✅ SOLVED GB markings. Can anyone help identify please

postalgriff

Silver Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
1,091
Golden Thread
0
Location
Southern Michigan
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
2
Detector(s) used
Minelab SE
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • 4EA23B3E-E795-4867-AD28-20CE9B989F9F.webp
    4EA23B3E-E795-4867-AD28-20CE9B989F9F.webp
    244.3 KB · Views: 44
  • 7AA20EA7-7501-42C9-886D-FF78F0B8156A.webp
    7AA20EA7-7501-42C9-886D-FF78F0B8156A.webp
    258.9 KB · Views: 70
  • CF474EFC-032F-4A99-BAC5-7DB35B316B70.webp
    CF474EFC-032F-4A99-BAC5-7DB35B316B70.webp
    164.1 KB · Views: 68
Hmmm, at a glance, that would look like the royal crown. Perhaps your item was owned by the royal family of England.... Maybe revolutionary war era? Cool find. : )
 

Upvote 0
it's actually 'GR' for Georgius Rex, in other words, King George of England, probably George III.
 

Upvote 0
It's the broken off keyhole cover from a padlock:

VR Patent.webp

The above example was manufactured during the reign of Queen Victoria, hence VR for Victoria Regina. I've found one previously with "WR" from the reign of William IV, but yours could be George III or George IV. I'd lean towards George IV due to the term "patent" stamped into it, but either way definitely made in Britain.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
It's the broken off keyhole cover from a padlock:

View attachment 1889527

The above example was manufactured during the reign of Queen Victoria, hence VR for Victoria Regina. I've found one previously with "WR" from the reign of William IV, but yours could be George III or George IV. I'd lean towards George IV due to the term "patent" stamped into it, but either way definitely made in Britain.

wow! Nice ID my friend! Nailed it, thank you very much!
 

Upvote 0
This one is from the ‘antique-padlocks.com’ website. British-made, no manufacturer mark, but either George III (1760-1820) or George IV (1820-1830).

Padlock.webp

The cipher is not in the official design format but is an adaptation by the manufacturer for avoidance of copyright issues. As such it doesn’t convey any special use, nor that the company had been granted a Royal Warrant… it’s just a piece of patriotic symbolism which also makes it difficult to determine which George it is.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom