to do their job well. What do you suppose happens if they were subversives?? Do any of you recognize that much of what is happening there is the influence of foreign governments? How much influence through money has China bought in the California legal and governmental infrastructure? Islamists? Communists? Organized crime? Cartels? Environmentalists? The ultra-wealthy? Does anyone care?
The catastrophe has already happened in California, and it's unlikely to be undone. Mining laws are not the only things being changed. I'm sorry to say but the Clear and Present Danger recognized long ago in the state of California has been realized and the subversive elements have pretty much won. I feel sorry for the majority of the citizenry in the state that is now subject to the takeover. Law abiding citizens blind sided by the powers at play in the world who made their state the beach-head in a war. They were blissfully unaware of it, too many complacent, and now the enemy is on their doorstep.
Your state is next and the attack on it is already well under way ...
If you are an american citizen get off your butt and put an end to this. Root out the subversives and get rid of them. If you are new to the USA, learn why the USA is great and help fight what is happening, or this country will turn into a bigger and more powerful version of the country you felt the need to flee from.
You see, part of the problem is knowing where to go and what to do to change the bad things that are happening today.
Now you know. Find these people and remove these people from power wherever they are. Can you? or perhaps the most relevant question is Will you...?
People observe the impact of something and sometimes don't look deep enough for the answers. One case in point is the mining issues you are all running up against. Your mining rights are just the tip of the iceberg in a bigger picture.
Clear and present danger. One step below a state of emergency. Clear and present dangers are identified when one is under siege and laws passed to attempt to stop or mitigate the threat. One of those laws in California, involved organized crime such as the influence of drugs, drug gangs and cartel influences. Another is a law passed in California that identified the threat of organized crime and gangs as well as foreign governments, attempting to gain influence in the legal and political structure of the state of California by gaining positions of influence in public entities, such as law enforcement officers and officials, judges, regulators, politicians, etc.
The Clear and Present danger threat to the usurping and subversion of power in the state was so clearly threatening, that there was an amendment made to the constitution of the state of California to require additional paragraphs for the Oath of Office that required the public employee to disclose any affiliations with crime groups, gangs, subversive groups, etc. It is the Oath of Office in Article XX of the California State Constitiuion. Here it is:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_20
Here is the relevant part:
"... And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate,
nor
am I a member of any party or organization, political or other-
wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the
United States or of the State of California by force or violence
or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately
preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not
been a member of any party or organization, political or other-
wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the
United States or of the State of California by force or violence
or other unlawful means except as follows:
________________________________________________________________
(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions")
and that during such time as I hold the office of ______________
________________________________ I will not advocate nor become
(name of office)
a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise,
that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United
States or of the State of California by force or violence or
other unlawful means." ...
The state of California long ago recognized that persons (foreign and domestic) would attempt to imbed themselves in positions of power and use their influence to manipulate the government, it's legal system and laws to fulfill their agenda.
So why does California lead other states in these kinds of issues where the rights of American Citizens are put in jeopardy?
Why? There are a few reasons. First it is one of the richest states, secondly, it has a huge portion of it's population that are new to life in the US because they are immigrants and who are not likely to challenge such things, but mostly because of the liberal influence in the state (hollywood has a great impact on what you and I consume in entertainment and can easily polarize people against such things as gun rights and mining by demonizing them) and the fact that most US law follows California laws and decisions made there! Do a bit of research and you will find that that is true.
So, you have a hotbed of subversive efforts focusing in California to set legal precedent for the rest of the USA, with lots of money available, a citizenry for the most part that is complacent enough to allow it to occur and the most powerful place in the USA to establish a beachhead for the subversion and have an entrenched foothold in the USA.
My ex-father in law, who was in an important position in the US Forest Service. During a conversation regarding ecology and why public roads in Idaho were gated and locked to prevent public access, though these were public lands, he stated that "I can take the facts, cherry pick them as I like, and submit a report that will prove that either the impact of those roads and people traveling on them is a ecological disaster waiting to happen or that it is insignificant and is of very little consequence in the big picture of nature in Idaho. It all depends on what I want the report to accomplish or what I am told to do by my superiors..."
Another public employee I knew, in a senior and influential position in the BLM recreation department, once told me that the government was trying to get people out of the wilderness and restrict them to private lands, and although a public dirt road may exist, when it washed out he did not have to spend money to fix it, and so over time, would eventually become impassable and therefore unusable and would thus become inaccessible to the public, accomplishing their objective, and that the law that makes it illegal for people to do 'road repair' (can't disturb the environment without a survey for threatened species, ecological impact reports, etc.) would insure that it stays impassable.
These are your public employees, who, using your tax money are either interpreting the established laws in a way that helps them to accomplish their agenda, or are in some cases, initiating legal actions or making arrests or in some way bringing into the court, cases that attempt to change these same laws. I mean what do they lose if they lose a case? Nothing. What do we lose if they win a case?? More of our rights. Does anyone else see anything fundamentally wrong with public employees using their positions to change our laws to suit themselves or their interpretations of the laws? Or to remove our rights? I do. Their oath is to uphold and defend the constitution, not to change it! The same applies to the laws we live under.
These were genuine american citizens in their own way trying to do their job well. What do you suppose happens if they were subversives?? Do any of you recognize that much of what is happening there is the influence of foreign governments? How much influence through money has China bought in the California legal and governmental infrastructure? Islamists? Communists? Organized crime? Cartels? Environmentalists? The ultra-wealthy? Does anyone care?
The catastrophe has already happened in California, and it's unlikely to be undone. Mining laws are not the only things being changed. I'm sorry to say but the Clear and Present Danger recognized long ago in the state of California has been realized and the subversive elements have pretty much won. I feel sorry for the majority of the citizenry in the state that is now subject to the takeover. Law abiding citizens blind sided by the powers at play in the world who made their state the beach-head in a war. They were blissfully unaware of it, too many complacent, and now the enemy is on their doorstep.
Your state is next and the attack on it is already well under way ...
If you are an american citizen get off your butt and put an end to this. Root out the subversives and get rid of them. If you are new to the USA, learn why the USA is great and help fight what is happening, or this country will turn into a bigger and more powerful version of the country you felt the need to flee from.
You see, part of the problem is knowing where to go and what to do to change the bad things that are happening today.
Now you know. Find these people and remove these people from power wherever they are. Can you? or perhaps the most relevant question is Will you...?
Last edited:
Upvote
0
