TreasureTales said:
Michigan Badger, thank you for providing links to your test videos. I found them quite interesting. Were the quarters in the bag clad or silver? That might make a difference. Also, the soil conditions will affect the effective depth of any detector - IOW, air tests are only so good, for practical purposes. Still, I like that you took the time to create these videos and show just how important fine tuning can be. Thank you!
Glad you liked the video but I didn't do it. I found these on YouTube and thought they might be of interest here.
The young man doing these videos is doing a great job and I wrote and told him so.
Air tests are very important in one sense; they show the detectors extreme depth potential. That is, no detector can go deeper into the soil than it's air test. This is a scientific fact even if some manufactures claim otherwise.
Here's a quote from:
http://www.garysdetecting.co.uk/hoard_test.htm
"This myth is Busted
I asked Georgi Can machines that that don't air test well go deeper in the soil.
He said No absolute Crap!! this is scientifically impossible if a machine air tests badly it will detect badly in the soil despite what you read on metal detecting forums and some manufacturers literature.
However some machines that air test better can loose a higher percentage of depth in the soil around 30% depending on what type of search coil is used.
If you suspect these results are wrong, please go out there and do the buried coins test for yourself, I think you will be amazed!!!!.
As for the sixpence at 10" test we will be posting the results soon, but be warned there not good."
Air tests are of value and give a general idea of depth. Under the best circumstances one can expect at least a 30% loss of air distance as compared to ground depth.
SEE the Excalibur air test also listed under this heading.
Badger