Where would you work a place like this?

Swartzie

Hero Member
Mar 15, 2009
791
52
Tuscarawas County, Ohio
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Tejon
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
I'm totally new to panning. We did find a flake recently, however the river is an hour and a half drive so I'm looking for something closer. At least I know there is gold in Ohio. In the river where the flake was found we were sucking cracks in the bedrock. The rivers near me don't have exposed bedrock like that. But, there are several places with large rocks that create the riffle effect in the water. So looking at the attached photos where would you start to work a place like this? Upstream, downstream, or right in the rocks? Both upstream and downstream are calm and downstream kind of meanders a bit around a bend.

Thanks for any input
-Swartzie
 

Attachments

  • DSC02392.JPG
    DSC02392.JPG
    79.3 KB · Views: 493
  • DSC02394.JPG
    DSC02394.JPG
    82 KB · Views: 485
Upvote 0

Gramps43

Full Member
Feb 27, 2011
207
27
Tillamook, OR
Detector(s) used
White's 4900/D Pro Plus
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
Swartzie,

you didn't show what the shore line looks like, in most cases you work the shore or you use a hand suction device to work around rocks on the inside of a curve in the river. By the looks of those pics you're going to have to wait till that water goes down to about half that flow. JMO

Gramps
 

OP
OP
Swartzie

Swartzie

Hero Member
Mar 15, 2009
791
52
Tuscarawas County, Ohio
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Tejon
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Gramps43 said:
Swartzie,

you didn't show what the shore line looks like, in most cases you work the shore or you use a hand suction device to work around rocks on the inside of a curve in the river. By the looks of those pics you're going to have to wait till that water goes down to about half that flow. JMO

Gramps

Yeah, we just got an inch of rain the day I took the pictures. So the water was up a bit.
The banks are pretty much mud. But, there is one area near the shore where there is a build up of material. This area did seem to give me more black sand than places I worked in the rocks. Maybe I'll concentrate on that.

-Swatzie
 

63bkpkr

Silver Member
Aug 9, 2007
4,069
4,618
Southern California
Detector(s) used
XLT, GMT, 6000D Coinmaster
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Swartzie,
Go to Google
Google "how to understand a river for prospecting, or maybe "how to prospect a river", or "how to read a river for prospecting", or "how to read a river for panning" or something like these suggestions. What you are looking for is a How To on reading and panning a river done my a fellow in Oregon. It is a very nice piece of work that he published for all to enjoy.

Good Luck, 63bkpkr
 

ivan salis

Gold Member
Feb 5, 2007
16,794
3,810
callahan,fl
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
delta 4000 / ace 250 - used BH and many others too
large sized rocks often have "dead - non current spots" behind them --known as "slack spots" fish in streams often lay there waiting for food passing by in the current , then dart out and grab it --gold often settles in these dead spots as well -- wait till you get a slower current -low water conditions and scope em out --inside cuts with blocked areas can be highly productive as well. :wink: :icon_thumright:
 

Hoser John

Gold Member
Mar 22, 2003
5,854
6,721
Redding,Calif.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Panning is the slowest least productive of all mining methods and in fact is for sampling normally only or cleanups on bigger equipment. Go for solid bedrock whenever possible as them cracks and crevices are natures sluicebox and 90% of the hard work is already done for ya. Scrape,dig,gouge and blast whatever to mt them---John
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top