What's new

Could use some help identifying an ancient coin, possibly from the Middle East

MarkDz

Sr. Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
336
Reaction score
80
Golden Thread
0
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Silver UMax
Hi all... I picked up this coin recently (I was treasure-hunting at a coin show, haha). It was with a group of Greek- and Roman-era coins, at least some of which were from the Middle East. It is about 13mm and bronze. It seems to match some aspects of several coins (prutahs, "widow's mites," etc.), but what puzzles me is that the narrow oval in the center is sharply raised compared to the rest of the worn-down coin. The other side is more or less "toasted." Have you ever seen something like this? Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • coin.webp
    coin.webp
    120.8 KB · Views: 63
Hi Don... Thanks for the reply. Sure, this is the other side. If you can make out anything on it I'll be very impressed!
 

Attachments

  • 20260818_144330.webp
    20260818_144330.webp
    120.5 KB · Views: 30
Looks to me to be a Judean prutah or, from the diameter, probably a half-prutah. Often the reverse has a half-opened lily flower as a symbol for Jerusalem, which is what I see on your coin.

If you Google those terms you'll see many variations of that with a multiplicity of possible obverses. Without any visible legend or clear obverse details it will be difficult to attribute, but these coins were mostly produced during the 1st Century BC.
 
Thank you, Red-Coat. That was my best guess also. There are just so many variations I started doubting the idea. Appreciate the info!
 
Leptons and prutahs are collectively referred to as Widow's Mites; yet there is no specific coin Widow's Mite.
The Romans small coin is a quadran, yet it's features do not resemble the OP's coin.
I use a totally unofficial way to distinquish between those three types with obscured images.
Lepton: smaller than a prutah; Prutah: 1-1.5 grams; and Quadrans: 1.5-4.0 grams.
These coins were carelessly and crudely struck, usually off center and clipped from small flans.
Your image, IMO, suggests either a lepton or a prutah by the obscure image and the two parallel clipped cuts.
Don in SoCal
 
The narratives of the widow giving all she had in the treasury of Herod’s temple described in the gospels of Mark and Luke are derived from texts originally written in Greek, since Judea had long been part of the Greek Empire until the Romans conquered Jerusalem in 63 BC. Judea then became a semi-autonomous client kingdom under Roman influence, but not under direct Roman imperial governance and taxation until around 41-44 AD.

The event is described as occurring in the final week of Jesus's life in Jerusalem, which puts it around 30 or 33 AD (although the gospel texts were composed decades later). The original Greek text references “λεπτὰ δύο (lepta duo)” using the plural rather than the singular “lepton”, indicating that she actually gave two coins. At the time, the coins in circulation in Jerusalem would have been a mixture of still-valid pre-Roman issues, subsequent Judean coins with Roman-approved designs or inscriptions, and (in lesser quantities) actual Roman coins.

“Lepton” literally means “small/thin” and the term was used generically, usually referring to the smallest fractional denomination copper coin in circulation in the Greek-speaking world, whatever the actual root currency denomination might have been. In Jerusalem at the time it was understood that there were 2 lepta to the prutah (ie the half-prutah was actually the smallest coin known as a lepton). Mark adds (for the benefit of Roman readers to emphasise how small the amount was) that these two coins equalled a quadrans (the smallest denomination Roman coin of the time) but this isn’t mentioned in the original Greek text. In fact, the exchange rate at the time between Roman and Judean currency was that 1 prutah equalled 1 quadrans, so it appears that Mark is by implication taking the coins to be to be half-prutahs, which is consistent with the use of the term “lepta” in the Greek texts.

The use of the word “mite” comes to us from the later English translation as the ‘King James Bible’, published in 1611. For the translators, the most suitable English word to describe a small coin was “mite”, which had entered the English vocabulary in the 14th Century from the Middle Dutch word meaning “a little bit" and originally used to describe a tiny Flemish copper coin of very low value.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom