Paleo-Archaic point and natural stone

CloudKicker0

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
118
Reaction score
164
Golden Thread
0
This is my first and only point I’ve ever found, and I guess you could say that it found me because at the time I wasn’t looking for it while I was walking down the beach (Eastern NC surface find). Now mostly wherever I go I’m scanning the ground for artifacts and anomalies.

I posted some pictures back in May 2020, but have since received some new information from a state archeologist whose name I’ll respectfully hold in anonymity.

“The projectile point looks similar to what we would call a Hardaway side-notched, though the side notching is not as pronounced as many examples and it has likely been heavily resharpened. The base looks like its been ground, which is a common feature on late Paleo-Indian and Early Archaic points in this area. This type of point likely dates to 10-11,000 years ago. The material is interesting and while it is likely still a variety of metavolcanic stone, which the majority of stone tools are made out of in NC, it is not a type I am very familiar with.”

I’ve “scoured” the internet for a point of like-material but have been unsuccessful. Does that make it an unclassified piece? Would someone please share pictures of a point with similar material?

I’m also sharing some pictures of a natural rock of somewhat similar material. If anyone can see any signs of flaking/grinding or shaping would you please help share with this novice?
 

Attachments

  • F93C3FA4-2EF6-4365-B362-B5E0BDAD3924.webp
    F93C3FA4-2EF6-4365-B362-B5E0BDAD3924.webp
    1.2 MB · Views: 122
  • 670C2B27-369C-4131-9DCC-C627217E5111.webp
    670C2B27-369C-4131-9DCC-C627217E5111.webp
    960.7 KB · Views: 97
  • DA43065C-3888-4056-93D6-95E4ABF92126.webp
    DA43065C-3888-4056-93D6-95E4ABF92126.webp
    1.5 MB · Views: 87
  • 4B547B5A-370E-4298-A637-BE59F41DC753.webp
    4B547B5A-370E-4298-A637-BE59F41DC753.webp
    1.2 MB · Views: 86
  • 08173019-1C96-4324-BA4F-A195D4E99C6E.webp
    08173019-1C96-4324-BA4F-A195D4E99C6E.webp
    1.1 MB · Views: 77
  • 6BBB25F4-4F53-4E52-B839-511BBBD3C182.webp
    6BBB25F4-4F53-4E52-B839-511BBBD3C182.webp
    375.9 KB · Views: 80
  • 3A26EE61-03B9-4956-A513-AA3FB7151609.webp
    3A26EE61-03B9-4956-A513-AA3FB7151609.webp
    350.4 KB · Views: 77
  • 946CD16D-5FA6-4C72-96CC-905D7AAD24EC.webp
    946CD16D-5FA6-4C72-96CC-905D7AAD24EC.webp
    339.9 KB · Views: 78
  • C624B10E-DE91-48F5-A634-9B346E8D48B2.webp
    C624B10E-DE91-48F5-A634-9B346E8D48B2.webp
    789.8 KB · Views: 104
  • 1E67448E-ABD8-4361-BD8C-F63DFAF2C8B2.webp
    1E67448E-ABD8-4361-BD8C-F63DFAF2C8B2.webp
    888.4 KB · Views: 78
  • 594DB68B-98CA-4BBD-B89E-74CCAB65A4EA.webp
    594DB68B-98CA-4BBD-B89E-74CCAB65A4EA.webp
    777.1 KB · Views: 81
  • 8B97A69D-F129-4304-950E-720826804044.webp
    8B97A69D-F129-4304-950E-720826804044.webp
    943.4 KB · Views: 105
  • 5A4FFD3C-2EBA-4C5D-AB53-FF7B65884044.webp
    5A4FFD3C-2EBA-4C5D-AB53-FF7B65884044.webp
    473 KB · Views: 91
  • 891F2EB1-FC31-483F-BEBF-2D75112FEACD.webp
    891F2EB1-FC31-483F-BEBF-2D75112FEACD.webp
    471.8 KB · Views: 76
  • 61FA87A1-D258-4BBC-82E5-159C649DC647.webp
    61FA87A1-D258-4BBC-82E5-159C649DC647.webp
    891.4 KB · Views: 75
  • 9CB1A6A7-D4DB-45C2-B970-EC960FCC211F.webp
    9CB1A6A7-D4DB-45C2-B970-EC960FCC211F.webp
    494.6 KB · Views: 72
  • 7426FFF3-4462-41BC-BA31-B9F18E14B4A8.webp
    7426FFF3-4462-41BC-BA31-B9F18E14B4A8.webp
    257.6 KB · Views: 67
  • E67CC4E0-D887-4BA9-8E8D-6348ED816633.webp
    E67CC4E0-D887-4BA9-8E8D-6348ED816633.webp
    855.8 KB · Views: 70
  • BB7934E2-C891-40A1-BDBC-3A26720C2641.webp
    BB7934E2-C891-40A1-BDBC-3A26720C2641.webp
    552 KB · Views: 95
Upvote 10
Congratulations on your first artifact!
 

This is my first and only point I’ve ever found, and I guess you could say that it found me because at the time I wasn’t looking for it while I was walking down the beach (Eastern NC surface find). Now mostly wherever I go I’m scanning the ground for artifacts and anomalies.

I posted some pictures back in May 2020, but have since received some new information from a state archeologist whose name I’ll respectfully hold in anonymity.

“The projectile point looks similar to what we would call a Hardaway side-notched, though the side notching is not as pronounced as many examples and it has likely been heavily resharpened. The base looks like its been ground, which is a common feature on late Paleo-Indian and Early Archaic points in this area. This type of point likely dates to 10-11,000 years ago. The material is interesting and while it is likely still a variety of metavolcanic stone, which the majority of stone tools are made out of in NC, it is not a type I am very familiar with.”

I’ve “scoured” the internet for a point of like-material but have been unsuccessful. Does that make it an unclassified piece? Would someone please share pictures of a point with similar material?

I’m also sharing some pictures of a natural rock of somewhat similar material. If anyone can see any signs of flaking/grinding or shaping would you please help share with this novice?
Once you’ve found one, it gets hard to look up when you’re in certain areas. Congrats!
 

I have a hard time seeing it as a variant of Hardaway Side Notch. This illustration of North Carolina points shows Hardaway Side Notch points in the bottom two rows. Note deep concave base, delicate but well defined side notches, and recurved ears so typical of these points.

I agree the material is likely a variety of rhyolite. I love rhyolite, and if that’s the material, it’s some nice looking stuff! Very nice point…

16A0F808-F277-4705-BE53-8C6681CE0708.webp
 

FWIW, type one, the earliest type of Hardaway points (top rows of that excellent assemblage) are more waisted than notched. Bottom rows are type threes (final form -- essentially eastern San Patrice points). (Cache River points from Arkansas can be pretty similar). FWIW
 

This is my first and only point I’ve ever found, and I guess you could say that it found me because at the time I wasn’t looking for it while I was walking down the beach (Eastern NC surface find). Now mostly wherever I go I’m scanning the ground for artifacts and anomalies.

I posted some pictures back in May 2020, but have since received some new information from a state archeologist whose name I’ll respectfully hold in anonymity.

“The projectile point looks similar to what we would call a Hardaway side-notched, though the side notching is not as pronounced as many examples and it has likely been heavily resharpened. The base looks like its been ground, which is a common feature on late Paleo-Indian and Early Archaic points in this area. This type of point likely dates to 10-11,000 years ago. The material is interesting and while it is likely still a variety of metavolcanic stone, which the majority of stone tools are made out of in NC, it is not a type I am very familiar with.”

I’ve “scoured” the internet for a point of like-material but have been unsuccessful. Does that make it an unclassified piece? Would someone please share pictures of a point with similar material?

I’m also sharing some pictures of a natural rock of somewhat similar material. If anyone can see any signs of flaking/grinding or shaping would you please help share with this novice?
So, I still haven’t seen any comparable pictures of this material. Does anyone out there think there’s at least a 1% chance that this is meteorite (chondrite)?
 

Attachments

  • F424A999-4AD7-4C4C-9EF6-2EB96006F681.webp
    F424A999-4AD7-4C4C-9EF6-2EB96006F681.webp
    99.6 KB · Views: 36
It's not. The material on your artifact is rhyolite. Anything meteorite is most likely un knappable by ancient techniques.
 

It's not. The material on your artifact is rhyolite. Anything meteorite is most likely un knappable by ancient techniques.
Alright. I hear you. Fair enough. So show me a comparable worked rhyolite stone material and I’ll believe you.
 

FWIW, type one, the earliest type of Hardaway points (top rows of that excellent assemblage) are more waisted than notched. Bottom rows are type threes (final form -- essentially eastern San Patrice points). (Cache River points from Arkansas can be pretty similar). FWIW
I don’t have the photo caption or page in front of me at the moment. But it came from a North Carolina archaeological laboratory website. The top row was described as Hardaway Blades, the 2nd row as Hardaway-Dalton points, and the last two rows as Hardaway Side Notch points.

I don’t personally believe the point in this thread is related to Hardaway points…..
 

This is my first and only point I’ve ever found, and I guess you could say that it found me because at the time I wasn’t looking for it while I was walking down the beach (Eastern NC surface find). Now mostly wherever I go I’m scanning the ground for artifacts and anomalies.

I posted some pictures back in May 2020, but have since received some new information from a state archeologist whose name I’ll respectfully hold in anonymity.

“The projectile point looks similar to what we would call a Hardaway side-notched, though the side notching is not as pronounced as many examples and it has likely been heavily resharpened. The base looks like its been ground, which is a common feature on late Paleo-Indian and Early Archaic points in this area. This type of point likely dates to 10-11,000 years ago. The material is interesting and while it is likely still a variety of metavolcanic stone, which the majority of stone tools are made out of in NC, it is not a type I am very familiar with.”

I’ve “scoured” the internet for a point of like-material but have been unsuccessful. Does that make it an unclassified piece? Would someone please share pictures of a point with similar material?

I’m also sharing some pictures of a natural rock of somewhat similar material. If anyone can see any signs of flaking/grinding or shaping would you please help share with this novice?

There are no volcanoes in or around my area in coastal NC. As I understand it, this type of rock was ejected from a volcano! Adds to the mystery. Where did the point travel from? Far far away I suppose.
 

FWIW, I was referencing Coe's (1956 ?) breakdown of them. Or at least I think I was. (Past age 70 memory can becan adventure).
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom