"There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

[EE THr]

Re: "There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

Oh for crying out loud, EE! I didn't want to use the term "skeptic" because it gets your panties in a wad. The term "anti-LRL'er was not meant to be derogatory.

What encompassing term am I to use that includes all who oppose LRL's without using word "skeptic"?

Your post is just more proof that you are here just to instigate and agitate, not educate.

I have told you, many, many times now, that I began in this Section by asking a few rational, common sense questions. That's not "to instigate and agitate." I have continued asking simple questions, but when I get nonsensical answers with nothing to back them up, and no references or links to verify them, I will point that out.

I have posted real, verifiable, facts---some of which were posted earlier by others---and highlighted certain points within them which pertain to the particular thread they appear in. I have posted verifiable links to sources of information which pertains to my comments. That can be construed as what you call "educational," while fish stories from LRL promoters cannot. And neither can your one-sided insults and snide remarks, which, other than your one story about your use of one LRL and how it didn't really work, is all you have ever posted.

You try to use your one story about one LRL to base your claim that you are unbiased, while the vast majority of your posts merely attack those who post facts about these fraudulent devices.

You have read the definition of "skeptic," and I assume that you can see that it is an intentional misrepresentation, with the intent to water-down the viewpoints of those who post verifiable facts which prove the LRL scam.

Are you trying to claim that you haven't read all those posts which state that debunkers are not "skeptics"? Again you have been caught, trying to falsely claim innocence by ignorance.



P.S. When will you start posting on-topic, about LRL devices, rather than attacking people?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[signal_line]

Re: "There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

Once again, the skeptics could not find any info on the internet to copy and parrot. 200 distinct magnetic effects and nobody named a single one? I thought all the skeptics were know-it-alls. Well, you learn something new every day. If you don't know it, change the subject, attack the LRL user.

 

[EddieR]

Re: "There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

Oh for crying out loud, EE! I didn't want to use the term "skeptic" because it gets your panties in a wad. The term "anti-LRL'er was not meant to be derogatory.

What encompassing term am I to use that includes all who oppose LRL's without using word "skeptic"?

Your post is just more proof that you are here just to instigate and agitate, not educate.

I have told you, many, many times now, that I began in this Section by asking a few rational, common sense questions. That's not "to instigate and agitate." I have continued asking simple questions, but when I get nonsensical answers with nothing to back them up, and no references or links to verify them, I will point that out.

I have posted real, verifiable, facts---some of which were posted earlier by others---and highlighted certain points within them which pertain to the particular thread they appear in. I have posted verifiable links to sources of information which pertains to my comments. That can be construed as what you call "educational," while fish stories from LRL promoters cannot. And neither can your one-sided insults and snide remarks, which, other than your one story about your use of one LRL and how it didn't really work, is all you have ever posted.

You try to use your one story about one LRL to base your claim that you are unbiased, while the vast majority of your posts merely attack those who post facts about these fraudulent devices.

You have read the definition of "skeptic," and I assume that you can see that it is an intentional misrepresentation, with the intent to water-down the viewpoints of those who post verifiable facts which prove the LRL scam.

Are you trying to claim that you haven't read all those posts which state that debunkers are not "skeptics"? Again you have been caught, trying to falsely claim innocence by ignorance.



P.S. When will you start posting on-topic, about LRL devices, rather than attacking people?

I asked you a question. Answer it.

P.S. When are you going to post something about magnetic effects?..................... that is the topic of this thread

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: "There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

~E~

I have told you, many, many times now, that I began in this Section by asking a few rational, common sense questions. That's not "to instigate and agitate." I have continued asking simple questions, but when I get nonsensical answers with nothing to back them up, and no references or links to verify them, I will point that out.

Yes you have told us that is the bases of your opinions..Have you thought that the things you claim are nonsensical answers are the truth?

I have posted real, verifiable, facts---some of which were posted earlier by others---and highlighted certain points within them which pertain to the particular thread they appear in. I have posted verifiable links to sources of information which pertains to my comments. That can be construed as what you call "educational," while fish stories from LRL promoters cannot. And neither can your one-sided insults and snide remarks, which, other than your one story about your use of one LRL and how it didn't really work, is all you have ever posted.

It is good to see that you are still trying to convince yourselves that your opinions in your posts are correct..Keep it up as you may find someone who will believe you.

You try to use your one story about one LRL to base your claim that you are unbiased, while the vast majority of your posts merely attack those who post facts about these fraudulent devices.

He tells a very simple story that is very believable to treasure hunters.

You have read the definition of "skeptic," and I assume that you can see that it is an intentional misrepresentation, with the intent to water-down the viewpoints of those who post verifiable facts which prove the LRL scam.

Yes we have..You are a skeptic

Are you trying to claim that you haven't read all those posts which state that debunkers are not "skeptics"? Again you have been caught, trying to falsely claim innocence by ignorance

.
If the definition fits you have to wear it.

P.S. When will you start posting on-topic, about LRL devices, rather than attacking people?

He wants to learn about LRL’s but the skeptics keep getting in the way...Art

 

[EE THr]

Re: "There are about 200 or so distinct magnetic effects.

Once again, the skeptics could not find any info on the internet to copy and parrot. 200 distinct magnetic effects and nobody named a single one? I thought all the skeptics were know-it-alls. Well, you learn something new every day. If you don't know it, change the subject, attack the LRL user.

I thought you were here to educate, as evidenced by your informative post concerning magic and marketing, and the other "tips" for the gullible. Then why don't you just post your alleged list yourself?---Except that it has nothing to do with LRLs, that is.

First they're radio tranceivers (even though they neither transmit nor receive), then they're bio-energy sensors, they they're mystery energy operated, and now they detect 200 "different" types of magnetism---even in nonmagnetic objects. Next you will contrive a machine that will supposedly make gold jump up out of the ground and come to you! I can hardly wait for that one.