I am sure some vein deposits of gold were formed over long periods of time, and others were formed in short periods of time. The hardest part still is locating where gold rich water far below the surface once flowed, or is flowing today. When pressure is released on high temperature water, the energy goes into vaporizing the water into steam. Usually when pressure is reduced, temperatures go down, simply because reducing pressure usually involves increasing the volume of the area where the liquid is being contained within. Which is what drives this instantaneous gold deposit formation theory. When earthquakes cause veins where gold rich water is flowing to enlarge in size OR to open them up to atmospheric pressure at the surface(which is far lower), gold will precipitate out of the water as the water flashes into steam. And such precipitations might close off the vein to more water coming in, or the fact that the vein is now no longer pressurized prevents any water coming back into it from achieving the temperature and pressure necessary to re-dissolve the gold back into solution.
Good points UncleMatt. The
Gay-Lussac law of gas volume/temperature does play a part and assuming the gas volume doesn't change that law would lead to loss of heat energy as the pressure is reduced. I presume that is where you reached the assumption there is a net heat loss?
Of course there is a lot more in play than simple absolute gas volume/temperature. The latent heat of crystallization plays a large part in that heat equation when you are talking about saturated solutions crystallizing.
When you go from a high energy state of matter (gas, melt or liquid) to the low energy state of solid matter there is a release of heat energy. This is known as the
latent heat of crystallization. You have to get rid of the latent heat of crystallization, in order to form crystals in the solid. Then you get an undercooling phenomena and super saturation before crystals can form, because the atoms work to get rid of the latent heat of crystallization before crystals can form. This heat has to be released and taken up by something else before crystallization can happen. So you have the cooling inherent in converting a liquid state to a gas and the resultant heating of a liquid state metal crystallizing as a solid.
When crystallization occurs there is an exothermic reaction that releases heat back into the solution/vapor. This is an important point in understanding crystallization/deposition of metals and salts at great pressures and heat. Often the deposition fails because of the excess heat pushing the same crystallizing metals right back into solution - resulting in an endothermic reaction (heat loss) to once again equalize the solute/pressure.
This is complex stuff but it's important to understanding how these ore bodies form. Not surprisingly that heat/pressure endothermic/exothermic balance is often tipped one way or another by the chemistry interactions within the melts, solutions and solids.
Here is an interesting take on how these interactions create the very same cracking and deposition that may take place in earthquakes and result in metallic ore bodies.
Here is a very interesting paper on how different magma chemistry depressurizations result in different temperature gradients. Notice how the chemistry of one example results in cooling as the magma depressurizes, expands and crystallizes and a different chemistry results in accelerating heating as the magma depressurizes, expands and crystallizes. Chemistry being the defining factor not heat or pressure.
I simplified when I explained the crystallization deposition as creating an increase of heat in the solution and you simplified when you explained that a reduction in vapor pressure resulted in a decrease in heat. The truth is mother nature could care less about simple answers and often produces unique and valuable lessons in just how it really works out. I for one am fascinated by the interplay of natural laws like the Gay-Lussac equation and the latent heat of crystallization. I like the variety and complexity of natural life and as long as I try to explain it in simple terms old ma nature will instruct me with the reality of a complex world. That's a good thing in my book.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply Matt.
Heavy Pans