Giganticusopithicus Teeth,foot.

[Kirt Still]

I believe these are the teeth and the right foot of an GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS;
any feedback is welcome.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges - Grab it through Amazon!

[Tdog]

I can't argue with you. But, why post this on the North American Indian Artifact Forum? Even without a picture?

 

[Kirt Still]

I can't argue with you. But, why post this on the North American Indian Artifact Forum? Even without a picture?

I'm new and am trying to send pics.now

 

[Kirt Still]

I'm new and am trying to send pics.now

 

[Jeff H]

Yeah....GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS....let's go with that as the most likely identification of that grouping of objects.

 

[Kirt Still]

The larger is the right foot.

I can't argue with you. But, why post this on the North American Indian Artifact Forum? Even without a picture?

 

[Kirt Still]

Right foot bottom and top veiw.

 

[pepperj]

I believe these are the teeth and the right foot of an GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS;
any feedback is welcome.

So I need to ask you these questions:
Where did you find these specimens? (State/country)
Need better photos as the ones posted don't show anything really except some unidentified rocks.
(Size reference also would be appreciated)
Last question
What exactly is a GIGANTOCISOPTHICUS?
There was a GIGANTOPITHECUS

 

[Kirt Still]

Right foot bottom and top veiw.

So I need to ask you these questions:
Where did you find these specimens? (State/country)
Need better photos as the ones posted don't show anything really except some unidentified rocks.
(Size reference also would be appreciated)
Last question
What exactly is a GIGANTOCISOPTHICUS?
There was a GIGANTOPITHECUS

 

[Kirt Still]

So I need to ask you these questions:
Where did you find these specimens? (State/country)
Need better photos as the ones posted don't show anything really except some unidentified rocks.
(Size reference also would be appreciated)
Last question
What exactly is a GIGANTOCISOPTHICUS?
There was a GIGANTOPITHECUS

The GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS,A.K.A.BIGFOOT,SASQUACH,YETY,SKUNK APE,ABOMANABLE SNOW MAN.,
IT is also known as the missing link.,before US,HOMOERECTUS.
THESE RARE SPECEMINS WERE UNEARTHED ON MY PROPERTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA,
While digging out a bbq pit in my yard.
I will take better pics.and give my opinion on each fossil I photograph,and what it appears to be to me.

 

[pepperj]

The GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS,A.K.A.BIGFOOT,SASQUACH,YETY,SKUNK APE,ABOMANABLE SNOW MAN.,
IT is also known as the missing link.,before US,HOMOERECTUS.
THESE RARE SPECEMINS WERE UNEARTHED ON MY PROPERTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA,
While digging out a bbq pit in my yard.
I will take better pics.and give my opinion on each fossil I photograph,and what it appears to be to me.

"THESE RARE SPECEMINS WERE UNEARTHED ON MY PROPERTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA,"

Photos once again taken in low light, first one is an image of what?
Now "you" are claiming the above quote as the specimens are in fact "Rare".
What proof have you backing up this claim?

What I am reading is a person posting a bunch if specimens.
Claiming they're of a "Creature" (I'll just call it that)
Yet the OP is asking the readership on their opinions, when they've already determined that they have unearthed rare specimens of this said Creature.
Question begs to be asked: Why even bother in asking in the first place?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

The GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS,A.K.A.BIGFOOT,SASQUACH,YETY,SKUNK APE,ABOMANABLE SNOW MAN.,
IT is also known as the missing link.,before US,HOMOERECTUS.
THESE RARE SPECEMINS WERE UNEARTHED ON MY PROPERTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA,
While digging out a bbq pit in my yard.
I will take better pics.and give my opinion on each fossil I photograph,and what it appears to be to me.

Stull need better pictures with good natural light, when pictures are blurry when blown up they don't do much to help us.

 

[Kirt Still]

The GIGANTOCISOPETHICUS,A.K.A.BIGFOOT,SASQUACH,YETY,SKUNK APE,ABOMANABLE SNOW MAN.,
IT is also known as the missing link.,before US,HOMOERECTUS.
THESE RARE SPECEMINS WERE UNEARTHED ON MY PROPERTY IN SOUTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA,
While digging out a bbq pit in my yard.
I will take better pics.and give my opinion on each fossil I photograph,and what it appears to be to me.

Stull need better pictures with good natural light, when pictures are blurry when blown up they don't do much to help us.

 

[Kirt Still]

No.1 pic,is of the right foot,top view.pics. no.3456,are of the teeth,

View attachment 2060194

View attachment 2060195View attachment 2060288

View attachment 2060194

View attachment 2060195View attachment 2060288

 

[Kirt Still]

No.

View attachment 2060194

View attachment 2060195View attachment 2060288

Pic.1 and 2 are of teeth.
Pic.3 is of the side view of the right foot,the big toe is dropped lower than the remaining toes.

 

[UnderMiner]

As the foremost expert on Giganticusopithicus currently logged on to Treasurenet I can say without a shadow of a doubt that all these finds may actually be the remains of Giganticusopithicus. The best way to tell for sure is to re-bury them. True remains of Giganticusopithicus sprout into a bean stalk that rise into the clouds wherein the Giganticusopithicus and his wife live in a castle. Upon his table is said to sit a giant goose - a Giganticusopithicus Goose, that lays golden eggs.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Kirtland Still, please read and post by our rules, no insulting members .

 

[Kirt Still]

If you will read his comment about my subject matter,then is clearly him insulting my intelegents,
Do you concur?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

If you will read his comment about my subject matter,then is clearly him insulting my intelegents,
Do you concur?

He was joking with you, there is no excuse for insulting members.

Please read our rules, there is link to rules in my signature line.

Also there is nothing in pictures posted that reveals rocks are more than anything other than natural rocks. Maybe better pictures would reveal something, although I doubt it, all the pictures posted are out of focus.

 

[unclemac]

is the lack of focus by design?