Skiddum
Sr. Member
I was thinking about this for awhile today. you always find people trying to figure out how well things work. I've been there myself a few different times.
The testing would be done in special channel's. each piece of equipment would be set up spacifically to the inventers instructions. and there would be multiple test ran. fast water slow, water, water changing from fast to slow and vise versa. and those pieces of equipment that have things that can be moved, pulled out or changed would be to test the equipment with and without the spacific pieces. Like a keene a51. you can remove the corrugated steel without having to glue the may down. any altering the equipment would be off limits. pretty much the test would be as the equipment is sold. each test would also be tested on course gold Quarter inch to 50 mesh and fine gold 50 to 150. and even 150 to 300. each piece of equipment would be tested with the same amount of material, the same weight, the results wouldn't be based on good or poor they'd be based on weight captured and lost. everything from centrafuge systems to pans.
the people testing them would be unbiased to each piece. because that would be there job. I've seen allot of people who use 1 piece of equipment for so long that they refuse to even use another piece of equipment. witch may or may not be a bad thing.
All findings would be put up for everyone to see for themselves and then they could decide based on truths not what each company says is true. I know allot of people wouldn't pay no attention to these but many more would. and they'd be backed by each company. There's allot of equipment out there. and no piece has perfect recovery but the testing would allow everyone to see how well each does and it would give each company good data that they could use to upgrade.
I don't know I think it would be a great idea. but I think not many companies would want to do it either just because they have there own testing but they don't post there findings.
The testing would be done in special channel's. each piece of equipment would be set up spacifically to the inventers instructions. and there would be multiple test ran. fast water slow, water, water changing from fast to slow and vise versa. and those pieces of equipment that have things that can be moved, pulled out or changed would be to test the equipment with and without the spacific pieces. Like a keene a51. you can remove the corrugated steel without having to glue the may down. any altering the equipment would be off limits. pretty much the test would be as the equipment is sold. each test would also be tested on course gold Quarter inch to 50 mesh and fine gold 50 to 150. and even 150 to 300. each piece of equipment would be tested with the same amount of material, the same weight, the results wouldn't be based on good or poor they'd be based on weight captured and lost. everything from centrafuge systems to pans.
the people testing them would be unbiased to each piece. because that would be there job. I've seen allot of people who use 1 piece of equipment for so long that they refuse to even use another piece of equipment. witch may or may not be a bad thing.
All findings would be put up for everyone to see for themselves and then they could decide based on truths not what each company says is true. I know allot of people wouldn't pay no attention to these but many more would. and they'd be backed by each company. There's allot of equipment out there. and no piece has perfect recovery but the testing would allow everyone to see how well each does and it would give each company good data that they could use to upgrade.
I don't know I think it would be a great idea. but I think not many companies would want to do it either just because they have there own testing but they don't post there findings.
Upvote
0
