US Supreme Court rules against Fayetteville videographer in pirate ship lawsuit

Divertwrk

Jr. Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
33
Reaction score
66
Golden Thread
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
“After this ruling, and you’re an artist and your painting’s in the North Carolina Museum of Art or you post a photo of a North Carolina lighthouse on your website or you write a piece of music and they’re playing it in a North Carolina museum, the state has every right to take it and infringe on your copyright,” Allen said. “It’s open season on intellectual property owners now.” https://www.fayobserver.com/news/20200323/us-supreme-court-rules-against-fayetteville-videographer-in-pirate-ship-lawsuit
 

Sovereign immunity is nothing new.
 

Neither is sovereign aggression.
 

So... the answer to this problem of power greed is... give nothing that you want to be recognized or reimbursed for.

Sharing with officials has always been a one way street when dealing with them.

Tis a shame.
 

Neither is sovereign aggression.

No, but the article is written as if a government being immune from suit is some major change to the law. It's not and if anything, sovereign immunity has been gradually eroded over time (at least in some respects).
 

Time to get a low price lawyer. Good luck.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom