Bsit, your point "could" arguably be called a Hardaway blade, if found in that context. But if simply a surface find on a multi-component site, there's no telling what it is (other than maybe a preform).
Coe named the Hardaway type and according to him were three different types at the Hardaway site. They were found at the deepest lvls (lvl 4), palmer was found at lvl 3 and kirk at Lvl2. The three types (as described by him) are the Hardaway Blade, Hardaway Dalton and Hardaway side-notch. Greenbrier, Nansemond and a few other "Dalton" variants are most likely morphed from the Hardaway and can be almost indistinguishable at times, area found should be a prime consideration when typing them. Unless found in direct context with Hardaway,it would be tough to distinguish Hardaway Blades from other early archaic blades or preforms. Being a preform, does it deserve to be called a separate type? Not in my opinion.
The Dalton-Hardaway, even though recognized at the Hardway site, is also erroneous. The Dalton culture doesn't seem to have a presence in that area; the same can be said for many other "Dalton" points in other areasl, I recently wrote an article about just that. Alamance points are the same as the "Hardaway-Dalton" and that name should be taken into consideration when examining points from that region.