GARRETT 1500
- Thread starter kdismuke1
- Start date
Keppy
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Messages
- 8,318
- Reaction score
- 2,870
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- N.E. Ohio on lake Erie
- Detector(s) used
- ** WHAT ONE I FEEL LIKE ON HUNTING DAY *****
- Primary Interest:
- Other
When i had my 1500 i used it it worked fine got a little deeper not much but was that detector heavy with it on..........................................
utah hunter
Hero Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2007
- Messages
- 724
- Reaction score
- 11
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Utah county, Utah
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab x-terra 70, Fisher F75, eyes, brain
Gadabout - Jim said:
I agree, not much increase in depth and made a heavy detector even heavier. You cover more surface area, and the pinpointing was as good and easy as the stock coil.
Sandman
Gold Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 13,398
- Reaction score
- 3,994
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- In Michigan now.
- Detector(s) used
- Excal 1000, Excal II, Sovereign GT, CZ-20, Tiger Shark, Tejon, GTI 1500, Surfmaster Pulse, CZ6a, DFX, AT PRO, Fisher 1235, Surf PI Pro, 1280-X, many more because I enjoy learning them. New Garrett Ca
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Ditto on the heavy detector without that much increase in depth.
Top Member Reactions
-
2189 -
1593 -
1384 -
1233 -
1203 -
1057 -
997 -
783 -
778 -
610 -
569 -
539 -
516 -
498 -
483
