The True History of John Swift... Written by one who Knows .... 1894.

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
⛭ Moderator
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
89,975
Reaction score
65,567
Golden Thread
2
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The Hazel Green herald. (Hazel Green, Wolfe County, Ky.), 04 Oct. 1894.

00aaa.webp
00bbb.webp
00ccc.webp
00ddd.webp
00eee.webp
00fff.webp
00ggg.webp
00hhh.webp
00iii.webp
00jjj.webp
00kkk.webp
00lll.webp
00mmm.webp
00nnn.webp
00ooo.webp
00ppp.webp

https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/...ext=&andtext=&dateFilterType=yearRange&page=1


Conclusion Below
 

Last edited:
great post thank you never seen this before
 

Very interesting read!! Seems I've seen it or at least part of it before. Thanks for posting it. On pages 5,6,7 describing the area and the way water coarse run. Very descriptive.
 

Last edited:

One of about 30 links I have saved, The Library of Congress is a great site. Notice that :thumbsup:Mrs. Timmins is the author of this two part article. Thanks for posting Jeff, I usually just put a link to it.
 

Last edited:
the description on the curiosity article

resembles ordinary glass lamp up to the point of the burner

is what has me thinking it is.

But from a Different Angle

000lau.webp000mil.webp

however the Lack of a view of the Flat Rock on top,
Keeps me from being sure.

The Men Could be standing on the Flat Rock
& the Point may be directly in front of Them.

Wild Guess

000lau222.webp000mil111.webp
 

Last edited:
Its possible, the modern photo doesn't show much for scale. Height and scale with the men standing looks to be 20ft or more. Do the drains match the article's description of twin branches? Is it near Orbourne Gap, VA? I don't see much of an oil lamp in the angle of the modern picture either with a narrow 6ft diameter base.
 

Last edited:
although it would be surprising to me, even the 4 trees surrounding it,
appear to be in both photos.

3 to the right, 1 to the Left
 

You know,... it looks like another Swift description of a chestnut burr rock, even more than a balanced rock.
 

You know,... it looks like another Swift description of a chestnut burr rock, even more than a balanced rock.

The original grainy picture does seem to have the right texture to be considered a chestnut burr rock.
 

In consideration of the description of the route traveled.. The number of days traveled would match to about 18 miles a day traveled by horseback. This sounds about right traveling along trails by water ways .
 

You know,... it looks like another Swift description of a chestnut burr rock, even more than a balanced rock.

...the lean at the top of the rock in the old picture makes me think of a haystack also.
 

In consideration of the description of the route traveled.. The number of days traveled would match to about 18 miles a day traveled by horseback. This sounds about right traveling along trails by water ways .
I have thought of this often, there would be a difference in travel time considering two things other than weather and Indian trouble. First the load on the pack animals and second, the number of hours of daylight available during the time of year traveled. Their return trip in most journals I have read take a week or more time getting back than getting to the mines. Assuming US23 follows an old trace like US460, the Southwest party could have headed right toward Paintsville and Prestonsburg and NOT along the 'great ridge'. If the other party took a heading of 'due West' they would end up near Frenchburg in direction. It would be almost NNEast to get up towards Grayson Lake/ Carter caves, unless they followed the creeks. Now did they stick to the traces or follow the creek and stream beds like the journals say? I think we all can agree who have been in rugged terrian, its almost impossible to move at a constant heading (direction). I would assume they would use landmarks for dead reckoning OR marked boulders/trees where streams came together to know where to turn. Navigation 'off trail' or away from traces would be difficult at best in the green growing months especially if using landmarks for waypoints. Following this reasoning, I think they used the traces as much as physically possible until they came to a landmark (peculiar rock, marked tree, stream crossing that looked like a turkey track,...ect) then made off into the stream beds as to leave no trace for Indians to follow. The traces were the highways of the era, definitely faster than creek beds but not safer. Also the traces would provide food/hunting for the party. Nailing down the areas mined by Swift we must first find the major traces in KY from Louisa (first forks of Sandy) South-West-North of the town. More than likely they mined areas within a couple days travel from a trace to stay undetected. An exception to this is the journals that say Mundy brought Swift to mines he had worked with the Indians. This could mean a trace was VERY close to that mine location.

Just my thoughts and ponderings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Indian_Warpath

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester,_Virginia
 

Last edited:
The mines that was found a Grayson is a considerable distance south of the town of Grayson. Curtis or some of the guys in the know can correct me if I'm wrong about this. 460 and 23 runs together from Paintsville to near the Ky. border with Va. . As most of the old buffalo trails ran along the major routes of years gone by, Not so much with all the road improvements over the last number of years. Most of them ran close to water way because animals have to have water too .Grassy river bottoms provided good grazing and water was close by.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom