Sniffy
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2009
- Messages
- 2,043
- Reaction score
- 95
- Golden Thread
- 1
- Location
- Connecticut
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Prizm III Teknetics T2
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Upvote
0
naturegirl said:Never in my life, did I ever think about Ohio, much less wish I lived there! I'm new to this forum, but I think Ohio must take the prize for "most found Native American artifacts". Those are beautiful. Has that distinction been made? Which state has the most found evidence of life long ago?
ng
ohio said:So how did you have it carbon dated??
11KBP said:ohio said:So how did you have it carbon dated??
Good question ...I'm interested in hearing more.
Other questions would be who carbon dated it and how much did it cost?
11KBP
greg-rocks said:Isnt carbon dating done on the dirt that the artifact was found in?not the artifact itself.if you could carbon date the artifact then there wouldnt be all this conjecture on when the oldest peoples habitated north america.sniffy that is a nice frame of artifacts but disagree on the carbon dating of that artifact.thx for sharing the pics.
naturegirl said:Never in my life, did I ever think about Ohio, much less wish I lived there! I'm new to this forum, but I think Ohio must take the prize for "most found Native American artifacts". Those are beautiful. Has that distinction been made? Which state has the most found evidence of life long ago?
ng