🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Need help with some colonial period relic.

[Aureus]

Hey everyone. Was hoping to get some help with the ID of these unknown to me items found at a colonial period site. Coins mostly dated between 1740-1800, most relics seemed to suggest the site was abandoned before 1820

Appears to be some kind of a hook (possibly used in clothing?) The first type seems to be decorated with an image of two birds and heart. I'm not certain of the metal composition but it certainly isn't lead. Could be some type of pewter, silver or nickel alloy.


Thanks

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[ARC]

Possible pulls... ?

 

[Aureus]

Possible pulls... ?



I doubt it. They seem too fragile for it. Plus, it wouldn't explain the holes that are visible in the back. I was thinking maybe some type of corset hooks...not sure

 

[ARC]

Well not for furniture... i should have been more specific... more like a jewelry box or tea caddy type dealio.

 

[Aureus]

Well not for furniture... i should have been more specific... more like a jewelry box or tea caddy type dealio.

Could be the case. I'm curious about those holes that were added on, I think they would explain a lot on its use

 

[ARC]

Could be the case. I'm curious about those holes that were added on, I think they would explain a lot on its use

Personally... I think they are purely aesthetic /decorative.

 

[Aureus]

Personally... I think they are purely aesthetic /decorative.

I think they were made on purpose. They don't seem to be improving the looks of the item.

 

[TheCannonballGuy]

Perhaps the multiple tiny holes in the PLAIN-backed fancy brass hook were put in it to allow it to be sewed onto cloth or leather. Perhaps it thus became half of a cloak-clasp... or something similar.

There's no need to put any labor into creating designs or emblems on the back when that side will be always-&-completely "hidden from view."

 

[Aureus]

Perhaps the multiple tiny holes in the PLAIN-backed fancy brass hook were put in it to allow it to be sewed onto cloth or leather. Perhaps it thus became half of a cloak-clasp... or something similar.

There's no need to put any labor into creating designs or emblems on the back when that side will be always-&-completely "hidden from view."

Yes, that's what I think as well. Just not sure what it was attached to.

 

[Dakota Sioux]

Could be part of the belt hangers for a sword

 

[TheCannonballGuy]

Dakota Sioux wrote:
> Could be part of the belt hangers for a sword.

That is a very good guess. It is definitely on the right track toward the object's correct ID. But Aureus's find is much too small and "lightweight construction" to carry the weight of a sword in its scabbard. Compare the diameter and "thin-ness" of the loop on Aureus's find to the thick sturdy loop on the sword scabbard-strap hanger in the photo you posted.

 

[Aureus]

Just noticed something I haven't before. The holes on both items seem to align.

 

[ARC]

Just noticed something I haven't before. The holes on both items seem to align. They appear to be hand made after the items were cast, so I'm wondering if there was some type of small metal rods connecting the objects through those holes.



View attachment 2065008 View attachment 2065009

IMO... They were cast in a mold... it is simply part of the design... now like CBG suggested... they may have had a use for being sewn into a garment.

 

[CRUSADER]

They look at least 18th C or a bit earlier.
If found in the UK I would have thought Clothes fasteners, but ours stopped in the late 16th C, so not sure what to think about yours.

 

[villagenut]

Could those holes have been there to support small colored glass dots or beads

 

[CRUSADER]

Could those holes have been there to support small colored glass dots or beads

Nope, its part of the openwork design & some were used to sew the object on the clothes.

 

[Aureus]

They look at least 18th C or a bit earlier.
If found in the UK I would have thought Clothes fasteners, but ours stopped in the late 16th C, so not sure what to think about yours.

That's what was my dilemma as well. I'm used to find similar items in Europe and was a bit confused after finding these in Canada. Of course there's no way for them to be as old as the ones found in UK and France but their look and construction made me think of the relics I've seen in Europe. Considering the area I have found them at, they should be no older than mid 18th century. Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be a common relic here. Most certainly, I have never found anything similar in Canada and I've found a lot of stuff in the last 7 years.