kgunn said:True that bign, thats the direction im leaning, however with the addition of Edgar A. Poe either directly/ mainly indirectly adding fuel 2 it. With that out there, sure the dates r off but writing style (like a fingerprint) identifiable 2 that person... So whats your take on the whole website i previously posted? My theory is it has 2 b a document overlooked as the cipher to either C1 or C3, agreed? Furthermore it cant b 'Common Sense' bc that would lead directly back 2 Thomas Paine, who was the 1 w the hurt feelers 4 not being allowed 2 sign the Doi. Did so anyway w the intials tjb (on the back) n handprint (on the front), tjP again turn the 'P" upside down gives u 'b' for beale...
kgunn
Rebel - KGC said:![]()
![]()
Chatting about the "numbers" in the Ciphers (BC-1, BC-2, BC-3)? The Hart Papers has ONLY the "Beale Ciphers" w/o the "cover story".
![]()
![]()
Rebel - KGC said:![]()
![]()
LOL! HOWEVER... the HART PAPERS are MORE conductive to the "SECOND YEAR OF THE CONFEDERATE WAR "intro"; Newton Hazlewood (SGT. CSA "POSSIBLE" SPY) gave Clayton HART the sheets of numbers alluding to a "treasure" buried near his house (Peaks of Otter "area"); Clayton/George Hart MAY have changed the numbers slightly...
When reading the BEALE PAPERS... ONLY! You are "BOXED IN"
![]()
![]()
AND! HART = HEART; a GREAT KGC "indicator"!
![]()
![]()
Rebel - KGC said:![]()
![]()
SHHH! It's a SECRET!
![]()
![]()