Indian stone axe head? Please help!!! Images

Mikeditty1985

Tenderfoot
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Golden Thread
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • 1498106745198204723480.webp
    1498106745198204723480.webp
    386 KB · Views: 201
  • 1498106783333845785036.webp
    1498106783333845785036.webp
    392.4 KB · Views: 264
  • 14981068170711330010222.webp
    14981068170711330010222.webp
    428.6 KB · Views: 183
  • 1498106865451847576414.webp
    1498106865451847576414.webp
    451.4 KB · Views: 164
  • 14981098045891763438228.webp
    14981098045891763438228.webp
    282 KB · Views: 144
  • 1498109889677479186558.webp
    1498109889677479186558.webp
    1 MB · Views: 136
  • 1498109919843498217896.webp
    1498109919843498217896.webp
    347.5 KB · Views: 132
  • 14981099560501665435181.webp
    14981099560501665435181.webp
    354.6 KB · Views: 137
  • 1498109988460609084328.webp
    1498109988460609084328.webp
    487.4 KB · Views: 137
  • 1498110042883683300568.webp
    1498110042883683300568.webp
    1.1 MB · Views: 130
  • 1498110087233973077074.webp
    1498110087233973077074.webp
    375.9 KB · Views: 130
Last edited:
Just looks like a rock to me.
 

Upvote 0
I posted some new pics with better lighting, it looks like it was hand made to me up close
 

Upvote 0
Two questions,

One: Was it polished before or after finding?

Two: Was it found in association with other artifacts?

If it was found as is with that polished look, then I would say no. Reason behind that determination is that, it is obviously a break, and the break shouldn't be polished. If it wasn't found in conjunction with other artifacts, then it's really going to be hard to prove.

4th picture there is a bulb of depression, so either nature or man took a chunk outta that, so that is to be considered as well.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
All I am seeing is a natural rock.
 

Upvote 0
Upvote 0
IMO -A rock
to bad the stone was worked on, polished -
Never ever polish a stone you think is a relic
Bradyaaaaaa
 

Upvote 0
Natural by nature but resembles the shape.
 

Upvote 0
IKR, if you find it and state "it's a celt!" the phd is gonna say you are crazy, but if they find an aluminum can and say it's treasure...well it must be treasure. I would take any number of folks here to assist in an excavation that I would two or three one track profs. No offense to any members of academia but, sometimes your own deductions and scientific reasoning have already been done by what you call a "looter or treasure hunter". In my experience, people out looking for history, have more respect for history than those in higher education.
 

Upvote 0
Appears to be natural.
 

Upvote 0
I found one a few years before I started metal detecting. It is somewhere in my house right now, but I viewed it last year. It is very distinctive, with deep hand done grooves where the handle would go, and the whole head is very symmetrical. I see some parts on yours (the "blade"), that looks like they may have been worked, but they more likely are just natural.
 

Upvote 0
My parents were Indian artifact hunters. That doesn't look like any axe they found. My parents said Indian axes were used for crushing, not cutting.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom