Beale Decoder website

bigscoop

Gold Member
Jun 4, 2010
13,380
8,708
Wherever there be treasure!
Detector(s) used
Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
not scammy at all. i've been using it. it really helps trying new ideas.

Well, putting all of the other unlimited possibilities aside, how do you even know which of the alleged ciphers is 1 or 3?
You see, since length alone has absolutely no bearing on the content or order of the ciphers, then how can you even be certain that the author's claimed means of numbering the ciphers is accurate? What if his arranged order by length was backwards? Say, instead of long to short it should have been short to long?

You see, this is where the author's story starts to get seriously tripped up, the notion that he was able to arrange the ciphers according to their length and get them correct before he had even seen the C2 plain text. How did he know he was even suppose to number them, 1,2,3? :laughing7:
 

Rebel - KGC

Gold Member
Jun 15, 2007
21,680
14,739
Well, putting all of the other unlimited possibilities aside, how do you even know which of the alleged ciphers is 1 or 3?
You see, since length alone has absolutely no bearing on the content or order of the ciphers, then how can you even be certain that the author's claimed means of numbering the ciphers is accurate? What if his arranged order by length was backwards? Say, instead of long to short it should have been short to long?

You see, this is where the author's story starts to get seriously tripped up, the notion that he was able to arrange the ciphers according to their length and get them correct before he had even seen the C2 plain text. How did he know he was even suppose to number them, 1,2,3? :laughing7:
HA! C1/C3 are USELESS... RUSES (MHO). C2 is QUESTIONABLE, as a "decoded" thingie; just a Rebel "statement" (DOI) against "Honest Abe"... read it in THAT light. :coffee2:
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top