Do The Math!

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Speaks volumes about how good of a "Treasure Hunter" you are

I know you are wrong..Are you Anything Else but a Skeptic?..Art

 

[EE THr]

~SWR~

Speaks volumes about how good of a "Treasure Hunter" you are

I know you are wrong..Are you Anything Else but a Skeptic?..Art

He is a person who knows the difference between fantasy and reality, that's not a "skeptic."

Learn to use a dictionary, con-artie.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

He is a person who knows the difference between fantasy and reality, that's not a "skeptic."

Your right. I know difference between fantasy and reality..So that makes you the skeptic..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Here's a math problem. 2 targets were found in this picture. No empty holes, no missed signals. Straight to the targets. What is the % as far as your math? If you understand probability, what were the odds? And lastly, how many spots would have been considered
as possible locations?

 

[EE THr]

Here's a math problem. 2 targets were found in this picture. No empty holes, no missed signals. Straight to the targets. What is the % as far as your math? If you understand probability, what were the odds? And lastly, how many spots would have been considered
as possible locations?

The answer is simple.

Zero percent.

I see no evidence of targets being found.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Let's put this word at the front. If How would any sort of proof alter the answer? Even if you had proof of the find, how would you know it wasn't the 1,000 try?

It's a math problem, like If a train and a bullet were,,,,,,

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

I agree with EE. There is nothing in the photograph indicating any "targets" were found, or that every square-inch was dug to eliminate the possibility of "missed targets" that were overlooked and not recovered.
Certainly, not a well thought out math problem.

Like I ask before..What has math to do with treasure hunting ?

 

[EE THr]

Let's put this word at the front. If How would any sort of proof alter the answer? Even if you had proof of the find, how would you know it wasn't the 1,000 try?

It's a math problem, like If a train and a bullet were,,,,,,

Let's put it even a better way---

If LRLs can't find one target, under ideal conditions (no interference), among ten known possible target locations in a random double-blind test, then how can one ever find a target in a wide open field, with millions of possible target locations?

Answer: You know where you planted the target that you miraculously "locate."

You are working against yourselves, fenix brothers. Keep going, you're helping your opponents a lot!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

If LRLs can't find one target, under ideal conditions (no interference), among ten known possible target locations in a random double-blind test, then how can one ever find a target in a wide open field, with millions of possible target locations?

So now you are defining Ideal conditions as Interference..Every trip in the field there are some type of interference..It maybe a power line, a fence with signs on it, a river that can not be crossed and many others. Oh yes..Please give me the GPS reading where I can go and find this field with millions of targets ?..

 

[fenixdigger]

I guess the question was too hard for them. Figures The 10,001 Post Prediction the stuff dreams are made of. ( For psychiatrist)

 

[EE THr]

I guess the question was too hard for them. Figures The 10,001 Post Prediction the stuff dreams are made of. ( For psychiatrist)

It's not a prediction that "if you lie, someone will call you on it." It's a certainty.

You might as well predict that the sun will rise tomorrow morning. Big deal. It's a false concept that you are actually predicting something.

Con artists, on the other hand could always see the light, get a life, and go straight. Although I don't have much hope for you guys. Remuneration for dishonesty is the bait for lost souls.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?

Could you please explain why the death rate for LRL’s made for Treasure Hunting is zero and the people who are required to use Double Blind testing is in the Millions ?

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?

Could you please explain why the death rate for LRL’s made for Treasure Hunting is zero and the people who are required to use Double Blind testing is in the Millions ?

Really? I thought I saw a funeral for an LRL just the other day. It was a cute little casket, but they couldn't find a minister who would say anything nice about it. And all they had served at the wake was Bud Light.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

It's funny how the right question has them cake walking to the couch.

The 10,001 Post Prediction---- Insults, excuses, transference, demands, denials, only the freshest ingredients in these Freudian

complexes. You go boys, BBFL's

Remember, it's not just predicted, but demanded by your conditions. That's why you can't get a handle on it.

 

[EE THr]

Could you please explain why the death rate for LRL’s made for Treasure Hunting is zero and the people who are required to use Double Blind testing is in the Millions ?

It's funny how the right question has them cake walking to the couch.

If that's what you call "the right question," then it's no wonder that you haven't figured out the LRLs don't work!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Thanks, but our Az. guy is working on that already. Time of day changes it.

I'm going to make up posts for you. That way the moron factor is gone. Kisses,,,

 

[aarthrj3811]

It’s real simple EE…We have looked at your Math and find that it is in error. Besides that your theories do not apply to using LRL Metal Detectors …Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

Just wondering if these rock formations are natural or man made?

 

[EE THr]

It’s real simple EE…We have looked at your Math and find that it is in error. Besides that your theories do not apply to using LRL Metal Detectors …Art

So, the folks who hate metal detectors are now calling their fake devices...metal detectors!

New LRL motto: If our musical ability is crap, we'll just change our tune!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Just wondering if these rock formations are natural or man made?

Wrong thread, con-artie.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?