Are Your Federal Mining Claims Up For Grabs Next ??????

jog

Bronze Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
682
Golden Thread
0
Location
Tillamook Oregon
Detector(s) used
Whites MXT / GMT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
BREAKING: Obama Issues Executive Order Allowing Him To Grab Your Land
The Patriot April 29, 2014 BREAKING: Obama Issues Executive Order Allowing Him To Grab Your Land2014-04-29T06:27:17+00:00 News 97 Comments
In a press release from U.S. Congressman Rob Bishop, he announced that he uncovered 14 missing pages from an internal Department of Interior (DOI) memo. According to the release, the pages reveal that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may just be as land-hungry as we have all suspected—if not more so.
If the allegations in the report were proven to be true, it would reveal an enormous amount of what the BLM is truly about.
The release reads as follows:
Congressman Rob Bishop (UT-01), Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, today announced that he recently obtained the preceding 14 pages previously missing from an internal Department of Interior (DOI) memo leaked last February. The original document obtained in February by Bishop detailed planning within the DOI to use the Antiquities Act to potentially designate up to 13 million acres throughout the West as new national monuments. The newly obtained 14 pages further detail plans within the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to completely overhaul the way federal lands are managed in the U.S., including the creation of new ecosystem areas that require the acquisition of new federal lands. The plans would vastly expand the power, reach and control of federal land managers.
“These 14 pages are further evidence of this Administration’s efforts, under the guidance of Secretary Salazar, to control western lands by unilaterally locking them up without input from local residents and stakeholders nor the approval of Congress. Their plotting behind closed doors is disingenuous at best and flies in the face of this Administration’s so-called ‘transparency’,” said Congressman Bishop. “Thousands of westerners whose livelihoods depend upon access to our public lands stand to be affected by these decisions and yet this document blatantly goes out of its way to exclude their input or participation. If there was any question about whether or not this Administration has declared a war on the West, these new documents are evidence enough.”
The BLM is only one of the divisions of the DOI that have compiled similar memos. On February 26, 2010, Congressman Bishop, House Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Doc Hastings (WA-04) and other Western Caucus Members sent a letter to DOI Secretary Ken Salazar requesting all relative information pertaining to the DOI’s plans to designate new national monuments throughout the West. It has been more than five months since the request was made and the DOI continues to refuse to fully comply with the official document request.

“The reality is that this is NOT the complete set of documents pertaining to the Administration’s plans to overhaul the way public lands are managed in this country. We know that other documents like this are out there. We’ve requested them, but the folks at Interior continue to stonewall,” Bishop added. “My biggest concern is that if they’re willing to let documents this damning out from their safekeeping, they are surely protecting others that are far worse and even more revealing.”

Page 3, paragraph 6: The sentence, “In order to expand this network of treasured lands to include the diversity of landscapes currently managed by the BLM…,” shows that the Administration is working to broaden the jurisdictional scope of lands currently managed by the BLM.
Page 5, paragraph 5: The sentence, “Should the legislative process not prove fruitful, or if a nationally significant natural or cultural land resource were to come under threat of imminent harm, the BLM would recommend that the Administration consider using the Antiquities Act…,” shows that the Administration is constructing a new management structure without the approval of Congress.
Page 6 (b), page 7 (4.), page 8 (3.): Details planning for further land acquisition and funding mechanisms.
Page 7, paragraph 1; Page 6, paragraph 7: By their own numbers, the Administration will target the “acute” problem of private landholdings in BLM administered areas to the sum of 412,675 acres, or more than 370,000 football fields.
Page 9, paragraph 5: The sentence, “The BLM recommends that any major funding increases be phased in over a five-year period to allow the BLM time to build capacity in order to accomplish the increased work-load,” shows that the BLM will require an increase in funding to accommodate the proposed expanded management of lands throughout the West.

“I remain committed to forcing Secretary Salazar and all others involved in this matter into the light of full transparency, which as these documents prove, is not a place they seem to be comfortable,” Bishop concluded. “But this potential land and power grab needs to exposed, it needs to be laid out before the public, and it needs to be stopped
 

Upvote 0
Sound like these fools need to be impeached. Obama has already done enough Illegal thing to this country and has proven that he has no intention to honor or protect the Constitution which he has twice sworn to do in his oath of office. He is the lier we all thought him to be. He is not the first black president he is the first dictator of the Disfunctional States of Obama.
 

hes been VIOLATING his oath of office since he got into office and theres not enough socalled "represetatives" with a backbone to do anything about it! there probly isn't a handful of "representative" that haven't violated their own oath of office so theyre probly keeping their own heads down afraid of being pointed out!
 

Federal Mining Claim?

I want to call your attention to the fact that a federal mining claim is not a private claim but one owned by the U.S. government, the miner of which is an 'operator' under contract.

Grantees don't Claim federal land or maintain federal mining claims, those are federal, or U.S. Claims. In effect, by posting such a notice exampled by goldenIrishman on http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/g...-sample-jefferson-mining-district-oregon.html it says the U.S. owns the claim and you are just working it for the Feds.

Take a close look way down under the bottom line in the fine print of the “trespass” sign posted by goldenIrishman, and tell me, Whose claim are you telling others that is, really? And if you post that sign haven't you just given notice and changed your status from a grantee to that of an operator?

I'll be posting something else when I get to it regarding the No Trespass sign I posted that people are missing the points to. This Claim miss-designation and where a granted claim exists is, as is the improper interpretation and application of the 1955 Act, causing continued misunderstanding and real trouble.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom