Fighting to save remains of a fort

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Fighting to save remains of a fort
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 12-10-07 | Edward Colimore

Paulsboro is home to a key military installation from the Revolutionary War.

Somewhere in the ground overlooking the Delaware River, amid the trees and brush at a Paulsboro oil-storage terminal, is a long-forgotten piece of American history. Identified on a British map 230 years ago as a "rebel fort," the site was the nation's first federal land purchase, made the day after the Declaration of Independence.

It's the "birthplace of homeland security," says a group of local historians, preservationists and municipal officials who hope to restore the fort as a national historic site.

They hope to uncover its earthen walls - and possibly a few brick or stone tunnels - as well as artifacts such as cannon and musket balls and other relics.

But their plans have hit a snag.

Fort Billingsport, which held off British ships for about a month in 1777, seems poised for another battle, this one over historic preservation.

The owner of the property, Pacific Atlantic Terminals L.L.C., has not allowed private archaeological access to the secured location, the local group says, and has not returned its calls or letters in months.

What's more, Pacific Atlantic is planning to expand its facilities near the fort site.

The company, a subsidiary of Plains All American Pipeline L.P. in Houston, issued a brief statement last week concerning its plans for the land, which is encircled by a fence topped with barbed wire.

"A third-party survey of the property has been conducted, and Pacific Atlantic Terminals L.L.C.'s Paulsboro terminal expansion does not encroach on the site where the earthen fortification is thought to have existed," said the company, which did not respond to requests for additional information.

The state plans to double-check that assessment. The Department of Environmental Protection's land-use division this month asked the agency's Historic Preservation Office to review the permit request for the expansion, DEP spokeswoman Darlene Yuhas said.

The office can order an archaeological survey if officials find a site has historical value.

Walter Quint, an assistant professor at Rowan University and a former Paulsboro school superintendent who is leading local preservation efforts, describes the fort, on roughly three acres, as "an extremely significant piece of land.

"Think about what happened on July 4, 1776, and then what happened the next morning. [The Continental] Congress' next act was securing the then-capital of Philadelphia. So the fort has a unique status," Quint said.

The state has listed a public tract, called Fort Billings Park, on its New Jersey Register of Historic Places. At the end of Delaware Street overlooking the river, it includes plaques memorializing the fort and honoring its designer and two soldiers who evacuated it in the face of a large British force.

A few feet away, Pacific Atlantic land believed to be the fort's location has been surveyed a few times over the years. The most recent survey, in 2006, revealed a depression in the ground about the size and shape of the fort's foundation, Quint said. The outline of the fort on a British map from 1777 generally matches the shape, he said.

Vincent Maresca, an archaeologist for the New Jersey Historic Preservation Office, said a historic preservation officer would review the terminal's expansion project and "can request an archaeological survey if it's determined there's a high potential for archaeological resources."

The fort was purchased for 600 pounds on July 5, 1776, and built on 96 acres of the Billingsport section of Paulsboro, said Quint, chairman of the Fort Billingsport Homeland Security Committee, a group of residents seeking to restore the site.

He said George Washington commissioned the Polish military engineer Thaddeus Kosciuszko to design a fortification that could stop British ships from reaching Philadelphia. Kosciuszko, whose abilities were admired by Washington and Thomas Jefferson, also helped design defenses at Philadelphia, Saratoga and West Point.

"Fort Billingsport was Kosciuszko's first job," said Quint, who lives in West Deptford. "His real genius was in the location. . . .

"It's at a perfect place. It was at the narrowest point of the river with a commanding view on a high piece of land about 30 to 40 feet above the Delaware."

The fort was built by New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and South Carolina troops and inspected by Washington on Aug. 1, 1777. The Americans trained cannon on the river, had a small navy of armed vessels, and embedded chevaux-de-frise - long iron-tipped poles - in the Delaware to pierce the bottoms of enemy vessels.

"They blockaded the river and slowed down the British ships," Quint said. "It took [the British] about a month to get past the fort. They sent a force of 1,500 troops by land, and the fort's defenders evacuated in a hurry."

Efforts to investigate the site stalled last summer, said members of the Fort Billings Homeland Security Committee, after the Paulsboro Planning Board approved expansion of the facility.

"Public access is needed to recreate the fort," Paulsboro Mayor John J. Burzichelli said. "We have to work through the security concerns, buffering the fort from the tank farm.

"We want people to be able to visit the site. This is an important page in America's early history, and we want to reclaim it so people can see it, not just talk about it."

Looking over the wooded tract, Quint summed up his group's feelings. "It's just a little piece of land, but it has tremendous historic significance. Frankly, it's a matter of pride for Paulsboro."
 

mrs.oroblanco

Silver Member
Jan 2, 2008
4,356
427
Black Hills of South Dakota
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Lobo & Garrett Stinger
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Interesting story, and a tough scenerio - at best.

Private Land-on one hand --- historic artifacts - on the other.

You'll have to keep us updated on this - its very interesting.

B
 

bootybay

Gold Member
Aug 9, 2007
11,314
120
NJ
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
EXCAL 2, SOV. GT
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
oh heck whats that new law here in nj...where they can take your property? and also, if any artifacts are discovered, arent they supposed to halt all construction till the archies get in .. this is sounding like a movie I saw too.. what a disgrace that current owner is..greedy P*&*@
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
Bootybay said:
oh heck whats that new law here in nj...where they can take your property? and also, if any artifacts are discovered, arent they supposed to halt all construction till the archies get in .. this is sounding like a movie I saw too.. what a disgrace that current owner is..greedy P*&*@

It comes down to the State of NJ vs. an oil company...The oil company wins, hands down. All they have to do is threaten to hold out on their "campaign donation".
 

N.J.THer

Silver Member
Nov 16, 2006
3,282
238
Middlesex County, New Jersey
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
Whites DFX w/ Sunray DX-1 probe and Minelab Excalibur 1000, Whites TRX Pinpointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
I read about this a few months back. I really have mixed feelings on this one. I don't like the fact that they can take a persons home to build luxury condos and shopping centers so I feel like I would have to support the company on this one as long as they are not building on the historic site. With real estate prices so low they many want to hold on to it until the markets turn around so they can get more for it. If they held it this long why should they be forced to sell it while the market is down.

Since 9-11 the security at these chemical storage facilities is extremely tight and if the fort site is too close to their tank farm, pipeline or the area they want to expand into they may not want the general public to have access to the area. Could lead to a terrorist action that would eliminate the fort site altogether. Just a possibility.

NJ
 

mrs.oroblanco

Silver Member
Jan 2, 2008
4,356
427
Black Hills of South Dakota
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Lobo & Garrett Stinger
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Eminent domain should not be used to take ANY private property away unless it is absolutely necessary - not for condo's, not for someone else to make money with - and not for archie's either. PRIVATE - is the key.

If we allow eminent domain to take away land for artifacts, there is hardly anywhere in this country that doesn't have their own brand of artifacts. The country will own ALL the land.

Eminent domain for necessary roads, etc., that CANNOT go anywhere else.

It's a 5th Amendment taking.

I know the sentiment about it being an oil company - but, its their private land.

B
 

Anthracite31

Newbie
Mar 25, 2008
2
0
I couldn't agree more mrs.oroblanco. I live down the street from this site. I would like them to work with the preservation committee to help protect the site. I would hate it to be turned over by force. It is shameful that they are not participating in this. I'm sure anyone of us would be willing to work with such a committee for such a cause, but if it were a cause that you didn't deem worthy would you want the state to come in and take your land? I'm guessing a few of you might be saying no. Sorry for rambling. I believe this was also part of Lincoln Amusement Park. Most of that property is now owned by Valero Oil. On the opposite side of Fort Billings is Sunoco Logistics pipeline to the Phila airport then Valero.
 

busterbrown

Tenderfoot
May 31, 2007
9
0
New Jersey South
Detector(s) used
Cobra
if i am not mistaking, am pretty sure about this, but befiore any land can be improved or otherwised built on, and it is known to contained historical valued the state must send a team down to dig the site, also if state does not, you can go to federal level and they will investigate, providing you have evidence that it does exist, also you can have a court block the improvements providing you have proof of the existence.
example: when they were building kings hwy in the 1950's they ran into artifacts that turned out to be a indian graveyard, it held up work for a long time until all the artiofacts were recovered.
new to take the news public, file a junction in court with evidence, in local and federal courts. federal would do it because the fort was federal staus and government would be very interested in that.................good luck
 

OP
OP
West Jersey Detecting

West Jersey Detecting

Gold Member
Oct 23, 2006
5,241
1,058
Philadelphia Area
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
Nokta Legend, Excalibur 1000/II (hybrid) , Teknetics T2 SE
Primary Interest:
Other
busterbrown said:
if i am not mistaking, am pretty sure about this, but befiore any land can be improved or otherwised built on, and it is known to contained historical valued the state must send a team down to dig the site, also if state does not, you can go to federal level and they will investigate, providing you have evidence that it does exist, also you can have a court block the improvements providing you have proof of the existence.
example: when they were building kings hwy in the 1950's they ran into artifacts that turned out to be a indian graveyard, it held up work for a long time until all the artiofacts were recovered.
new to take the news public, file a junction in court with evidence, in local and federal courts. federal would do it because the fort was federal staus and government would be very interested in that.................good luck

Thanks for the info and welcome to the forum!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top