Nice find.

JUDDZILLA

Jr. Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Golden Thread
0
Location
Allentown, Pa.
Primary Interest:
Other

Attachments

  • 184.webp
    184.webp
    14.2 KB · Views: 1,076
  • 185.webp
    185.webp
    9.6 KB · Views: 1,076
  • 183.webp
    183.webp
    10.8 KB · Views: 1,136
  • 186.webp
    186.webp
    9.7 KB · Views: 1,152
JUDDZILLA said:
Black duck with white head looking backwards. Last pic is backside of item
Pics. 2 and 4 is standing on its own(front then back) it stands very well.
 

Judd - while I applaud your efforts and "outside the box" thinking when looking at rocks to determine if they are artifacts or not, you're missing the main ingredient. None (or at least none of the ones I've seen you post yet) have ANY indications that they've been worked by any human hand.
 

I do the same thing. I collect interesting looking rocks...hand made or not. Nature is fascinating. :thumbsup:

Al
 

The texture of the top(white) is Very much different than the bottom. The back texture (reverse side) is completely different from the front , top or bottom. The Perfect placement of the groove separating top from bottom,black from white doesn't appear to be natural either. It stands on its own very well too. And if you noticed I haven't (in this reply nor the post) used the term "Artifact", "Effigy" or relic. I wanted to see what kind of responses I would receive.
 

Attachments

  • 186.webp
    186.webp
    11.4 KB · Views: 461
LOL. I do the same thing when I look at clouds. I see the duck.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom