junk250
Greenie
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 5
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- North Central Ky.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
At first glance Kentucky seems to be represented as a common hunting ground shared by a few tribes in the woodland period, but not "inhabited" as a general rule.
There are stories of "Indian wars" around the falls of the Ohio(woodland I think), and they found a burial ground when they constructed the "Falls of Ohio" Museum. And also found a Palio site a few miles away.
Seems to me the area was always "inhabited", what do you think ?
There are other Palio Indian sites found in western KY, and Cumberland point ect.
I say BS, Kentucky was always "inhabited" from Woodland to Palio what do you think ?
Best, junk250
There are stories of "Indian wars" around the falls of the Ohio(woodland I think), and they found a burial ground when they constructed the "Falls of Ohio" Museum. And also found a Palio site a few miles away.
Seems to me the area was always "inhabited", what do you think ?
There are other Palio Indian sites found in western KY, and Cumberland point ect.
I say BS, Kentucky was always "inhabited" from Woodland to Palio what do you think ?
Best, junk250
Last edited:
Upvote
0