Hmmmm . . . This appears to be a horse of the Subfamily EQUINAE.11KBP said:What animal species is this?
Thank you.
Harry Pristis said:Hmmmm . . . This appears to be a horse of the Subfamily EQUINAE.11KBP said:What animal species is this?
Thank you.
If you want to know the species or trivial name of this horse, that may be something of a challenge. For example, there are many named species within the genus Equus (Tribe EQUINI), some valid, some no longer valid. It is a taxonomist's playground. Six Pliocene and Pleistocene species of Equus are acknowledged in Hulbert's THE FOSSIL VERTEBRATES OF FLORIDA. And there are other tribes.
A museum may be useful of a precise identification.
Go with the best info you have. If you have no other data, Late Pleistocene is a reasonable working assumption.Thanks Harry.
The skull was found in the same region as other late Pleistocene fauna have been found so I was assuming it could be from that time period. So, is this a valid assumption?
11KBP
Harry Pristis said:Go with the best info you have. If you have no other data, Late Pleistocene is a reasonable working assumption.Thanks Harry.
The skull was found in the same region as other late Pleistocene fauna have been found so I was assuming it could be from that time period. So, is this a valid assumption?
11KBP