The Panic Has Started****

[Treasure_Hunter]

Thread is closed......... If you would like to discuss politics you can visit: http://www.usmessageboard.com/--------where political discussion is allowed and encouraged.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[jeff of pa]

Not sure if everyone gets this TH But I just checked the link &

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Its working now, when I was given it there was a mispelling in link, I forgot to correct it....

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Thread is unlocked at original posters request. Keep the politics out of the thread. When you start using liberal and conservative labels in posts it makes the post and thread political..... As long as posts are not political thread can remain open....

 

[rwd mo]

Who is really at fault is the people that throw out this nonsense on cable about kill every one and fighting constantly. This gets in kids minds after a while and when a person is de arranged or a little slow ,thats what happends the normal people would never do a killing etc. I blame the videos on tv and cable. Never would I let my children watch such garbage and killing machines etc. The people that make these videos don't care only for MONEY and thats all,after 10 yrs of this kids dont see the wrong it causes and goes off the deep end and then all people start blaming the people with guns. But have you ever noticed most guns are stolen from their parents or friends house. As was said people kill people guns don't. jmho

 

[Frankn]

The big boys are starting to move back and forth. Buying or selling gold or silver for there sweep fund and undervalued stocks for the profit. The rich are going to get richer and so are you if you can follow them, but like the old saying, you have to have money to make money. Frank

 

[ivan salis]

crispin -- at least you got the guts to say you can see how the main steam "media" has affected your point of veiw on what a assault weapon is * and how talking with us has educated you on what a "assault weapon" really is

various "knee jerk" / feel good---type of "it looks like a assault weapon" gun ban or hi cap magazine ban laws rapidly and rashly enacted in the horrorible aftermath of this event -- sadly will not solve the real long term issues * gun free zones * to the armed mentally ill or terrorist types are like throwing raw meat to lions --what we need is to "protect" those very same areas with armed security guards or cops --- "gun free zone" just translates into "lots of easily killed unarmed targets here come and get em bad guys" -- if a factory or bussiness had 300 to 600 employees at them , and had no "armed" security and someone came in a shot up the place killing lots of folks * the general public at large would most likely say the factory or bussiness owner was lax in their duty to protect their employees while on the job -- well kids are forced to go to school by law , parents are forced to hand them over to the schools for "education" by law or they get "punished" for not doing so (unless the parents "home school" which is on the rise) --it is my point of veiw that since many folks due to both mom and dad having to work to get by fiscally and thus home schooling not being a viable option for them -- they are basically "forced" to hand over their kids for a "public" education then its the schools duty to protect those kids that are handed over to them until they are returned back to those parents .-- and to that end * the best way to stop a armed bad man is with a armed good man * more honest words were never spoken.

 

[dieselram94]

crispin -- at least you got the guts to say you can see how the main steam "media" has affected your point of veiw on what a assault weapon is * and how talking with us has educated you on what a "assault weapon" really is

various "knee jerk" / feel good---type of "it looks like a assault weapon" gun ban or hi cap magazine ban laws rapidly and rashly enacted in the horrorible aftermath of this event -- sadly will not solve the real long term issues * gun free zones * to the armed mentally ill or terrorist types are like throwing raw meat to lions --what we need is to "protect" those very same areas with armed security guards or cops --- "gun free zone" just translates into "lots of easily killed unarmed targets here come and get em bad guys" -- if a factory or bussiness had 300 to 600 employees at them , and had no "armed" security and someone came in a shot up the place killing lots of folks * the general public at large would most likely say the factory or bussiness owner was lax in their duty to protect their employees while on the job -- well kids are forced to go to school by law , parents are forced to hand them over to the schools for "education" by law or they get "punished" for not doing so (unless the parents "home school" which is on the rise) --it is my point of veiw that since many folks due to both mom and dad having to work to get by fiscally and thus home schooling not being a viable option for them -- they are basically "forced" to hand over their kids for a "public" education then its the schools duty to protect those kids that are handed over to them until they are returned back to those parents .-- and to that end * the best way to stop a armed bad man is with a armed good man * more honest words were never spoken.

Extremely well said!
Have a great Christmas everyone!

 

[ivan salis]

common sense tells you that "soft targets" are the prefered ones of these whack job mass killer / terrorist types ( ever notice they do not attack military bases or police stations?)-- thats because they need lots of unarmed "victim" type people to be able to pull off a "mass killing" type of crime -- and where to better find lots of unarmed easy to kill people than a "gun free" school zone that has no cops or armed security * (young school kids are a lot easier to take on than adults --a adult might think of some sort of "improvised weapon" to use , young school kids will be too scared to fight back in general) -- its like turning a hungry lion loose in a pen of sheep with no shepard to protect them. -- if you got a armed bad guy thats wanting to kill folks -- you need to stop him , and by the way most likely your going to have to kill him to stop him * the fastest and easist way to do that is to shoot him dead ( and thus you need a armed "good man" to do that)

 

[Dano Sverige]

The Fort Hood shooting was a shooting that took place on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood, the most populous U.S. military installation in the world, located just outside Killeen, Texas.[SUP][/SUP]In the course of the shooting, a single gunman killed 13 people and wounded 29 others.
No "armed good men" on that base?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Dano, on an American base on our soil the only armed men are the MPs....... Military personel do not walk around armed on U.S. soil.........

 

[smokeythecat]

Everybody remember people killed people even wholesale long before gunpowder was ever invented.

 

[onfire]

The Fort Hood shooting was a shooting that took place on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood, the most populous U.S. military installation in the world, located just outside Killeen, Texas.In the course of the shooting, a single gunman killed 13 people and wounded 29 others.
No "armed good men" on that base?

[h=3]bases[/h] The Army prohibits soldiers from carrying personal firearms inside Fort Hood and other bases. They want to reduce casual violence among the soldiers. Military weapons are used only for training or by base security, and personal weapons were kept locked away by the provost marshal.[SUP][29][/SUP] Specialist Jerry Richard, a soldier working at the Readiness Center, said he felt this policy left the soldiers vulnerable to violent assaults: "Overseas you are ready for it. But here you can't even defend yourself."[SUP][119][/SUP]Jacob Sullum, an opponent of gun control, described the base as a "gun-free zone."[SUP][120][/SUP]

[h=3][/h]

 

[onfire]

 

[hellzpriest]

Just get ready for martial law.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

NAW...

 

[dieselram94]

Just get ready for martial law.

That is part of the overall plan

 

[hellzpriest]

That is part of the overall plan[/QUOTE]

I agree.

 

[Frankn]

There was a question posted at some Army facility as to wheather they would inforce a law to take guns from civilians. The overall responce was" HELL, NO ". You got to remember the army is, in effect, part of the people. Frank

 

[Dano Sverige]

Do they not remember that part of the oath they all took that states - " .....Foriegn and DOMESTIC..."? That word was inserted for a very good reason, and you're all becoming it!
Plus, if they're deployed and any of the sabre rattlers open fire, you can bet your mortgage those soldiers are going to fire back!