1819 Capped Bust Half for the collection

VERMONTPACKRAT

Bronze Member
Aug 6, 2007
2,243
391
Topsham, Vermont
Detector(s) used
Minelab 705, Garrett ace 250

Attachments

  • IMG_0014_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0014_1_1.JPG
    63.8 KB · Views: 326
  • IMG_0016_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0016_1_1.JPG
    61.7 KB · Views: 316
  • IMG_0028_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0028_1_1.JPG
    68.2 KB · Views: 320
  • IMG_0023_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0023_1_1.JPG
    73.5 KB · Views: 317
  • IMG_0026_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0026_1_1.JPG
    72.7 KB · Views: 317
OP
OP
VERMONTPACKRAT

VERMONTPACKRAT

Bronze Member
Aug 6, 2007
2,243
391
Topsham, Vermont
Detector(s) used
Minelab 705, Garrett ace 250
Thanks for the reply, Damon64 !

Any one out there brave enough to throw out a guess on the grade ? I am sure some one is coin savy enough to get close if not right on :wink:

VPR
 

savant365

Silver Member
Mar 28, 2007
3,918
71
Northwest Missouri
Detector(s) used
ACE 250
I would say that coin has 90% of its original detail so that would put it in the XF but not quite AU area. Whatever its grade is it's a beautiful coin, thanks for sharing it with us.

HH Charlie
 

mainer

Silver Member
May 3, 2005
3,405
38
Maine
Detector(s) used
Minelab Etrac
Fisher F75 SE
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I'll jump on the XF-40 bandwagon. :wink: Its a beautiful coin VPR. Will look great in your collection. :thumbsup:
 

OP
OP
VERMONTPACKRAT

VERMONTPACKRAT

Bronze Member
Aug 6, 2007
2,243
391
Topsham, Vermont
Detector(s) used
Minelab 705, Garrett ace 250
Looks like we have some pretty good coin graders here at Tnet !

Mainer hit it right on the head with the XF40 :notworthy:

VPR

 

Attachments

  • IMG_0030_1_1.JPG
    IMG_0030_1_1.JPG
    80.1 KB · Views: 283

Don in SJ

Silver Member
May 20, 2005
4,931
832
Detector(s) used
MINELAB SE Pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Interesting grade, I have no experience in grading, since it is so subjective, you can send the same coin back to another company and get a different grading and probably back to the same company and possibly have that happen also. :dontknow: :)

But, I personally think that it was a very gracious grading of the coin, I must be the only one who thought a lower grade :D If I had replied before you posted the complete slab I would have said VF35, which would only be one grade lower than what they said, I think.

I was ready to say XF-40 until I looked at the stars, now not knowing if they take that into account or not, but the detail on the left side is either weak strike or wear, perhaps it is weak strike. The other wear patterns are borderline for XF in my guesstimate of an opinion.

Makes me wonder how the two I found last year would be graded, despite being grounders.

Don
 

OP
OP
VERMONTPACKRAT

VERMONTPACKRAT

Bronze Member
Aug 6, 2007
2,243
391
Topsham, Vermont
Detector(s) used
Minelab 705, Garrett ace 250
Don,
In hand the coin has alot of original luster. Pretty unusual for the grade. Maybe that was a factor in the final grade of XF40 :dontknow:


VPR
 

Don in SJ

Silver Member
May 20, 2005
4,931
832
Detector(s) used
MINELAB SE Pro
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
VERMONTPACKRAT said:
Don,
In hand the coin has alot of original luster. Pretty unusual for the grade. Maybe that was a factor in the final grade of XF40 :dontknow:


VPR

Yes, if we knew how they did it on all coins, it would be much easier to figure out, sometimes I think they are like weathermen, throw a dart. :) Also, for us to really know what the coin looks like can sometimes be a challenge from on-line photos, since usually the photos bring out the worst in a coin, compared to naked eye. :wink:

Because of your post I just spent time rephotographing and re identifying all my found Bust silver,(LOL, only 5 coins) and think I have them all properly ID'd right now, and really will not worry about grading, since they are ground found, would only be really interested if one of them would have turned out to be a rare variety, but none of them are.

Don
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top