mikeofaustin
Bronze Member
I myself think that he skirted the very question (avoided it). But let me get your thoughts. Let's chat after the video. (admins, this is not a video post, it's an everything else post).
Neil Tyson just arguing semantics, here. S.I. Hayakowa would be so happy. (If you don't know Hayakowa, look him up.)FarmerChick said:remember too that the words 'unidentified flying object' now mean flying saucer with aliens when someone says that term.
it is just what it is.....unidentified flying object.
it could be anything. it just means it is unidentified.
it is an object most likely
it is flying supposedly since it is in the air
so truly a "UFO" now just defaults to mean flying alien saucer type
when in reality it is just what it means yet man blow right past the true meaning of the term and right away think space aliens
Treasure_Hunter said:... you would sail off the edge of the world...
mikeofaustin said:I myself think that he skirted the very question (avoided it). But let me get your thoughts.
After ... slowly ... listening ... to it all ... I never ... heard ... a definate ... answer ... yes ... or ... no. I'd guess no.mikeofaustin said:I myself think that he skirted the very question (avoided it). But let me get your thoughts. Let's chat after the video. (admins, this is not a video post, it's an everything else post).
Kentucky Kache said:What does it matter if the guy says there is/could be life on other planets or not? Does it make it true or false, because he believes it? He's just a man, with a human brain, just like the rest of us.