QUESTIONS CRITICS ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER

[fenixdigger]

Say KK, talk about a needle in a haystack. Finding someone that cares what a person like that thinks,, lottsa luck.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[pronghorn]

time for them to man up or shut up.


ANSWER the questions or be guiet.

Don't know what guiet means,
sseug I gnilleps roop ssiP

Who made you forum King? you be guiet!

Your questions are laughable at best. Lets have a look....

1) Since you do not have hours of experience, why do you ask questions that you cannot comprehend the answers?

You assume they cannot comprehend your answers, you are wrong.

The question is illogical.
Lack of experience with an LRL doesn't disqualify an EE
from asking questions about them.
That is like saying a rocket scientist, who designs rockets
but has never been in outer space, is unqualified to answer
questions about how rockets work in outer space.

You want people to pick up L rods and experience
the swinging rods. Well I have and I realize it is just the
inability of the human being to keep them perfectly level
that causes them to swing, not your imagined signals.

You are only fooling yourself and you can't come to
grips with that, so you want others to believe what
you believe, that it is some unseen force
and not just you moving the rods.

And why would an EE even waste time getting experience
with a device he knows does not work as advertised. He
doesn't believe it works and you promoters have
stated many times that you have to believe in LRLs for
them to work. They are faith based, and electronics
engineering is based on science.

2) When you get an response, why do you object to the answer?

What an infantile question, your answers are objectionable,
simple as that!
If you ask someone a question, and their answer fall pathetically
short of being anything reasonable, do you not call them on it

3) Why do you believe your opinion is all important?

Right back atcha get real

4) What gives you the right to call people liars based on your "opinion"?

Again, get real! You continue to make false assertations with
absolutely no verification, that is not opinion, it is reality!
You question others right to call you on a lie,
I question why you believe you should be allowed to lie
without being called on it?

5) Why are you afraid to try the Sho-Nuff experiment or any others presented here?

Afraid? I don't think so.
Is the sho-nuff (that's really sad) experiment the
one where you take a silver quarter and try to dowse it
among other non targets? You try it in a TRUE double
blind test and be honest about the results you get.

What makes you think people haven't tried these
silly games?
I have!
Not once was I successful in dowsing the quarter.
I should mention I did it in true double blind
protocol and knowing the target position,
same results both ways, no signal at all.
The rods moved because I can't
keep them level, not because of anything else!

6) Why do you not post photos of ANYTHING you have found with any device?

If they did, would you suddenly realize LRLs are frauds made
to con people out of their hard earned money?

What does that question have to do with you
promoting fraudulent LRL's?

If someone posts a picture of a gold bar found using a
metal detector, then states LRL's are frauds, does the
posted picture of the gold add weight to their statement?

Or maybe you are insinuating that since someone hasn't
found any treasure, that means they aren't qualified to
call a fraud a fraud.
I have posted pictures of a white gold necklace with
diamonds, a buffalo skull, arrowheads and scrappers,
a knife, silver, does that mean you will change your
belief in LRLs, I don't think so.

It is a senseless question and any answer at all proves
nothing in the discussion of why you are promoting fraud.

7) Why are the same questions asked over and over after a response has been given?

This is your question #2 asked a slightly different way and the answer
is the same...
7) Why are the same questions asked over and over after a response has been given?
Because the response was inadequate and objectionable.

Apparently you don't understand how a discussion works. If you ask
a question, and you deem the answer inadequate or questionable, you
then question it, simple enough for you.

You post the same question multiple times in multiple threads
just hours after asking #7, classic, hypocracy isn't an asset.

Your questions aren't hard to answer, just a time waste.
Now you be guiet (sic)

 

[aarthrj3811]

Just wastng space Prong..Art

 

[EE THr]

Just wastng space Prong..Art

Merely another personal insult.

Why do the LRL promoters throw continuous insults, then whine if they occasionally get insulted back?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

You assume they cannot comprehend your answers, you are wrong.

The question is illogical.
Lack of experience with an LRL doesn't disqualify an EE
from asking questions about them.
That is like saying a rocket scientist, who designs rockets
but has never been in outer space, is unqualified to answer
questions about how rockets work in outer space.

This argument would only be valid if EE designs LRLs. Does he?

 

[EE THr]

If I'm not dancing with the ugly step sister, and I have no desire to do so, then why would I be upset if someone else is dancing with her? No, I'm not promoting anything. I don't even use LRLs, but if others do, and they say they work for them, then what's that to me? Let them dance with the one they choose.

You are supporting total freedom for one group, and no freedom for another group.

This corroborates that you are a hypocrite.

I know who and what I am, so you can stop wasting your smear tactics on me. Your time would be better spent putting down someone who cares what you think.

I'm just stating the facts, as documented in this thread.

Facts always trump opinions. That's life.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

You assume they cannot comprehend your answers, you are wrong.

The question is illogical.
Lack of experience with an LRL doesn't disqualify an EE
from asking questions about them.
That is like saying a rocket scientist, who designs rockets
but has never been in outer space, is unqualified to answer
questions about how rockets work in outer space.

This argument would only be valid if EE designs LRLs. Does he?

Your assertion of the requirement for validity is false.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Just wastng space Prong..Art

Merely another personal insult.

Why do the LRL promoters throw continuous insults, then whine if they occasionally get insulted back?

You mean like calling people hypocrites because they treasure hunt differently than you?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Your assertion of the requirement for validity is false.

Is that your opinion, or is it another thing you have "proven"?

 

[fenixdigger]

Well, well Prong at least you responded. I'm sorry you weren't geared for it. Oh, thanks for the spelling lesson, like my computer

doesn't red flag something, so a mispelled word has to be on porpose.

Despite what you have in your mind, some things are true. If you have to call people liars --ok do it. That old 'fooling yourself"

thing has long since fell out. The things you think I have lied about are real. If I post a lie it is an obvious attempt at humor and no one could mistake it.

You have fooled yourself about the reasons you had the reactions. Ask any utility worker. I'm not going to comment on the rest of your answers. If someone else feels like helping you, they can. The anger in your posts must cloud your understanding.

At least you made them. Good try.

Score--Stepping up and being a man--1 1/2 Cowards-0

 

[EE THr]

Just wastng space Prong..Art

Merely another personal insult.

Why do the LRL promoters throw continuous insults, then whine if they occasionally get insulted back?

You mean like calling people hypocrites because they treasure hunt differently than you?

I didn't call anyone a hypocrite, I point out that you factually are a hypocrite, as documented above in your own statements.

Your assumption that the reason I pointe that out, is false. So now you are a liar, also, as documented here.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Your assertion of the requirement for validity is false.

Is that your opinion, or is it another thing you have "proven"?

You cannot make up your own definition of logic.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey KK and LT..Did you notice the new tactic involving their insults?..art

 

[Kentucky Kache]

6) Why do you not post photos of ANYTHING you have found with any device?

If they did, would you suddenly realize LRLs are frauds made
to con people out of their hard earned money?

No. And in the same way, if an LRL user posts a pic of finds, would YOU believe that LRLs work? Of course you wouldn't. So why would they post them? And why do you guys keep asking them too?

I have posted pictures of a white gold necklace with
diamonds, a buffalo skull, arrowheads and scrappers,
a knife, silver, does that mean you will change your
belief in LRLs, I don't think so.

You say you found these things? Yeah, right. I demand proof. Anyone can claim they found something, but that doesn't make it true. No, you're just trying to deceive people into thinking you found those things. From now on every post you make will be followed by this post, and others just as ridiculous. Wouldn't that be nice? I wonder how long it would take you to run to the mods.

7) Why are the same questions asked over and over after a response has been given?

Because the response was inadequate and objectionable.

Apparently you don't understand how a discussion works. If you ask
a question, and you deem the answer inadequate or questionable, you
then question it, simple enough for you.

If you were given two different answers at two different times, what would you say then? You would say someone is lying. No, you would get two different answers only if people were as mixed up as you say they are. Apparently, they are not.

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Your assertion of the requirement for validity is false.

Is that your opinion, or is it another thing you have "proven"?

You cannot make up your own definition of logic.

I know, that ability is reserved for you and your kind, right?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

Hey KK and LT..Did you notice the new tactic involving their insults?..art

Yep. But it's only LRL users who insult. How pitiful.

 

[EE THr]

fenix brothers;

In response to your question of topic---

This is #32, in the bottom link.

32. [*g.]CA asks False Questions, which are based on premises that are false, so logical answers are literally impossible (Always make them prove their premises). These are known as "interrogatory statements," because they are shrouded in a question, while they covertly make a statement (the false premises). These are posed by very sneaky people who are trying not to be caught in their lies, but when they pose these phony questions, they already are!

CA is an abbreviation for Con Artist.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Kentucky Kache]

fenix brothers;

In response to your question of topic---

This is #32, in the bottom link.

32. [*g.]CA asks False Questions, which are based on premises that are false, so logical answers are literally impossible (Always make them prove their premises). These are known as "interrogatory statements," because they are shrouded in a question, while they covertly make a statement (the false premises). These are posed by very sneaky people who are trying not to be caught in their lies, but when they pose these phony questions, they already are!

Caught again? Sounds like you're having a bad day.

 

[aarthrj3811]

In response to your question of topic---
This is #32, in the bottom link.
32. [*g.]CA asks False Questions, which are based on premises that are false, so logical answers are literally impossible (Always make them prove their premises). These are known as "interrogatory statements," because they are shrouded in a question, while they covertly make a statement (the false premises). These are posed by very sneaky people who are trying not to be caught in their lies, but when they pose these phony questions, they already are!
CA is an abbreviation for Con Artist.

Your answers are amazing..Could you tell us how you were able to make up a list of answers 3 months ago?..Art

 

[EE THr]

fenix brothers;

In response to your question of topic---

This is #32, in the bottom link.

32. [*g.]CA asks False Questions, which are based on premises that are false, so logical answers are literally impossible (Always make them prove their premises). These are known as "interrogatory statements," because they are shrouded in a question, while they covertly make a statement (the false premises). These are posed by very sneaky people who are trying not to be caught in their lies, but when they pose these phony questions, they already are!

Caught again? Sounds like you're having a bad day.

#22 in the bottom link.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?