What's new

Is Garrett Done in the Commercial Market?

TruthbeTold

Sr. Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2023
Messages
448
Reaction score
482
Golden Thread
0
The Vortex failed to even come close in performance to competitor's SMF offerings that had been in the market for years as well as being riddled with bugs.

With Minelab and Nokta releasing new and even more capable detectors, will Garrett drop out of the commercial market?
 
The Vortex failed to even come close in performance to competitor's SMF offerings that had been in the market for years as well as being riddled with bugs.

With Minelab and Nokta releasing new and even more capable detectors, will Garrett drop out of the commercial market?
Lets hope not. competition brings price stabilization and technical advances. More developers = better products.
Tehnical innovation is moving at light speed and so any manufacturer not totally dedicated to the race will fall behind and then disappear. Ask Whites....
 
Don't you get three strikes before you're out?
 
The Vortex failed to even come close in performance to competitor's SMF offerings that had been in the market for years as well as being riddled with bugs.

With Minelab and Nokta releasing new and even more capable detectors, will Garrett drop out of the commercial market?
By whose measure? This statement does not seem to jive with my personal experience or those who post UT videos using the Vortex to find all manner of treasure. On top of that, Garrett is made here in Texas and when I thought I had an issue and dropped by their business. the personnel could not have been any nicer or more helpful.
 
By whose measure? This statement does not seem to jive with my personal experience or those who post UT videos using the Vortex to find all manner of treasure. On top of that, Garrett is made here in Texas and when I thought I had an issue and dropped by their business. the personnel could not have been any nicer or more helpful.
I think it can be measured in many different ways, but most point towards a once 'market leader' resting on it's laurels and dishing out outdated products into a fast moving and developing market. The made in America angle is probably one of the only plus points at the moment.. Maybe they will hit back with a product that rivals ,or betters those available on the market, in the right price range for enthusiasts , who are not easily fooled.. Otherwise they might end up as a real live relic , a place in history.
 
I think it can be measured in many different ways, but most point towards a once 'market leader' resting on it's laurels and dishing out outdated products into a fast moving and developing market. The made in America angle is probably one of the only plus points at the moment.. Maybe they will hit back with a product that rivals ,or betters those available on the market, in the right price range for enthusiasts , who are not easily fooled.. Otherwise they might end up as a real live relic , a place in history.
I agree to an extent, Garrett detectors aren't all that sexy, have all the new fangled features, but were one of the first companies to come out with a reasonably detector that could go in the water to a depth of 10 feet. Nokta and Minelab are not American companies, which has always worried me when it came to service work. But I agree that their newest release has had it's share of problems, which is surprising to me because Garrett has never been a company to release a new detector without fully vetting it first like the Vortex. I'm sure heads have rolled over that debacle.
 
I have a soft spot for Garrett detectors, my first detector was a used Garrett, and have bought two more over the years since. Having said that, it is sad for me to say that they have not seemed to compete well in this current market. They tried to, as in the AT Pro, of which I bought, but then made a like copy with the AT Max and then the AT Gold. Always a little behind the curve. AstralDruid pretty much summed it up, and mntnflyt4fun pointed out Whites metal detectors, at one time THE detector to buy. Again, sorry to say but there are other brands out there that you can get more bang for the buck. I will not be buying anymore new detectors at this point in my life, and it sounds like the Vortex did not do well? I do wish well for Garrett, in part because they are Texas made, but Whites were made in Oregon, and that was not enough to keep them alive.
 
I have both an AT Max and a Vortex 9.
Have I found gold - yes!
Have I found silver - yes!
Have I found coins deep (so far at least 10 inches down) - yes!
Have I found relics - yes!
Have I found items on the beach - yes!
Have I found items in yards, parks, and playgrounds - yes!
Have I found items within a few inches of large metal poles - yes!
I like the light weight, I like the 5 audible tones, I like a scale that goes from 1 to 100, I like how long I can hunt on one charge, I like my wireless headphones.

Will I ever claim my detector is the best in the world? No, but what more can one want for a hobby? Just because one claims that someone else has found a particular brand wanting, does not make it so. I have not even seen a definition of the "best" detector that I think is universally agreed on.
 
I have both an AT Max and a Vortex 9.
Have I found gold - yes!
Have I found silver - yes!
Have I found coins deep (so far at least 10 inches down) - yes!
Have I found relics - yes!
Have I found items on the beach - yes!
Have I found items in yards, parks, and playgrounds - yes!
Have I found items within a few inches of large metal poles - yes!
I like the light weight, I like the 5 audible tones, I like a scale that goes from 1 to 100, I like how long I can hunt on one charge, I like my wireless headphones.

Will I ever claim my detector is the best in the world? No, but what more can one want for a hobby? Just because one claims that someone else has found a particular brand wanting, does not make it so. I have not even seen a definition of the "best" detector that I think is universally agreed on.
The real question is how many good finds has your vortex missed?
 
I have both an AT Max and a Vortex 9.
Have I found gold - yes!
Have I found silver - yes!
Have I found coins deep (so far at least 10 inches down) - yes!
Have I found relics - yes!
Have I found items on the beach - yes!
Have I found items in yards, parks, and playgrounds - yes!
Have I found items within a few inches of large metal poles - yes!
I like the light weight, I like the 5 audible tones, I like a scale that goes from 1 to 100, I like how long I can hunt on one charge, I like my wireless headphones.

Will I ever claim my detector is the best in the world? No, but what more can one want for a hobby? Just because one claims that someone else has found a particular brand wanting, does not make it so. I have not even seen a definition of the "best" detector that I think is universally agreed on.
No doubt you have found stuff, nobody said that Garrett detectors don't work and can't find targets,, of course they find targets,, the failure to modernise fast enough is the point.. They are slipping,, maybe to return with a bang (hopefully), or maybe go out with a whimper..? They need something great, and they need it fast...
 
No doubt you have found stuff, nobody said that Garrett detectors don't work and can't find targets,, of course they find targets,, the failure to modernise fast enough is the point.. They are slipping,, maybe to return with a bang (hopefully), or maybe go out with a whimper..? They need something great, and they need it fast...
Maybe a small hatch in a secret compartment that opens and drops a gold ring every 2 hours of use from a stack of rings covertly hidden inside the tube above the coil.

If Garrett invested a few million dollars in gold simply plopping out from the bottom of their detectors without the customers knowing its true source, people will assume Garrett detectors simply find gold rings better than other detectors, their sales increase, and Garrett can then buy more gold to put in its machines and cycle repeats until the competition goes out of business, Garrett reins supreme with a full market monopoly. Just kidding of course. But this idea is based on a real treasure hunting scam pulled in the 19th century.

Called "Gold Accumulators", they were metal screen devices put into the ocean (which was purported by the inventors to contain alot of free floating gold) and a diver from the company would simply sprinkle gold into them when nobody was looking, this prompted people to buy more of the devices, until one day the manufacturer had sold so many they were rich and just fled the country and the "Gold Accumulators" suddenly stopped working. True story apparently.
 
The real question is how many good finds has your vortex missed?
All detectors MISS stuff, which is why you can go back to sites you thought were hunted out and still find stuff. If your coil ain't over it, it ain't going to get dug.
 
Really do hope that they have something in their development pipeline... As discussed in many threads,,the feeling is we are all ready for some sort of revolution in the detecting game... Might as well be Garrett !!
 
The real question is how many good finds has your vortex missed?
Watched a pair of detectorists with non-Garrett detectors wag their detectors through a playground a while back and then followed them through the playground and found a 14K gold ring.

So, I think the real questions are:
What proof do you have that Garrett detectors will miss specific types of targets that all other detectors on the market will find? Why are you "picking" on Garrett and assuming that all other detectors on the market best them?
 
Not picking on Garrett. I used to own Garrett detectors. Since then they fell far behind other manufacturers in technology.

Just a few examples of the Vortex's issues:

Vortex beer can vs. silver dollar

Vortex VDI Errors

Vortex Firmware Version 9.08 Issues

Garrett owes customers an apology for the vortex

GARRETT VORTEX VX5,VX9 DISASTER! MUST SEE ! NEEDS AN UPDATE ASAP!

GARRETT VORTEX VERSION 9.11 ....Please build a new detector Garrett!

Vortex vs. competitor's lower cost detector

Many more examples of the Vortex's issues are available on the internet...
 
Not picking on Garrett. I used to own Garrett detectors. Since then they fell far behind other manufacturers in technology.

Just a few examples of the Vortex's issues:

Vortex beer can vs. silver dollar

Vortex VDI Errors

Vortex Firmware Version 9.08 Issues

Garrett owes customers an apology for the vortex

GARRETT VORTEX VX5,VX9 DISASTER! MUST SEE ! NEEDS AN UPDATE ASAP!

GARRETT VORTEX VERSION 9.11 ....Please build a new detector Garrett!

Vortex vs. competitor's lower cost detector

Many more examples of the Vortex's issues are available on the internet...
None of your posted responses truly addresses the question I posted.

I regularly watch UT videos of detectorists that use Deus 2, Equinox, Minelab, Vortex and others.
Everyone of them finds treasure.
Everyone of them sometimes gets a signal they think is very promising and then digs junk.
Everyone of them sometimes gets an iffy signal and digs it to be rewarded with treasure.
Everyone of them digs a large amount of junk.

I think you and I will never be in agreement. I think there are 2 significant metal detecting camps - those who make the most of whatever machine they have and those who think the metal detector is supposed to be perfect and do all the work for them. In other words I believe the issue here is discrimination accuracy and how much to rely on that. The successful UT posters do not rely on the discrimination accuracy - they dig all and then rescan the area. Different people will have different results with any given machine. For instance one of the detectors used on the UT videos drives me crazy with the tones used.

You may not think you are picking on Garrett, but you have crossed a line when you only post negative comments about one brand and particularly when you post opinions not based on personal experience but rather on parroting what you think others have discovered and particularly when you focus on the negative and never acknowledge a positive. You come across as wanting to destroy Garrett.

I wish you the best of luck.
 
None of your posted responses truly addresses the question I posted.

I regularly watch UT videos of detectorists that use Deus 2, Equinox, Minelab, Vortex and others.
Everyone of them finds treasure.
Everyone of them sometimes gets a signal they think is very promising and then digs junk.
Everyone of them sometimes gets an iffy signal and digs it to be rewarded with treasure.
Everyone of them digs a large amount of junk.

I think you and I will never be in agreement. I think there are 2 significant metal detecting camps - those who make the most of whatever machine they have and those who think the metal detector is supposed to be perfect and do all the work for them. In other words I believe the issue here is discrimination accuracy and how much to rely on that. The successful UT posters do not rely on the discrimination accuracy - they dig all and then rescan the area. Different people will have different results with any given machine. For instance one of the detectors used on the UT videos drives me crazy with the tones used.

You may not think you are picking on Garrett, but you have crossed a line when you only post negative comments about one brand and particularly when you post opinions not based on personal experience but rather on parroting what you think others have discovered and particularly when you focus on the negative and never acknowledge a positive. You come across as wanting to destroy Garrett.

I wish you the best of luck.
If you had watched all of the videos you would have seen examples of the vortex missing good targets next to trash.

One of the advantages of SMF detectors is the ability to discriminate good targets from trash. This is something Minelab, Nokta, and XP have been successfully doing for years.

As Garrett is a newcomer to the SMF market, they are lagging far behind in engineeeing expertise in designing SMF detectors. The apex was their first venture and was a weak offering.

Time will tell if Garrett invests more in engineering to be able to compete in the SMF arena or silently leaves it with their current offerings.
 
I agree to an extent, Garrett detectors aren't all that sexy, have all the new fangled features, but were one of the first companies to come out with a reasonably detector that could go in the water to a depth of 10 feet. Nokta and Minelab are not American companies, which has always worried me when it came to service work. But I agree that their newest release has had it's share of problems, which is surprising to me because Garrett has never been a company to release a new detector without fully vetting it first like the Vortex. I'm sure heads have rolled over that debacle.
In the past I would send in a detector to Garrett for repair. Even older units were repaired and returned in working condition. Recently I sent in an older AT4 that was not working. Was in very good condition. Now being an electrical engineer and master technician I could easily recognize a unit that had been flooded. This one showed no such damage. However, Garrett returned it to me and said not repairable, Has been flooded. They told me they would give me a generous discount on anything new they have. I can understand a unit is not repairable if it uses application specific integrated circuits ASIC's. but this unit used no such items and was full of standard IC's widely available. I have it working, Since they do not supply schematics or any info on any of their equipment it was not easy but I just followed the signal from input to output to find the area where the problem was. I did this knowing the IC's input/output pins and used an oscilloscope to follow the signal. It (for me) was not difficult...for them it would have been very easy. This gives you an idea. of their commitment. They have a good business in the commercial side of detecting for security. They do not need us anymore. On the other hand, I sent in an XP Deuce and had it back in 10 days, all working and fixed at a moderate repair cost.... There you have it...
 
Garrett marches to the beat of their own drum! They aren’t going anywhere. They still have a fan base. Metal detectors are for hobbyists. They probably focus on commercial metal detectors for Court houses, airports, Jails, Stadiums, anywhere people need to be checked for weapons, bombs , etc. The same goes for Fisher ( first texas) they have other entities for electronic devices. notably Nite vision optics, probably with government contracts. Business is about making money for shareholders ! Hobby MDs will always come after that . my 2cents .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom