Nothing like that for me, and I'm about as hard-core as they come

I'm betting that if you ever did hear of an "arrest" case, it's probably someone who couldn't take a warning, or someone night-sneaking an obvious historic off-limits monument, etc....
I've heard of a few persons getting a ticket (like a traffic ticket) for hunting on CA state historical park, or federal historic property. In one case, the fellow was on what he thought was outside the zone of the historic park area. He was un-aware that the state had purchased this adjoining parcel, only the previous year, for eventual plans to add more parking or whatever. The land had previously been city owned (and thus ok to hunt), and he was unaware that he was doing anything wrong. Try as he may, he couldn't talk the ranger out of the hundred dollar ticket.
Another fellow I know was hunting a historic federal military site near San Francisco. He got a little too brazen ..... and walked right on to an old parades ground. He got a ticket, but once again, a mere $150 or some silly nonsense. In that case, he probably should have known better (I mean, c'mon, a federal site ringed with historic buildings

)
In each of those cases, they involve
not only state and federal sites, but parks and historic interpretive type parks as well. This info (or fear, or whatever) would have no bearing on city or county level sites. And to be honest with ...... probably have no bearing on most state and federal sites as well (barring obvious historical monuments). For example: I hunt a WWII era base near me all the time, as have scores of others, in full view of MPs, passing people, etc... with no problems. So the difference isn't always whether it's state (and what your state rules are) or federal, but it's also a little common sense of what
type of site within those realms that they are.