About issues with Skeptics and MFD: Conclusion

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Apparently your idea of "proof" is if you or another LRL promoter says so.
Show us the documentation of your so-called "proof," please.

Just part of the proof. http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,295484.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,393152.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,393139.0.html

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

I don't see how you relate posting entirely the same post one every thread, to me. I've never done that.

EE THr, reconsider your assumption that
logic or common sense occupies even the minutest
fragment of the mind that believes calculators send out
magic treasure locating beams.

These LRL believers have long ago departed from
reality, and there is NO chance they will ever attempt to
make the return trip.

Ok, so you changed a word or two, but close enough. Thanks for setting us straight Prong. Locating beams,,, you are really on top of this. Good job

 

[architecad]

Final conclusion

So, we had a final conclusion about those anti-MFD and LRL guys. The lost the content

Arch

 

[architecad]

Final conclusion

So, we had a final conclusion about those anti-MFD and LRL guys. The lost the content

Arch

The lost the content?

Somebody lose their dowsing wands??

 

[architecad]

Final conclusion

So, we had a final conclusion about those anti-MFD and LRL guys. The lost the content

Arch

The lost the content?

Somebody lose their dowsing wands??

Who uses such bad grammar, as "The lost the content", anyways?

 

[EE THr]

Final conclusion

So, we had a final conclusion about those anti-MFD and LRL guys. The lost the content

Arch

The lost the content?

Somebody lose their dowsing wands??

Who uses such bad grammar, as "The lost the content", anyways?

It's not much use asking Arch logical questions---he will want you to give him ten grand to answer them.

But of course, he says he's only here to "help" people.

 

[Saturna]

Art ... Hung ... and now Arch ...

They're your people Fenix.


Be proud.

 

[architecad]

Final conclusion

So, we had a final conclusion about those anti-MFD and LRL guys. The lost the content

Arch

The lost the content?

Somebody lose their dowsing wands??

Who uses such bad grammar, as "The lost the content", anyways?

It's not much use asking Arch logical questions---he will want you to give him ten grand to answer them.

But of course, he says he's only here to "help" people.

Answer my PM.

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Answer my PM.

Arch

I already did. Don't send any more.

Your last several were just nonsense flaming crap. Grow up.




A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

 

[architecad]

Answer my PM.

Arch

I already did. Don't send any more.

Your last several were just nonsense flaming crap. Grow up.




A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."

challenge is on!!

 

[EE THr]

Arch---

Don't mix PMs with posts.

If you have something to say, say it here.

 

[architecad]

Arch---

Don't mix PMs with posts.

If you have something to say, say it here.

This is a public forum to express anything you want to say;however, you're out of control with your words and rights. YOU'RE NOT INNOCENT. You're a 65 old and you should think about your life and how to behave with others. You should be an example in the society, not a "forum fighter". A man act like man and face any challenge, don't use as "shield" others to cover his cowardice or dodge any time from word to word to skip or cover from others.Your words and your believes about what you think insult the most time to the users. You don't want to accept it but it's the true. Remember this; I going to respect you as long you respect to me and others users in this forum, including sending PM to you. To insult a person no necessarily I have to talk in a bad language, I can insult you with diplomacy and well expressed ideas as usually you do with me and others members. Everybody is tired about you. Don't forget that.

Thanks and have a good night. Here I'm.

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Arch---

Don't mix PMs with posts.

If you have something to say, say it here.

This is a public forum to express anything you want to say;however, you're out of control with your words and rights. YOU'RE NOT INNOCENT. You're a 65 old and you should think about your life and how to behave with others. You should be an example in the society, not a "forum fighter". A man act like man and face any challenge, don't use as "shield" others to cover his cowardice or dodge any time from word to word to skip or cover from others.Your words and your believes about what you think insult the most time to the users. You don't want to accept it but it's the true. Remember this; I going to respect you as long you respect to me and others users in this forum, including sending PM to you. To insult a person no necessarily I have to talk in a bad language, I can insult you with diplomacy and well expressed ideas as usually you do with me and others members. Everybody is tired about you. Don't forget that.

Thanks and have a good night. Here I'm.

Arch

You are merely trying to evoke an emotional response from me.

Stick to LRLs, and the thread topic.





A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."