Back from our trip/ we have proof the Vikings were here before the Templars

[Treasure_Hunter]

Per our rules and terms.

"When the purpose of the original post has been fulfilled, the thread should end. If you want to talk about something else, start a new thread in an appropriate forum."


Sent from my P008 using Tapatalk

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[lokiblossom]

You might as well lock the thread until the film crew OK's them to post pictures or documentation or something relating to some of the proof claimed in the title of the thread.Because there is nothing to discus until something in the way of proof is offered.

This whole statement sounds contradictory. IMHO, if anybody should be able to say "lock the thread, we are finished discussion on the topic", I think it would be the starter of the thread, FK. Also IMHO, this subject is related to Oak Island because of the following, the story of Oak Island brought us to this point, the coconut fibres on Oak Island and their dating point to a Knights Templar connection as do the drilled stones and the stone triangle points to the trail that would have led to New Ross alongside the Gold River.
The coconut fibres have been argued to death on this forum, but the evidence is certainly with that identity and the dating has been confirmed to before the 14th century. I'm sure this last statement will draw detractors, but again, my point is, there is an Oak Island New Ross connection.
The Old Oak Island Forum went back and forth between the Island and New Ross for many years before being ended for lack of interest.
Cheers, Loki

 

[Charlie P. (NY)]

The problem is this thread is in the wrong forum starting with the initial post - it has nothing to do with Oak Island.

Someone might mention Forest Fenn here but that doesn't mean all future Forest Fenn discussions should be here.

 

[jeff of pa]

This whole statement sounds contradictory. IMHO, if anybody should be able to say "lock the thread, we are finished discussion on the topic", I think it would be the starter of the thread, FK. Also IMHO, this subject is related to Oak Island because of the following, the story of Oak Island brought us to this point, the coconut fibres on Oak Island and their dating point to a Knights Templar connection as do the drilled stones and the stone triangle points to the trail that would have led to New Ross alongside the Gold River.
The coconut fibres have been argued to death on this forum, but the evidence is certainly with that identity and the dating has been confirmed to before the 14th century. I'm sure this last statement will draw detractors, but again, my point is, there is an Oak Island New Ross connection.
The Old Oak Island Forum went back and forth between the Island and New Ross for many years before being ended for lack of interest.
Cheers, Loki

thank you for the explanation of the connection

and yes you are correct. only o.p.'s can request a thread they started be closed.
and only mods and admins can execute the closure or refuse to close the thread
on our opinions.

 

[Pippin]

For those interested this is a link to another stone found in western Nova Scotia. It was found in Mount Hanley in Annapolis County on the north mountain. The book that has referenced it is about Oak Island and its mysteries.


https://books.google.ca/books?id=aV...EISDAG#v=onepage&q=mount hanley stone&f=false

 

[Raparee]

... but again, my point is, there is an Oak Island New Ross connection.

Argument presupposes that there is or was "something" on Oak Island that is connected with the "something" that is or was at New Ross. Nothing has been found on Oak Island, and nothing has been found at New Ross, so there is no Oak Island / New Ross connection.

 

[lokiblossom]

Argument presupposes that there is or was "something" on Oak Island that is connected with the "something" that is or was at New Ross. Nothing has been found on Oak Island, and nothing has been found at New Ross, so there is no Oak Island / New Ross connection.

Still living in opposite land eh!

Cheers, Loki

 

[Raparee]

Still living in opposite land eh!

Cheers, Loki

Nope. Moved to Factville quite some time ago.

 

[FinderKeeper]

Hay look at what we found at New Ross, tell me again there is no proof of a castle at this site. This key stone weighs over 1 ton. The upper left corner has been broken off as shown in photo. We have found many key stones like this one but smaller. The stones in the background are from the castle to, the castle is gone but the stones that built it are still on site.

 

[FinderKeeper]

View attachment 1470400

View attachment 1470401

The government will be on site in a few weeks to check this out. We have many drilled and cut stones just sitting on the ground waiting to be used. Some buried deep in the ground. Some of the tools used to shape them were found to.

 

[FinderKeeper]

View attachment 1470404

View attachment 1470405

View attachment 1470406

These stones have been at this site for many years and are deep into the ground. Not drilled in the 1800's that's for sure. Now what do you think. I am sure you will have a lot to say now.

 

[FinderKeeper]

View attachment 1470407

View attachment 1470408

View attachment 1470409

Most of these drilled stones are for the Stonehenge site, they look to be the lintel stones that set on top of the standing stones. They are arched and about 10' or longer.

 

[jeff of pa]

The government will be on site in a few weeks to check this out. We have many drilled and cut stones just sitting on the ground waiting to be used. Some buried deep in the ground. Some of the tools used to shape them were found to.

this shape reminds me of the side of a Bridge over a small stream.
though I suppose it could have been a decorative piece for
the top of a Wall or Building.

is that a Date on it ?

I think I see a 17

 

[Charlie P. (NY)]

Hay look at what we found at New Ross, tell me again there is no proof of a castle at this site.

There is no proof of a castle at that site. There is a stone that may or may not have been intended to be or ever was used as a keystone. One stone does not a castle make.

New Ross is by a river, is it not? Possibly construction of a railroad or canal or bridge used some local rock. People used rock for LOTS of things besides castles.



In fact, here's a stone bridge in Nova Scotia.



But the good news is that a structure which would use a keystone of that size would be huge and require massive foundations. You should easily find those . . . if they were to have ever existed.

 

[Raparee]

this shape reminds me of the side of a Bridge over a small stream.
though I suppose it could have been a decorative piece for
the top of a Wall or Building.

is that a Date on it ?

I think I see a 17

It looks like any stone that has been split with wedges and feathers... tools that are still being used today.

 

[Raparee]

Hay look at what we found at New Ross, tell me again there is no proof of a castle at this site. This key stone weighs over 1 ton. The upper left corner has been broken off as shown in photo. We have found many key stones like this one but smaller. The stones in the background are from the castle to, the castle is gone but the stones that built it are still on site. View attachment 1470398 View attachment 1470399

... a one ton keystone on those piddly little foundations shown in Joan's photos? Right.

When you had a geologist, or even professional stone worker look at these stones, what did they tell you?

 

[lokiblossom]

... a one ton keystone on those piddly little foundations shown in Joan's photos? Right.

When you had a geologist, or even professional stone worker look at these stones, what did they tell you?

Those piddly little foundations were indeed foundations, even one of the experts you detractors rally around said that, and they could have supported somewhat significant buildings. Do you know what was there? You or I have no idea of the size or area of these buildings, but there were many large fortresses throughout north America built on lesser foundations. You claim there was nothing at Oak Island or Charing Cross (New Ross) but as always you are wrong again. At Oak Island we have documented, drilled stones that nobody seems to understand, a stone triangle that pointed at the trail alongside the Gold River and coconut fibre dated to between the 12th and 14th century which among earlier identifications, I also watched being identified by an expert on tv.
Cheers, Loki

 

[sasquash]

Could you fix the links on posts # 70-71-72 ?
Just curious to see the pictures.

 

[Pippin]

... a one ton keystone on those piddly little foundations shown in Joan's photos? Right.

When you had a geologist, or even professional stone worker look at these stones, what did they tell you?

Do you think those photos were taken at New Ross?

 

[Pippin]

Those piddly little foundations were indeed foundations, even one of the experts you detractors rally around said that, and they could have supported somewhat significant buildings. Do you know what was there? You or I have no idea of the size or area of these buildings, but there were many large fortresses throughout north America built on lesser foundations. You claim there was nothing at Oak Island or Charing Cross (New Ross) but as always you are wrong again. At Oak Island we have documented, drilled stones that nobody seems to understand, a stone triangle that pointed at the trail alongside the Gold River and coconut fibre dated to between the 12th and 14th century which among earlier identifications, I also watched being identified by an expert on tv.
Cheers, Loki

So a secret settlement was made at Charing Cross and they made a marker pointing to it. Doesn't make much sense to me.