1999 d nickel error coin

JOE-DIRTDIGGER

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
215
Reaction score
20
Golden Thread
0
Detector(s) used
GARRETT AT PRO
GARRETT ACE 250
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • nickel die error1.webp
    nickel die error1.webp
    38.1 KB · Views: 1,024
  • nickel die error2.webp
    nickel die error2.webp
    68.5 KB · Views: 2,496
  • nickel die error3.webp
    nickel die error3.webp
    44.9 KB · Views: 518
I believe you have an Off-Center Second Strike Over and Off-Center First Strike, or III-L-4. I can see part of LIBERTY 1999 along the rim right of the second (final) strike. Bottom strike appears right of center, top strike appears to be left of center. My 2006 US Coin Values suggests prices of $10 and up. I don't know whether that would be higher today or not.
 

Thank you for that info. Did you get that from the red book or another source
 

I don't see the other strike. I think it's either a severely Mis-aligned Obverse Die (MAD) depending on what the reverse looks like. If the reverse is off center, it is then a minor off center. Either way, I don't think it's worth more than $4-5.



-Paul
 

here are some reveres pics, i dont notice anything wrong on the back, thanks for the input so far
 

Attachments

  • error nickel reverse1.webp
    error nickel reverse1.webp
    56.1 KB · Views: 934
  • error nickel2.webp
    error nickel2.webp
    55.7 KB · Views: 334
  • error nickel3.webp
    error nickel3.webp
    62 KB · Views: 353
I don't think its worth grading because grading costs fore than 5-10 dollars.
 

The reverse shows some doubling in the UM of UNUM. Notice that there are complete rims of the reverse, but not obverse. To me that strongly points to being double-struck at least. Also, the reverse strike is poor, something that should have been much clearer after multiple strikes. Perhaps there was grease on the entire face of the reverse?
 

The reverse shows some doubling in the UM of UNUM. Notice that there are complete rims of the reverse, but not obverse. To me that strongly points to being double-struck at least. Also, the reverse strike is poor, something that should have been much clearer after multiple strikes. Perhaps there was grease on the entire face of the reverse?


There is no doubling. It is a MAD error as I mentioned before. Worth a few dollars at most. If it were double struck you would see that the reverse is just as off-center as the obverse and you'd see much stronger evidence of doubling. I see absolutely none.


-Paul
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom