A question on a quarter

[bartholomewroberts]

I tend to lurk here... dial up speed makes posting on a regular basis a true pain in the kiester. However, I do enjoy all the threads and read each and every one,

I went to the bank yesterday and managed to get $100.00 in quarters and $100.00 in dimes. It was skunk on the quarters with one unusual coin. At first, when I looked at the eagle, I thought... silver. However, the date, 1978, negated that. But when I look at it, the head and the eagle appear to be silver... or more appropriately each has a `frosted`appearance.

Any ideas of what it might be.... and I am sorry about the lack of pictures.... again, dial up negates anything like that unless I wish to spend a large amount of time for things to upload

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges - Grab it through Amazon!

[n8dagr8345]

Might be a proof coin. Or it could be some aftermarket paint job.

 

[The_EE]

What is the mint mark on the Quarter?

 

[Marchas45]

If it's not an S mint mark then the quarter is coated with something and no value except a quarter.

 

[namster]

Sounds like a proof to me. But check the mint mark, should be S.

I went through a box with 7-8 silver plated halves. WTF? Who is spending time and money on that? Its pretty obvious from looking at the edge that they are plated. Way too bright.

 

[bartholomewroberts]

Just looked.... it has a S to the right of Washingtons head

 

[Generic_Lad]

Just looked.... it has a S to the right of Washingtons head

Proof quarter

 

[ckrakowski]

it is a proof. keep it. after all all you are sitting on is 25 cents. lucky.

 

[Th3Offspring]

dial up still exists!? lol jkjk but nice find on the proof .25!

 

[mountainman 2]

I think they did make silver quarter proofs in 1978. How does it sound when dropped on a table as opposed to a clad quarter?

 

[bartholomewroberts]

dial up still exists!? lol jkjk but nice find on the proof .25!

Where I live, it is dial up or nothing... Even cell phones do not work here.. But at least I have access, albeit limited speed access

On the plus side, I have 20 plus acres with my own river... no mortgage and all the growing, hunting and fishing I want.

 

[Generic_Lad]

I think they did make silver quarter proofs in 1978. How does it sound when dropped on a table as opposed to a clad quarter?

No, other than the 40% Bicenentennial set, all quarters have been the standard copper-nickel variety since 1965. Silver proof sets started up in 1992.

 

[fistfulladirt]

dial up still exists!? lol jkjk but nice find on the proof .25!

Where I live, it is dial up or nothing... Even cell phones do not work here.. But at least I have access, albeit limited speed access

On the plus side, I have 20 plus acres with my own river... no mortgage and all the growing, hunting and fishing I want.

Congrats on the quarter. Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet? Mifi probly wouldnt work if you have no cellular reception.

 

[mountainman 2]

I think they did make silver quarter proofs in 1978. How does it sound when dropped on a table as opposed to a clad quarter?

No, other than the 40% Bicenentennial set, all quarters have been the standard copper-nickel variety since 1965. Silver proof sets started up in 1992.

Yes, you're correct GL. I had googled 78 silver proofs sets earlier and though someone had one for sale. When i searched again tonight, i saw something else saying that no silver proofs sets were minted in 77 or 78. My mistake. Live and learn.

 

[madwest]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

 

[bartholomewroberts]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

That is exactly my problem up here.... I pay $20.00 a month for dial up.. Satellite is about $60.00 per month for not appreciably faster service... I cannot justify the extra expense for marginal service improvement.

 

[The_EE]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

That is exactly my problem up here.... I pay $20.00 a month for dial up.. Satellite is about $60.00 per month for not appreciably faster service... I cannot justify the extra expense for marginal service improvement.

I simply wont live anywhere I cant get high speed. As stated in another thread, I have been online for 30 years. I started out on 120 baud dial up connection ( 56.6 is 56,600 baud to give you an idea of how slow it used to be ).

went to Speedtest.net and tested my connection twice.

119 ping - 30.83 mb down - 3.06 mb up
117 ping - 32.51 mb up - 3.07 mb down

Basically, I can download 1000 megs or nearly 300 songs in about 6 minutes.

In fact, most of the TV I watch is from Hulu or the broad cast channels website. I can watch it when I want let alone be tied to a specific time. I could not live without my internet connection.

 

[bartholomewroberts]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

That is exactly my problem up here.... I pay $20.00 a month for dial up.. Satellite is about $60.00 per month for not appreciably faster service... I cannot justify the extra expense for marginal service improvement.

I simply wont live anywhere I cant get high speed. As stated in another thread, I have been online for 30 years. I started out on 120 baud dial up connection ( 56.6 is 56,600 baud to give you an idea of how slow it used to be ).

went to Speedtest.net and tested my connection twice.

119 ping - 30.83 mb down - 3.06 mb up
117 ping - 32.51 mb up - 3.07 mb down

Basically, I can download 1000 megs or nearly 300 songs in about 6 minutes.

In fact, most of the TV I watch is from Hulu or the broad cast channels website. I can watch it when I want let alone be tied to a specific time. I could not live without my internet connection.

I can appreciate the fact that you want high speed.. To me, although high speed would be wonderful, I want the security of my own land first. The times are too tenuous right now for me.

I enjoy people... but I love the fact that my closest neighbour is one mile away.

To each his own.

And with dial up, at least I do have internet service

 

[The_EE]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

That is exactly my problem up here.... I pay $20.00 a month for dial up.. Satellite is about $60.00 per month for not appreciably faster service... I cannot justify the extra expense for marginal service improvement.

I simply wont live anywhere I cant get high speed. As stated in another thread, I have been online for 30 years. I started out on 120 baud dial up connection ( 56.6 is 56,600 baud to give you an idea of how slow it used to be ).

went to Speedtest.net and tested my connection twice.

119 ping - 30.83 mb down - 3.06 mb up
117 ping - 32.51 mb up - 3.07 mb down

Basically, I can download 1000 megs or nearly 300 songs in about 6 minutes.

In fact, most of the TV I watch is from Hulu or the broad cast channels website. I can watch it when I want let alone be tied to a specific time. I could not live without my internet connection.

I can appreciate the fact that you want high speed.. To me, although high speed would be wonderful, I want the security of my own land first. The times are too tenuous right now for me.

I enjoy people... but I love the fact that my closest neighbour is one mile away.

To each his own.

And with dial up, at least I do have internet service

I would love having everyone far away as well but I cant do without. I am torn in two directions

 

[bartholomewroberts]

. . . Slightly off topic I have to ask, have you looked into sattellite internet?

Satellite internet will work anywhere in North America.

It is better in some respects than dial up. I went from dial up to satellite (Starband) to cellular/EVDO. Satellite was good for large downloads - much, much better than dial up (1Mbps). It was marginally better than dial up for uploads (200-300kbps). The huge disappointment was browsing (50-60kbps). It is really no better for browsing than dial up. The problem is with the multiplexing that they do along with the latency overhead to go to space and back for every xfr.

I paid $900 for equipment and installation but had no problem whatsoever pitching that equipment into the recycling dumpster when I found the first alternative that came along.

That is exactly my problem up here.... I pay $20.00 a month for dial up.. Satellite is about $60.00 per month for not appreciably faster service... I cannot justify the extra expense for marginal service improvement.

I simply wont live anywhere I cant get high speed. As stated in another thread, I have been online for 30 years. I started out on 120 baud dial up connection ( 56.6 is 56,600 baud to give you an idea of how slow it used to be ).

went to Speedtest.net and tested my connection twice.

119 ping - 30.83 mb down - 3.06 mb up
117 ping - 32.51 mb up - 3.07 mb down

Basically, I can download 1000 megs or nearly 300 songs in about 6 minutes.

In fact, most of the TV I watch is from Hulu or the broad cast channels website. I can watch it when I want let alone be tied to a specific time. I could not live without my internet connection.

I can appreciate the fact that you want high speed.. To me, although high speed would be wonderful, I want the security of my own land first. The times are too tenuous right now for me.

I enjoy people... but I love the fact that my closest neighbour is one mile away.

To each his own.

And with dial up, at least I do have internet service

I would love having everyone far away as well but I cant do without. I am torn in two directions

But at least you can get to a number of banks in a reasonable time.... I have only one tiny CU where I live.

When I go to town is the time I get my rolls to search.... and that happens only every 10 - 14 days