...... Lets have the countries in question verify legality ......
Twoguns, regarding the above quote from you: Notice that Keppy brings up an interesting point, of how he'd go about "determining legality", if he were about to go to a foreign country: he would go talk to hunters in that country (you can find Tnet members, or detector dealers, other countries, right?). And if those local hunters say "sure no problem", then so-be-it.
But I notice in your above quote that you want to
"have the countries in question verify legality". Ok, think long and hard about this. I know it sounds wonderful to
not take just "any old Joe's" information, right? I mean, gee, what if that person, and all the md'rs in that club or country are ... uh .... simply breaking the law? It's certainly possible to be hunting a spot, with no problem for years, and even having gotten a "yes" from someone years ago, but that you still might ...... if you looked long enough and hard enough, find *SOME* law that ...... given enough morphing .... could be made to apply. For example let's say Keppy got locals that told him
"sure, no problem, we hunt till we're blue in the face and have never had a problem". But for two-guns, he wants to make sure, and have the "country themselves" confirm this information, right? So you, or someone on the net, goes to various desk-bound bureaucrat's in the federal capitol there. This "pressing question" gets passed back and forth between various desks (one of which will no doubt be the archie's desk). Eventually, someone morphs cultural heritage verbage, antiquities things, and disturbing earthworms verbage, and PRESTO: they tell you "no". So you go on to the net, post this new-found disturbing information, which then gets linked to other websites. Afterall, it's a newly created up-to-date compendium of where it's legal to hunt. And then gee, we can all breath a sigh of relief knowing there's ANOTHER place you CAN'T hunt.
Thus no, do not ask silly questions of bored bureaucrats. If locals there say "sure, no problem", then ...... good enough.