I don't see anything about it which says 'meteorite' but it doesn't look like slag either. More likely a terrestrial rock.
It's not correct that 'most meteorites are almost all iron'. Nickel-iron meteorites are almost all iron-nickel in composition and account for about 90% of the mass of known falls (because they have a historical tendency to be large as well as dense and resistant) but they only represent about 6% of known falls numerically. Chondrites are far more common at around 85% of all falls and those typically have a metal content between 2-20%, but down to almost zero depending on type. Achondrites represent around 8% of all falls and are usually very low in metal too. If present, iron always occurs together with nickel (almost always as the Fe-Ni alloys taenite and kamacite), but a nickel test obviously only helps if the meteorite also happens to contain iron.
I'm not sure what is meant by 'no spherulites'. If you mean 'no chondrules' then not all meteorites contain them. Chondrites obviously do, but they can be tiny, sparse or melted and indistinct. Nickel-iron meteorites don't have chondrules, although they may have spherical inclusions such as graphite or olivine. Achondrites by definition don't have chondrules.
There's little that can be said from your picture except that it doesn't look like any kind of typical meteorite. Some exploration of its basic properties might help to establish what it is. You haven't said how big it is, how much it weighs, whether it's unusually dense, how strongly it's attracted to a magnet, what colour streak it has. No view of its interior. Also no mention of the context in which it was found nor an overview of the general geology/topography.