Friday July 1st halves & dimes
nothing major but I am happy with the finds.
Halves
Box 1: 1965
Box 2: 1968-D
Box 3:1965, 1967(ender) was a bit concerned i didnt find the 65 till about the 40th roll, unusual for boxes with clad enders
Dimes
Box 1 (500): 1952-S, 1962-D, 1964
Box 2 (500): 1964-D, also found a 1967 its not an S mint but its silvery looking on the edge to. I think it might be Rhodium plated I'm gonna weigh it at my office Tuesday, the lab was a 3 decimal precision scale and then i'll try to get a pic up to.
Box 3 (500): Skunk
Box 4 (250): Skunk
Box 5 (250): Skunk
Box 6 (250): Skunk
Unusual that the big boxes outperformed the 250 size today....it would seem that the opposite would be true but from my experience so far i've had more results from the $250 size the last few months.
HH and Happy 4th All,
Bigheed
nothing major but I am happy with the finds.
Halves
Box 1: 1965
Box 2: 1968-D
Box 3:1965, 1967(ender) was a bit concerned i didnt find the 65 till about the 40th roll, unusual for boxes with clad enders
Dimes
Box 1 (500): 1952-S, 1962-D, 1964
Box 2 (500): 1964-D, also found a 1967 its not an S mint but its silvery looking on the edge to. I think it might be Rhodium plated I'm gonna weigh it at my office Tuesday, the lab was a 3 decimal precision scale and then i'll try to get a pic up to.
Box 3 (500): Skunk
Box 4 (250): Skunk
Box 5 (250): Skunk
Box 6 (250): Skunk
Unusual that the big boxes outperformed the 250 size today....it would seem that the opposite would be true but from my experience so far i've had more results from the $250 size the last few months.
HH and Happy 4th All,
Bigheed
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
0