DownNDirty
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2015
- Messages
- 2,178
- Reaction score
- 3,207
- Golden Thread
- 1
- Location
- South Carolina
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab Equinox 800
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
A couple of weeks ago I ventured out to try a new very early plantation permission. I had high hopes of finding some quality relics and was not disappointed; I wish all hunts were this good!
As is usually the case with colonial sites I found a couple of buttons and a brass buckle early on, along with plenty of square nails. Things were looking promising. Then I got a 20 something signal on the Equinox that had that alluring "dig me" tone to it. After about 10 minutes of working my way around and underneath a pesky root I finally extracted the target from 5-6 inches deep. To my pleasant surprise it was an annular buckle with a thin, wide layer of applied silver on the top.


For those of you not familiar with annular buckles they date back to medieval times, and Whitehead's buckle book gives a date range of 1350-1720. I did a good bit of searching the 'net, including the UK Portable Antiquities Scheme and was unable to find another example with applied silver so I feel comfortable in saying this is a fairly rare buckle. The thin silver layer is an amazing condition considering the buckle's age.
Needless to say I was pretty pumped and felt like if I didn't dig another relic I would go home happy, but of course I kept swinging the coil (lol). Not twenty minutes later I dug another target that I thought might be a pewter button-but it had an irregular shape to it. After I wiped the dirt off both sides and saw that there was no shank on it I looked closer and saw a very faint outline of a cross. That was when I did my second happy dance of the day-I had just dug my very first COB!


Fast forward to the next day-
The coin had a very stubborn greyish patina/crust on it that was very difficult to remove. I decided to soak it in lemon juice because it was silver and lemon juice wouldn't damage silver. After several soaks I noticed that the silver was disappearing and a distinct copper tint was beginning to show. It was then that I realized that the coin was a contemporary counterfeit instead of a real cob (pun intended). I was disappointed, but at least it was made during the same time period that cobs were minted-so it's still an interesting find.

Now back to the hunt...
Other finds included several buttons-one of which was an interesting square shape-and two other buckles

I also dug this very early lathing hammer/hatchet; here it is before and after electrolysis and preservation

Here are all of my finds from the day's hunt

Last weekend I did some scouting at another promising old site. The finds were few and far between but were enough to make me want to re-visit the spot.

A pewter spoon bowl, a sheet of lead that was folded over twice when I found it, and this interesting lead piece

It looks similar to a bale or bag seal but there are no markings and it is bigger and heavier than any seal that I have found to date. Ideas??
Definitely a fun couple of hunts. Time to get out there and do it again! Good luck to all of y'all-stay hydrated and dig something good.
As is usually the case with colonial sites I found a couple of buttons and a brass buckle early on, along with plenty of square nails. Things were looking promising. Then I got a 20 something signal on the Equinox that had that alluring "dig me" tone to it. After about 10 minutes of working my way around and underneath a pesky root I finally extracted the target from 5-6 inches deep. To my pleasant surprise it was an annular buckle with a thin, wide layer of applied silver on the top.



For those of you not familiar with annular buckles they date back to medieval times, and Whitehead's buckle book gives a date range of 1350-1720. I did a good bit of searching the 'net, including the UK Portable Antiquities Scheme and was unable to find another example with applied silver so I feel comfortable in saying this is a fairly rare buckle. The thin silver layer is an amazing condition considering the buckle's age.
Needless to say I was pretty pumped and felt like if I didn't dig another relic I would go home happy, but of course I kept swinging the coil (lol). Not twenty minutes later I dug another target that I thought might be a pewter button-but it had an irregular shape to it. After I wiped the dirt off both sides and saw that there was no shank on it I looked closer and saw a very faint outline of a cross. That was when I did my second happy dance of the day-I had just dug my very first COB!


Fast forward to the next day-
The coin had a very stubborn greyish patina/crust on it that was very difficult to remove. I decided to soak it in lemon juice because it was silver and lemon juice wouldn't damage silver. After several soaks I noticed that the silver was disappearing and a distinct copper tint was beginning to show. It was then that I realized that the coin was a contemporary counterfeit instead of a real cob (pun intended). I was disappointed, but at least it was made during the same time period that cobs were minted-so it's still an interesting find.

Now back to the hunt...
Other finds included several buttons-one of which was an interesting square shape-and two other buckles


I also dug this very early lathing hammer/hatchet; here it is before and after electrolysis and preservation


Here are all of my finds from the day's hunt

Last weekend I did some scouting at another promising old site. The finds were few and far between but were enough to make me want to re-visit the spot.

A pewter spoon bowl, a sheet of lead that was folded over twice when I found it, and this interesting lead piece


It looks similar to a bale or bag seal but there are no markings and it is bigger and heavier than any seal that I have found to date. Ideas??
Definitely a fun couple of hunts. Time to get out there and do it again! Good luck to all of y'all-stay hydrated and dig something good.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited:
Upvote
26