somehiker
Silver Member
- May 1, 2007
- 4,365
- 6,426
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
We also must remember how, even where documentation is readily available AND up to date, it's use is all too often subjective in nature.
...and there are several examples of that "subjective" on this thread in the mixing of fact with speculative fiction.We also must remember how, even where documentation is readily available AND up to date, it's use is all too often subjective in nature.
...and there are several examples of that "subjective" on this thread in the mixing of fact with speculative fiction.
"History is written by the victors." -- Winston Churchill . . . or was it?
I have not "cherry-pick-apart any theories" except when they were posted as being FACT..
Despite your attempts to cherry-pick-apart any theories which don't align with whatever YOU have decided is factual.
I'm not sure you even have a theory......do you ?? As in.....who,what, when and why ?
Pierre Plantard with help from others created the Priory of Sion in 1956 with a genealogy list proving he was a descendant of the French Merovingian Kings who claimed royal blood, SANGREAL, descent from Jesus and Mary Magdalene.The Prieur de Sion, usually rendered in English translation as Priory of Sion or Priory of Zion, has, since the 1970s, been an elusive protagonist in many works of pseudohistory. It has been characterized as anything from the most influential secret society in Western history to a modern Rosicrucian-esque ludibrium, but, ultimately, has been proven to be a hoax created by Pierre Plantard. Most of the evidence presented in support of claims pertaining to its historical existence, let alone significance, has not been considered authentic or persuasive by established historians, academics, and universities.
....
You are just mad cos you didn't find it and I did!!!
This is only a forum for discussion and that is all that you will get from me.
It is enough for me to write that the three of them are creditable Templar historians.
Now where is your information that they only write alternative Templar history?
You made that statement, now show me why I shouldn't believe them.
You can discredit a good historian and not back it up?